Inter-Epochal Dialogues in the Platonic Alcibiades I. Phenomenological Aspects on Intersubjectivity and Empathy in the Analogy of the Sight [Spanish]

Authors

  • Claudia Teresa Mársico Universidad de Buenos Aires

Keywords:

Plato, Alcibiades, anthropology, Phenomenology, historicity

Abstract

This work highlights the significance of the study on intersubjectivity and empathy in the platonic Alcibiades I to show its relevance for the understanding of the development of ancient anthropology and its value as a case study on the dialogue between philosophical ideas from different historical moments. For this purpose, we will examine the definition of the human being and the analogy of the sight, and we will connect this approaches with contemporary phenomenological views about intersubjectivity and empathy in order to explore this issue and to reveal the power of inter-epochal dialogue as a primary element of the internal logic of philosophy.


Author Biography

Claudia Teresa Mársico, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Profesora a cargo de la Cátedra de Historia de la Filosofía Antigua de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Doctora en Filosofía, Directora de la Sección de Estudios de Filosofía Antigua de la Academia Nacional de Ciencias de Buenos Aires.

References

<div>Adkins, A. (1970). From the Many to the One: A Study of Personality and Views of Human Nature in the Context of Ancient Greek Society, Values, and Beliefs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Alves, P. S. (2012). Empatía y ser-para-otro. Husserl y Sartre ante el problema de la intersubjetividad. Investigaciones fenomenológicas, 9, 11-38. Recuperado de: https://www2.uned.es/dpto_fim/InvFen/InvFen09/pdf/01_ALVES.pdf</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Andrews, M. (2004). Edmund Husserl: Empathy and the Transcendental Constitution of the World. Analecta Husserliana, 79, 217-237.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Barnouw, J. (2004). Odysseus, hero of practical intelligence: deliberation and signs in Homer’s Odyssey. Maryland: University Press of America.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Benitez, E. (2012). Authenticity, Experiment of Development. In M. Johnson &amp; H. Tarrant, Alcibiades and the Socratic Lover-Educator (pp.119-133). London: Bristol Classical Press.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Bieda, E. y Mársico, C. (2014). Diálogos interepocales. La antigüedad griega en el pensamiento contemporáneo. Buenos Aires: Rhesis.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Boys-Stones, G. (2004). Phaedo of Elis and Plato on the Soul. Phronesis, 49 (1), 1-23. Doi: 10.1163/156852804773617389.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Brancacci, A. (1990). Oikeios logos. La filosofia del linguaggio di Antistene. Napoli: Bibliopolis.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>De Landázuri, M. (2015). The Development of Self-Knowledge in Plato’s Philosophy. Logos: Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, 48, 123-140. Doi: 10.5209/rev_ASEM.2015.v48.49277</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Di Benedetto, V. (1966). Trace de Antistene in alcuni scoli all’Odissea. Studi Italiani di Filologia Classica, 28, 208-228.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Dorion, L. (2007). Plato and enkráteia. En C. Bobonich y P. Destrée (Eds.). Akrasia in Greek Philosophy (pp.119-138). Leiden: Brill.</div><div><br /></div><div><div>Eggers Lan, C. (1990). El concepto de alma en Homero. Buenos Aires: OPFyL.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Ehlers, B. (1966). Eine vorplatonische Deutung des sokratischen Eros: der Dialog Aspasia des Sokratikers Aischines. München: Beck.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Fine, G. (1993). On Ideas. Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Theory of Forms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>FS = Mársico, C. (2013a y 2014).</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Gallese, V. et al. (1998). Mirror Neurons and the Simulation Theory of Mind-Reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 493–501. Doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01262-5</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Gallese, V. et al. (2001). The “Shared Manifold” Hypothesis: from mirror neurons to empathy. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8 (5–7), 33–50. Recuperado de: http://hemi.nyu.edu/courses/sp2016-performanceand-activism/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2016/02/02242016-Gallese.pdf</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Gallesse, V. et al. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8 (9), 396–403. Doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.002</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Gallese, V. et al. (2011). How the body in action shapes the self. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18, 117–143. Recuperado de: https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/imp/jcs/2011/00000018/</div><div>f0020007/art00006</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>García, E. (2018). ¿En qué sentido mi cuerpo es mío? El “cuerpo propio”. In Ideen II y Phénoménologie de la perception. Investigaciones fenomenológicas, 15, 21-43. Recuperado de: https://www2.uned.es/dpto_fim/InvFen/InvFen15/pdf/2_Garcia.pdf</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Gill, C. (1996). Personality in Greek Epic, Tragedy and Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Goldin, O. (1993). Self, Sameness, and Soul in Alcibiades I and the Timaeus. Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie, 40 (1-2). Recuperado de: https://epublications.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1769&amp;context=phil_fac</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Hua = Husserl, E. (1950-). Gesammelte Werke-Husserliana, I-LX. Dordrecht: Springer.</div></div><div><br /></div><div><div>Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, Empathy, and Mirror Neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653-670. Doi: 10.1146/annurev. psych.60.110707.163604</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Illarraga, R. (2012). Utopía ciclópea, utopía de cerdos. Una reconstrucción del pensamiento de Antístenes a la luz de la sociedad de los cíclopes (FS, 104) y la ciudad de los cerdos de República, II. En L. Miseri (comp.), Estado, cultura y desarrollo: entre la utopía y la crítica (pp. 247-274). Mar del Plata: UNMdP.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Inverso, H. (2015). El mundo entre paréntesis. Una arqueología de las nociones de reducción y corporalidad. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Inverso, H. (2017). La fenomenología de lo inaparente y el problema de las vías hacia el plano trascendental. Eidos, 26, 43-73. Doi: 10.14482/eidos.26.8670.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Inverso, H. (2018). Fenomenología de lo inaparente. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Irwin, T. (1991). Aristippus Against Happiness. The Monist, 74 (1), 55-82. Doi: 10.5840MONIST19917412</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Jardine, J. (2014). Husserl and Stein on the Phenomenology of Empathy: Perception and Explication. Synthesis Philosophica, 29 (2), 273-288. Recuperado de: https://hrcak.srce.hr/142422</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Jirsa, J. (2009). Authenticity of the Alcibiades I. Some Reflections. Listy filologicke/Folia philologica, 132 (3-4), 225-244. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23468631</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>King, R. (Ed.) (2006). Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity. Berlin: de Gruyter.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Lohmar, D. (2006). Mirror Neurons and the Phenomenology of Intersubjectivity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 5, 5-16. Doi: 10.1007/s11097-005-9011-x</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Mársico, C. (2010). Zonas de tensión dialógica. Perspectivas para la filosofía antigua. Buenos Aires: del Zorzal.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Mársico, C. (2013a). Filósofos socráticos, Testimonios y fragmentos. I. Megáricos y cirenaicos. Buenos Aires: Losada.</div><div><br /></div></div><div><br /></div><div><div>Mársico, C. (2013b). Sobre los cerdos. Aspectos de la phúsis en Antístenes. En E. Bieda - C. Mársico (Eds.), Expresar la phúsis. Conceptualizaciones antiguas sobre la naturaleza. Buenos Aires: UNSAMEdita.</div><div><br /></div><div>Mársico, C. (2014). Filósofos socráticos, Testimonios y fragmentos II. Buenos Aires: Losada.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Mársico, C. (2017). Shock, Erotics, Plagiarism and Fraud: Aspects of Aeschines of Sphettus’ Philosophy. In A. Stavru &amp; C. Moore (Eds.), Socrates and the Socratic Dialogue. Leiden: Brill.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Mársico, C. (2019). About the Common Grounds of the Socratic Philosophies: The Anthropological Core. Acta Classica, 63, 20-40. Doi: 10.12731/AClass.063.07</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Montiglio, S. (2011). From Villain to Hero: Odysseus in Ancient Thought. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>O’Keefe, K. (2015). The Sources and Scope of Cyrenaic Scepticism. In U. Zilioli (Ed.), From the Socratics to the Socratic Schools. London: Routledge.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Pentassuglio, F. (2014). Socrates on Virtue and Self-Knowledge in Alcibiades I and Aeschines’ Alcibiades. Archai: Revista de Estudos Sobre as Origens Do Pensamento Ocidental, 12, 65-76. Recuperado de: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/archai/article/view/8406</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Pentassuglio, F. (2017). Eschine di Sfetto. Testimonianze. Turhout: Brepols.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Snell, B. (1953). The Discovery of the Mind. Oxford: OUP.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>SSR = Socratis et Socraticorum Fragmenta. En G. Giannantoni (Ed.). Napoli: Bibliopolis.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Steinbock, A. (1995). Home and Beyond: Generative Phenomenology After Husserl. Illinois: Northwestern University Press.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Steinbock, A. (1998). Husserl’s Static and Genetic Phenomenology: Translator’s Introduction to two Essays. Continental Philosophy Review, 31, 127-153. Doi: 10.1023/A:1010089123758</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Thompson, E. (2001). Empathy and Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8 (5–7), 1–32. Recuperado de: https://evanthompsondotme. files.wordpress.com/2012/11/jcs-empathy.pdf</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Tsouna, V. (1998). The Epistemology of the Cyrenaic School. Santa Barbara: University of California Press.</div></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div><div>Wald, B. (2003). Participación y personalidad. Anuario Filosófico, XXXVI/1. Recuperado de: https://dadun.unav.edu/handle/10171/95</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Walton, R. (2002). Fenomenología de la empatía. Philosophica, 24-5.</div><div><br /></div><div>Woods, J. (2004). Plato’s Villains: The Ethical Implications of Plato’s Portrayal of Alcibiades and Critias. Dissertation: Duquesne University.</div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div><div>Zahavi, D. (2011). Empathy and Direct Social Perception: A Phenomenological Proposal. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2 (3), 541. Doi: 10.1007/s13164-011-0070-3</div></div>

Downloads

Published

2020-12-12

Issue

No. 35 (2021): January-june

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.