Representation and practices of Electronic Nicotine Delivery System consumption in the university population of Bogotá(Colombia)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14482/indes.32.02.864.425Keywords:
Social Representation, Consumption practices, ENDS, Youth and healthAbstract
Objective: Colombia has had a tobacco control legislation since 2009, however there is no specific regulation on Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS). Therefore, it is crucial to characterize the qualitative dimensions of consumption. The study aimed to answer the question: What are the representations and practices of the university population regarding the consumption of SEAN? The objective of the study is to identify the practices and representations of ENDS consumers in order to obtain elements to guide the necessary actions to prevent their consumption.
Methods: This paper presents the results identified in the qualitative component of a main study on the prevalence of ENDS use among university students. 14 individual interviews and 1 focus group were conducted and analyzed with the NVivo10® software. The corpus consisted of the transcripts of the 14 interviews and 1 focus group, which constitutes a total of 116 pages of raw data. The techniques used were semi-structured interviews and focus groups, using the Microsoft Teams platform. Taking into account ethical aspects, in each interview and in the focus group the informed consent was read and authorization was requested for the interview to be recorded. The average duration of each interview was one hour and forty-five minutes and the focus group lasted a total of 120 minutes. The capture of practices and representation related to the use/non-use of SEAN was achieved by incorporating two phases of analysis: a)Inductive phase: it was developed with an ordered matrix on the theoretical categories of the project, b)Phase of deductive analysis was carried out based on processes typical of the founded theory that allowed expanding the analytical framework having as its axis the identification of consumption practices and the elements that make up the central core and the peripheral system of representation.
Results: The main results are the identification of consumption practices, from which it was derived that the central nucleus of the social representation of SEAN is non-autonomous, which enables a change that discourages its consumption. The reasons and practices for consuming ENDS are closely related to conventional cigarette consumption, which corresponds to the fact that 11 of the 14 interviewees who identify themselves as consumers have consumed conventional cigarettes and only two have been exclusive ENDS consumers. The following practices were identified: a) The consumption motivations were grouped like social, economic and socio-emotional; b) Three types of consumption spaces: prohibited, exclusive and recovered spaces. These last ones are places where you couldn't smoke cigarettes and now they feel empowered to vape; c) There are forms of differential consumption and access to ENDS related to the quality, price, exclusivity and adherence; d) Habits and rituals are not related to moments of daily life, as with cigarettes, but to practices such as searching for and mixing "salts" to obtain flavors, cleaning and maintaining the device, smoking tricks; e) About information channels among the interviewees it was noted that the practice of informed consumption is not frequent and that there are few sources of information that offer low confidence. Finally, the peripheral system of representation is made up of three elements: social dimension, the consumption of SEAN as a lifestyle, bodied and emotional dimension.
Conclusion: It is concluded that the actions to prevent the consumption of ENDS should start from the identification of particular and exclusive characteristics of the consumption of ENDS and the incorporation of the elements of the peripheral system that allow addressing a consumption not based on making informed decisions. The main finding is the identification of a non-autonomous representation that stems from the difficulty of establishing notable differentiations between conventional cigarette consumption and e-cigarettes. Therefore, the main vein of research that opens up is to delve into the particular and exclusive characteristics of this consumption.
It is essential to incorporate bodily, emotional, and especially social (interpersonal) dimensions as important variables in understanding the practices and representations of e-cigarettes through complex approaches that can break the solid elements on which conventional cigarette consumption is anchored, as it continues to define dynamics of electronic device consumption.
It is important at this point to recognize that emotions can be understood as the intermediary between the lived experience in the body and everything that happens in the environment. Thus, it is not possible to think of this representation without recognizing that consumption is an embodied exercise, and the absence of the body in discourses about e-cigarettes can be a revealing element of a disconnection between practices and meanings that are reinforced in the insistence on an action (smoking is smoking) despite the recognition of its negative effects on health (even though it should not be).
The understanding of the social representation of e-cigarette consumption in relation to specific practices related to it provides some clues on which to work on processes of information, communication, prevention, and regulation to discourage this consumption that appears relatively new.
References
Abric, J-C. (2001). Prácticas sociales y representaciones. Ediciones Coyoacán.
Amâncio, L. y Oliveira, J. (2006). Men as individuals, women as a sexed category: implications of symbolic asymmetry for feminist practice and feminist psychology. Fem Psychol, 16,35-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0959-353506060818
Alexander, J., Williams, P. y Lee, Y. (2018). Youth who use e-cigarettes regularly: A qualitative study of behavior, attitudes, and familial norms. Prev Med Rep, 13, 93-97. Published online 2018 Nov 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.11.011
Batel, S., Castro, P. y Devine-Wright, P. (2016). Developing a critical agenda to understand pro-environmental actions: contributions from Social Representations and Social Practices Theories. WIREs Clim Change, 727-745. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.417
Bernat, D., Gasquet, N., Wilson, K. O., Porter, L. y Choi, K. (2018). Electronic Cigarette Harm and Benefit Perceptions and Use Among Youth. American journal of preventive medicine, 55(3), 361-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.043
Case, K. R., Hinds, J. T., Creamer, M. R., Loukas, A. y Perry, C. L. (2019). Who is JUULing and Why? An Examination of Young Adult Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Users. The Journal of adolescent health: official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 66(1), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.05.030
Choi, K., Fabian, L., Mottey, N., Corbett, A. y & Forster, J. (2012). Young adults' favorable perceptions of snus, dissolvable tobacco products, and electronic cigarettes: findings from a focus group study. American journal of public health, 102(11), 2088-2093. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300525
Devine-Wright, H. y Devine-Wright, P. (2010). Social representations of electricity network technologies: exploring processes of anchoring and objectification through the use of visual research methods. The British journal of social psychology, 48(Pt 2), 357-373. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X349504
Etter, J. F. y Bullen, C. (2011). Electronic cigarette: users profile, utilization, satisfaction and perceived efficacy. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 106(11), 2017-2028. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03505.x
Fry, G., Grogan, S., Gough, B. y Conner, M. (2010). Smoking in the lived world: how young people make sense of the social role cigarettes play in their lives. The British journal of social psychology, 47(Pt 4), 763-780. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608X288818
Hall, S. (1997) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage Publications, London.
Harrell, P. T., Brandon, T. H., England, K. J., Barnett, T. E., Brockenberry, L. O., Simmons, V. N. y Quinn, G. P. (2019). Vaping Expectancies: A Qualitative Study among Young Adult Nonusers, Smokers, Vapers, and Dual Users. Substance abuse: research and treatment, 13, 1178221819866210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1178221819866210
Hakoköngäs, E. y Sakkia, I. (2016) The Naturalized Nation: Anchoring, Objectification and Naturalized Social Representations of History. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), 646-669. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.664
Heary, C. y Hennessy, E. (2012) Focus Groups Versus Individual Interviews with Children: A Comparison of Data. Irish Journal of Psychology, 27(1),58-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03033910.2006.10446228
Howarth, C. (2006). A social representation is not a quiet thing: exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. The British journal of social psychology, 45(Pt 1), 65-86. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466605X43777
Howarth, C. y Andreouli E. (2015). ‘Changing the context’: tackling discrimination at school and in society. Int J Educ Dev, 41,184-191. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.06.004
Hung, M et al. (2022). The association of adolescent e-cigarette harm perception to advertising exposure and marketing type. Archives of Public Health, 80,114.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-00867-6
Kong, G., Morean, M. E., Cavallo, D. A., Camenga, D. R. y Krishnan-Sarin, S. (2014). Reasons for Electronic Cigarette Experimentation and Discontinuation Among Adolescents and Young Adults. Nicotine & tobacco research: official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 17(7), 847-854. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu257
Laudry, R et al. (2019). The role of flavors in vaping iniciation and satisfaction among U.S. adults. Addictive Behaviors, 99,106077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106077
Mardellat, R. (2001). Prácticas comerciales y representaciones en el artesanado. En J-C. Abric (Ed.), Prácticas sociales y representaciones (pp. 129-158). Ediciones Coyoacán.
Martinasek, M. P., Bowersock, A. y Wheldon, C. W. (2018). Patterns, Perception and Behavior of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Use and Multiple Product Use Among Young Adults. Respiratory care, 63(7), 913-919. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.06001
Ministerio de Justicia y del Derecho – Observatorio de Drogas de Colombia (2019), Estudio Nacional de Consumo de Sustancias Psicoactivas Colombia 2019. Bogotá, D.C.: ODC. https://www.odc.gov.co/Portals/1/publicaciones/pdf/estudio%20Nacional%20de%20consumo%202019.pdf
Ministerio de Salud y Protección social (2019). Abecé cigarrillos electrónicos. ttps://www.minsalud.gov.co/sites/rid/Lists/BibliotecaDigital/RIDE/VS/PP/ENT/abece-general-cigarrilos-electronicos.pdf
Richardson, A., Pearson, J., Xiao, H., Stalgaitis, C. y Vallone, D. (2014). Prevalence, harm perceptions, and reasons for using noncombustible tobacco products among current and former smokers. American journal of public health, 104(8), 1437-1444. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301804
Robertson, L., Hoek, J., Blank, M. L., Richards, R., Ling, P. y Popova, L. (2018). Dual use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and smoked tobacco: a qualitative analysis. Tobacco control, 28(1), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054070
Roditis, M., Dineva,A., Smith,A., Walker,M., Delahanty, M., D’lorio,E. y D Holtz, K. (2020). Reactions to electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) prevention messages: results from qualitative research used to inform FDA’s first youth ENDS prevention campaign. Tobacc Control, 29, 510-515. https://doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055104
Romero-Torres, S. y Henríquez-Mendoza, G. (2019). Diferencias evitables en el cumplimiento de las medidas para el control del tabaco: Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador y Perú, 2017. Revista Colombiana de Cancerología, 23(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.35509/01239015.78.
Røpke, I. (2009) Theories of practice - new inspiration for ecological economic studies on consumption. Ecol Econ, 68,2490-2497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.015
Ruiz, F. J., García-Martín, M. B., Suárez-Falcón, J. C. y Odriozola-González, P. (2017). The hierarchical factor structure of the Spanish version of Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale - 21. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 17, 97-105.
Sherratt, F. C., Newson, L., Marcus, M. W., Field, J. K. y Robinson, J. (2016). Perceptions towards electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation among Stop Smoking Service users. British journal of health psychology, 21(2), 421-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12177
Téllez, LM., Romero-Torres, S. y Calderón, MI. (2020). Implementación del Convenio Marco de la Organización Mundial de la Salud para el control del tabaco y la prevención del cáncer en Colombia. Rev Cienc Salud,18(1),169-187.
Uang, R., Crosbie, E. y Glantz, S. A. (2017). Smokefree implementation in Colombia: Monitoring, outside funding, and business support. Salud pública de México, 59(2), 128-136. https://doi.org/10.21149/7884
Wagner, W. (2015). Representation in action. En G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. y J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Social Representations (pp. 12-28). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323650.004
Walker, D. y Myrick, F. (2006). Grounded theory: an exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative health research, 16(4), 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285972
Wagoner, K. G., Cornacchione, J., Wiseman, K. D., Teal, R., Moracco, K. E. y Sutfin, E. L. (2016). E-cigarettes, Hookah Pens and Vapes: Adolescent and Young Adult Perceptions of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems. Nicotine & tobacco research: official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 18(10), 2006-2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw095
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sandra Liliana Osses Rivera
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Research & Development provides free access to its content to those who register on the website under the principle that making research freely available to the public supports greater global knowledge sharing.
It runs under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
Neither the submission nor the processing of the articles implies costs for the authors or the institutions of which they are part.