How Close Are We to Understanding the Sense of Body Ownership?
Keywords:
body, ownership, bodily awareness, bodily experience, bodily sensationsAbstract
There has been much discussion about the sense of ownership recently. It is a very controversial topic and even minimal consensus seems hard to achieve. In this paper we attempt to assess the prospects of achieving a better understanding of what is meant
by ‘sense of body ownership’. In order to do so, we begin by addressing an objection on which the notion itself might depend, coming from the distinction between ‘inflationary’
and ‘deflationary’ accounts of the sense of body ownership. Once the path is clear, we will consider some influential ways of approaching the issue, which propose grounding the sense of ownership in the spatiality of bodily sensations, the affective
dimension of bodily experience, and in its spatial dimension, among other things. We expect the results of our discussion will allow us to both identify the strongest candidates for an account of the sense of body ownership and to determine the challenges that must be met by competing explanations.
References
Akins, K. (1996). Of Sensory Systems and the “Aboutness” of Mental States. Journal of Philosophy, 93(7), 337-372. doi: 10.2307/2941125
Alsmith, A. (2015). Mental Activity and the Sense of Ownership. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(4), 881-896. doi: 10.1007/s13164-014-0208-1
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Harvard University Press.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1962). On Sensations of Position. Analysis, 22(3), 55-58. doi: 10.1093/analys/22.3.55
Bermúdez, J. L. (1998). The Paradox of Self-Consciousness. MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/5227.001.0001
Bermúdez, J. L. (2011) Bodily Awareness and Self-Consciousness. In S. Gallagher (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Self (pp. 157-179). Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548019.003.0007
Bermúdez, J. L. (2014) Bodily Ownership, Bodily Awareness and Knowledge without Observation. Analysis, 75(1), 37-45. doi: 10.1093/analys/anu119
Bermúdez, J. L. (2017). Ownership and the Space of the Body. In F. de Vignemont & A. J. Alsmith (Eds.), The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body, pp. 117-144. MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/11306.003.0011
Berthier, M., Starkstein, S., & Leiguarda, R. (1988). Asymbolia for Pain: A Sensory-Limbic Disconnection Syndrome. Annals of Neurology, 24(1), 41-49. doi: 10.1002/ana.410240109
Billon, A. (2016). Making sense of the Cotard syndrome: Insights from the study of depersonalisation. Mind & Language, 31(3), 356-391. doi: 10.1111/mila.12110
Billon, A. (2017). Mineness First: Three Challenges to the Recent Theories of the Sense of Bodily Qwnership. In F. de Vignemont & A.
J. Alsmith (Eds.), The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body (pp. 189-216). MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/10462.003.0012
Botvinick, M. & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber Hands ‘Feel’ Touch that Eyes See. Nature, 391(6669), 756. doi: 10.1038/35784
De Vignemont, F. (2007). Habeas Corpus: The Sense of Ownership of One’s Own Body. Mind & Language, 22(4), 427-449. doi: 0017.2007.00315.x
De Vignemont, F. (2013). The Mark of Bodily Ownership. Analysis, 73(4), 643-651. doi:10.1093/analys/ant080
De Vignemont, F. (2017). Agency and Bodily Ownership: The Bodyguard Hypothesis. In F. de Vignemont & A. J. Alsmith (Eds.), The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body, pp. 217-236. MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/10462.003.0013
De Vignemont, F. (2018). Mind the Body: An Exploration of Bodily Self-Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198735885.001.0001
Evans, G. (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford University Press.
Gallagher, S. (2017a). Deflationary Accounts of the Sense of Ownership. In F. de Vignemont & A. J. Alsmith (Eds.), The Subject’s Matter: Self-Consciousness and the Body (pp. 145-162). MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/10462.003.0010
Gallagher, S. (2017b). Self-Defense: Deflecting Deflationary and Eliminativist Critiques of the Sense of Ownership. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1612. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01612
Martin, M. G. F. (1995). Bodily Awareness: A Sense of Ownership. In J. Bermúdez, N. Eilan, & A. Marcel (Eds.), The Body and the Self (pp. 267-289). MIT Press.
Moro, V., Zampini, M., and Aglioti, S. (2004). Changes in Spatial Position of Hands Modify Tactile Extinction but not Disownership of Contralesional Hand in Two Right Brain-Damaged Patients. Neurocase, 10, 437-443. doi: 10.1080/13554790490894020
Patocka, J. (1998). Body, Community, Language, World. Open Court.
Peacocke, C. (2015). Perception and the First Person. In M. Matthen (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Perception (pp. 169-180). Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199600472.013.022
Tsakiris, M. & Haggard, P. (2005). The Rubber Hand Illusion Revisited:Visuotactile Integration and Self-Attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 80. doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.80
Tsakiris, M., Prabhu, G., and Haggard, P. (2006). Having a Body Versus Moving your Body: How Agency Structures Body-Ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 423-32. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.004
Vallar, G. & Ronchi, R. (2009). Somatoparaphrenia: A Body Delusion. A Review of the Neuropsychological Literature. Experimental Brain Research, 192(3), 533-551. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1562-y
Zahavi, D. (2020). Consciousness and Selfhood: Getting Clearer on forme-ness and Mineness. In U. Kriegel (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness (pp. 635-653). Oxford University Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
