Thought and Struggle in the Monetary Phase of Capitalism According to Deleuze and Guattari [Spanish]

Authors

  • Julian Ferreyra CONICET/UBA

Keywords:

Capitalism, Idea, intensity, Deleuze and Guattari, monetary relation, monetary struggle.

Abstract

Deleuze and Guattari (1972, 1980) characterize Capitalism as a series of differen­tial relations between flows: labor / capital; means of payment / financing currency; scientific and technological codes / market. At the same time, they think the ways of struggle through the Italian operaismo. This paper shows the articulation of the two dimensions of politics by holding that they are an application of the two fundamental ontological concepts of Difference and Repetition (1968): differential Idea and intensity as factors of individuation. To do that, we will focus on the monetary relation, using the theory of the economists who are source for Deleuze and Guattari (De Brunhoff and Schmitt) and the struggle at a monetary level proposed by Berti.


Author Biography

Julian Ferreyra, CONICET/UBA

Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argen­tina)

djulianferreyra@gmail.com

Doctor en filosofía (UBA/París X), investigador independiente del CONICET (Argentina) y jefe de trabajos prácticos de Antropología Filosófica (Departamento de Filo­sofía, FFyL, UBA). Investiga el rol del Estado en la filosofía de Gilles Deleuze y la relación de este filóso­fo francés con el idealismo alemán (particularmente Hegel y Fichte). Es director general de Ideas, revista de filosofía moderna y contemporánea y de la colección Deleuze y las fuen­tes de su filosofía. Dirige el grupo de investigación “Deleuze: ontología práctica (a.k.a La deleuziana)”. En­tre sus publicaciones se destacan: L’ontologie du capitalisme chez Gilles Deleuze (Paris, L’Harmattan, 2010), “Deleuze y el Estado”, (Deus Morta­lis) y “Deleuze’s Bêtise: Dissolution and Genesis in the Properly Human Form of Bestiality” (Continental and Comparative Philosophy).

References

<p>Alliez, E. &amp; Lazzarato, M. (2016). Guerres et Capital. Paris: Amsterdam.</p><p><br />Balibar. E. (1996). Sur les concepts fondamentaux du matérialisme historique. En L. Alhtusser (Ed.), Lire le Capital (pp. 419-568). Paris: PUF.</p><p>Bedaire, Q. (Junio, 2016). Gilles Deleuze face aux hétérodoxies monétaires régulationnistes, post-keynésiennes et marxistes: jalons pour un dialogue transdisciplinaire sur la monnaie et la dette. Trabajo presentado en el Colloque International Institutionnalismes Monétaires Francophones en la Universidad de Lyon, Lyon: Francia.</p><p><br />Berti, L. (2016). Marx, Money and Capital. Turín: Rizosfera.</p><p><br />Berti, L. (1975-1976). Risposta a Suzanne De Brunhoff. Primo Maggio, (6), 51-57. Recuperado de: <br /> https://www.autistici.org/operaismo/PrimoMaggio/La%20rivista/Primo%20Maggio%20%236.pdf</p><p><br />Berti, L. (1974). Denaro come capitale. Primo Maggio, (3-4), 11-17. Recuperado de: https://www.autistici.org/operaismo/PrimoMaggio/La%20rivista/Primo%20Maggio%20%233-4.pdf</p><p><br />Bidet, J. (1999). Travail. En G. Labica y G. Benussan. Dictionnaire critique du marxisme. Paris: PUF.</p><p><br />Child, Ch. (1915). Individuality in Organisms. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.</p><p><br />De Brunhoff, S. (1975-1976). Punto di vista marxista sulla crisi monetaria. Primo Maggio, (6), 47-51. Recuperado de:<br /> https://www.autistici.org/operaismo/PrimoMaggio/La%20rivista/Primo%20Maggio%20%236.pdf</p><p><br />De Brunhoff, S. (1975). La oferta de moneda. Trad. H. Ciafardini. Buenos Aires: Tiempo Contemporáneo.</p><p><br />De Brunhoff, S. (1973). La concepción monetaria de Marx. Trad. H. Acevedo. Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Siglo.</p><p><br />Deleuze, G. (2015). La subjetivación. Curso sobre Foucault. Tomo III. Buenos Aires: Cactus.</p><p><br />Deleuze, G. (2014). El poder. Curso sobre Foucault. Tomo II. Buenos Aires: Cactus.</p><p><br />Deleuze, G. (2005). Derrames, entre el capitalismo y la esquizofrenia. Cactus: Buenos Aires.</p><p><br />Deleuze, G. (1986). Foucault. Paris: Minuit.</p><p><br />Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et répétition. Paris: PUF.</p><p><br />Deleuze, G. (1962). Nietzsche et la philsophie. Paris: PUF.</p><p><br />Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. (1980). Mille plateaux. Paris: Minuit.</p><p><br />Deleuze, G. y Guattari. F. (1972). L'Anti-Oedipe. Paris: Minuit.</p><p><br />Dillet, B. (2016). Geopower: A Strato-Analysis of the Anthropocene. La Deleuziana, Rivista Online di Filosofia, (4), 1-10. Recuperado de:<br />http://www.ladeleuziana.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Dillet-%E2%80%93-Geopower-A-Strato-Analysis-of-the-Anthropocene-1.pdf</p><p><br />Dosse, F. (2007). Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari, Biographie croisée. Paris: La Découverte.</p><p><br />Ferreyra, J. (2018). Esferas y pliegues: la aplicabilidad de la biopolítica de Fichte a Deleuze. Estudios de Filosofía, (57), en prensa.</p><p><br />Ferreyra, J. (2016). Una apología del Estado como aparato de captura en Deleuze y Guattari. Nombres, (30), 239-262. Recuperado de: https://revistas.unc.edu.ar/index.php/NOMBRES/article/view/21243/20771</p><p><br />Ferreyra, J. (2013-2014). Deleuze y el Estado pluralista. Deus Mortalis, (11), 211-234. Recuperado de: http://deleuziana.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Deleuze-y-el-estado-pluralista-1.pdf</p><p><br />Ferreyra, J. (2011-2012). Deleuze y el Estado. Deus Mortalis, (10), 265-286. Recuperado de: http://deleuziana.com.ar/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Deleuze-y-el-Estado.pdf</p><p><br />Ferreyra, J. (2010). L'ontologie du capitalisme chez Gilles Deleuze. Paris: L'Harmattan.</p><p><br />Hobsbawm, E. J. (1952). The Machine Breakers. Past &amp; Present, (1), pp. 57-70. Doi: 10.1093/past/1.1.57</p><p><br />Jones, S. (2006). Against technology: from the Luddites to Neo-Luddism. New York: Routledge.</p><p><br />Kerslake, Ch. (2015). Marxism and Money in Deleuze and Guattari's Capitalism and Schizophrenia: On the Conflict Between the Theories of Suzanne de Brunhoff and Bernard Schmitt. Parrhesia, (22), 38-78. Recuperado de: https://www.parrhesiajournal.org/parrhesia22/parrhesia22_kerslake.pdf</p><p><br />Keynes, J. M. (1924). A Tract on Monetary Reform. Londres: MacMillan.</p><p><br />Koenig, G. (2013). La philosophie de Gilles Deleuze, un système kantien, une politique anarco-capitaliste. Paris: Ellipses.</p><p><br />Marx, K. (2010). Das Kapital, Dritter Band. Berlín: Dietz.</p><p><br />Marx, K. (1972). Elementos fundamentales para la crítica de la economía política (Grundrisse) 1857-1858). Trad. P. Scaron. México: Siglo XXI.</p><p><br />Prestipino, G. (2000). Narciso e l'automobile. Moderno e transmoderno. Napoli: La Città del Sole.</p><p><br />Rambeau, F. (2016). Les secondes vies du sujet. Paris: Hermann.</p><p><br />Read, J., (2008). The Age of Cynicism: Deleuze and Guattari on the Production of Subjectivity in Capitalism. En Buchanan, I. y Thoburn N. (eds.), Deleuze and Politics (pp. 139-159). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.</p><p><br />Roffe, J. (2017). Deleuze's Concept of Quasi-cause. Deleuze Studies, 11(2), 278-294.</p><p><br />Santaya, G. (2015). La Idea según Gilles Deleuze: una aproximación desde el cálculo diferencial. Ideas, revista de filosofía moderna y contemporánea, (1), 134-162. Recuperado de: https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/full/10.3366/dls.2017.0266</p><p><br />Schmitt, B. (1966). Monnaie, salaires et profits. Paris: PUF.</p><p><br />Thoburn, N. (2003). Deleuze, Marx and Politics. Londres-Nueva York: Routledge.</p><p><br />Tronti, M. (2006). Operai e capitale. Roma: DeriveApprodi.</p><p><br />Will, E. (1955). Les origines du monnayage. Revue Numismatique, 5(17), 5-23.</p><p><br />Wirth, J. (2015). Schelling's Practice of the Wild. Albany: SUNY Press.</p><p> </p>
Cover

Downloads

Published

2018-12-03

Issue

No. 30 (2019): January-june

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.