Hegel’s Concept of Actuality and the Critique of Metaphysics [Spanish]
Keywords:
Hegel, Metaphysics, Logic, Ontology, Absolute, Critique of MetaphysicsAbstract
This paper aims to reconstruct the arguments of the first chapter within the third section of the Doctrine of Essence, namely “The Absolute”. Its hypothesis is that the critic of metaphysics within this chapter not only champions a relational process-ontology, but also states an implicit distinction between first and second order theories of the Absolute. The first-order theory of the Absolute purports to present a definition of the
Absolute without analytic contradictions. The second-order theory of the Absolute not only sets out the nature of the Absolute, but also seeks to include the thought and
the theory of the Absolute within the Absolute itself.
References
Bartuschat, W. (2007). Nur hinein nicht heraus. Hegel über Spinoza. En D. Heidemann & C. Krijnen (Eds.), Hegel und die Geschichte der Philosophie (pp. 101-115). Darmstadt, Alemania: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesselschaft.
Fleischmann, E. (1964). Die Wirklichkeit in Hegels Logik, Ideengeschichtliche Beziehungen zu Spinoza. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 18, 3-29.
Gabriel, M. (2015). Metafisica o Ontologia. Epekeina, 5(1), 9-32. Doi:10.7408/epkn.v5i1.123
Hegel, G. (2014a). Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften. Fráncfort del Meno, Alemania: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, G. (2014b). Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Philosophie. Fráncfort del meno, Alemania: Suhrkamp.
Hegel, G. (2014c). Wissenschaft der Logik. Fráncfort del Meno, Alemania: Suhrkamp.
Hoffmann, Th. S. (2010). Totalität und Prädikation. Zur ersten „Stellung des Gedankens zur Objektivität im enzyklopädischen“ „Vorbegriff“ der spekulativen Logik. En A. Denker & A. Sell (Eds.), Der „Vorbegriff“ zur Wissenschaft der Logik und der Enzyklopädie von 1830 (pp. 114-143). Friburgo de Brisgovia: Verlag Karl Alber.
Houlgate, S. (1999). Hegel’s Critique of Foundationalism. En A. O’Hear (Ed.), German Philosophy Since Kant (pp. 25-46). Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press.
Houlgate, S. (2011). Essence, Reflexion and Inmediacy in Hegel’s Science of Logic . En S. Houlgate & M. Baur (Eds.), A Companion to Hegel (pp. 139-158). Chichester, Reino Unido: Blackwell Publishing. Doi: 10.1002/9781444397161
Iber, C. (2016). Hegels Begriff der Reflexion als Kritik am traditionellen Wesens- und Reflexionsbegriff. En A. Arndt & G. Kruch (Eds.), Hegels Lehre vom Wesen (pp. 21-34). Berlín: De Gruyter.
Longueneese, B. (2007). Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics. Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press. Doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511487262
Macherey, P. (2006). Hegel o Spinoza. M. d. Rodríguez (trad.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Tinta limón ediciones.
Mangel, T. H. (2013). Hegel und die Geistmetaphysik des Aristoteles. Berlín, Alemania: De Gruyter.
Marcuse, H. (1932). Hegels Ontologie und die Grundlegung einer Theorie der Geschichtlichkeit. Fráncfort del Meno: Vittorio Klostermann.
McDowell, J. (2009). Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel and Sellars. Cambridge/Londres: Cambridge University Press.
Melamed, Y. (2010). Acosmism or Weak Individuals? Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of The Finite. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48, 77-92. Doi:10.1353/hph.0.0180
Newlands, S. (2011). Hegel’s Idealist Reading of Spinoza. Philosophy Compass, 6, 100-108. Doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00378.x
Okochi, T. (2008). Ontologie und Reflexionsbestimmungen. Zur Genealogie der Wesenslogik Hegels. Würzburg, Alemania: Königshausen & Neumann.
Pippin, R. (1989). Hegel’s Idealism. The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambdrige University Press.
Quante, M. (2018). Die Lehre vom Wesen. Erster Abschnitt. Das Wesen als Reflexion in ihm selbst. En N. M. Michael Quante (Ed.), Kommentar zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik (pp. 275-324). Hamburgo, Alemania: Meiner Verlag.
Rohs, P. (1982). Form und Grund. Interpretation eines Kapitels der hegelschen Wissenschaft der Logik. Bonn, Alemania: Bouvier.
Rohs, P. (2004). Der Pantheismus bei Spinoza und im deutschen Idealismus. En B. Merker, G. Mohr & M. Quante (Eds.), Subjektivität und Annerkenung (pp. 102-121). Pandeborn, Alemania: Mentis.
Rosenkranz, K. (1870). Erläuterungen zur Hegels Encyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften. Berlín, Alemania: L. Heimann.
Sandkaulen, B. (2007). Die Ontologie der Substanz, der Begriff der Subjektivität und die Faktizität des Einzelnen. Hegels reflexionslogische “Widerlegung der Spinozanischen Metaphysik”. En J. Stolzenberg & K. Amerkis (Eds), Metaphysik im deutschen Idealismus (pp. 235-275). Berlín, Alemania: De Gruyter.
Sandkaulen, B. (2012). La pensée post-metaphysique de Hegel. Archives de Philosophie, 2, 253-265. Doi: 10.3917/aphi.752.0253
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
