Pluralism and Logical Monism, Relativism and Linguistic Determinism: How do Logic and Language Influence our thinking?
Keywords:
logic, pluralism, monism, relativism, determinism, linguisticsAbstract
This paper aims to relate two debates about how logic and language influence thought. There is an axis of discussion about whether there exists a plurality of logic or a single logical system as an evaluation criterion for any reasoning context. In
linguistics, the debate arising from the strong and weak interpretations of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis has centralized the discussion around the degree of influence or determination of language on thought. From different perspectives and theoreticalconceptual frameworks, logic, and linguistics delimit and problematize a field of inquiry and reflection. The article, from a transdisciplinary perspective, intends to account for and postulate communicating vessels between these debates, considering the nuances of each approach. It also seeks to propose its own hypothesis on the problem raised.
References
Arazim, P. (2020). Beyond Logical Pluralism and Logical Monism. Logica Universalis, 14(2), 151–174. doi: 10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2
Aloni, M., Berto, F., Incurvati, L. (2018). Introduction: Semantics and Philosophy. Topoi, 37(3), 355–356. doi: 10.1007/s11245-017-9505-5
Beall, J. C. y Restall, G. (2005). Logical Pluralism. Oxfod: Oxford University Press.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English’s Speakers Notion of Time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0748.
Boroditsky, L. (2006). Linguistic Relativity. En Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. L. Nadel (Ed.) New York: John Wiley & Sons. (pp. 917-921). doi: 10.1002/0470018860.s00567
Boroditsky, L. y Prinz, J. (2012). What Thoughts Are Made Of. In G. R. Semin y E. R. Smith (Eds.) Embodied Grounding, Social, Cognitive, Affective, and Neuroscientific Approaches (pp 98-115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brandom, R. (2000). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Caret. C. (2021). Why Logical Pluralism? Synthese 198 (20), 4947-4968. doi: 10.1007/s11229-019-02132-w.
Carnap, R. (1959). Introduction to Semantics and Formalization of Logic. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press. Cook, R. (2010). Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom: A Tour of Logical Pluralism. Philosophy Compass, 5 (6), 492-504. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00286.x
Dolzani, M. (2016). La partícula ra'e en guaraní mbyá. Evidencialidad y temporalidad. LIAMES, 16(2) 241-260. doi: 20396/liames.v16i2.8646226
Dryer, M. (2013). Negative Morphemes. En M. S. Dryer y M. Haspelmath (Eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Recuperado de: http://wals.info/chapter/112.
Dryer, M. y Haspelmath, M. (Eds.) (2013). The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Recuperado de http://wals.info
Dutilh-Novaes, C. (2021). The Dialogical Roots of Deduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eklund, M. (2020). Making Sense of Logical Pluralism. Inquiry, 63(3-4), 433-454, doi: 10.1080/0020174X.2017.1321499
Evershed, J. W. (2021). Another Way Logic Might be Normative. Synthese, 199(3-4), 5861–5881. doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03049-z
Everett, D. L. (2008). Don't Sleep, There Are Snakes: Life and Language in the Amazonian Jungle. New York: Vintage Books.
Fausey, C.; Long, B.; Inamon, A y Boroditsky, L. (2010). Constructing Agency: The Role of Language. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 1-11.
Frege. G. [(1893), 2013] The Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Givón, T. (1991). Isomorphism in the Grammatical Code: Cognitive and Biological Considerations. Studies in Language, 15(1), 85-114. doi: 10.1075/sl.15.1.04giv.
Gomila, A. (2020). Cómo el lenguaje reconfigura el pensamiento: una revisión del programa neo-Whorfiano. Análisis. Revista de Investigación Filosófica, 7(2), 217-237.
Harman, G. (1986). Change in View: Principles of Reasoning. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Kouri Kissel, T. (2021). Metalinguistic Negotiation and Logical Pluralism. Synthese, 198(20), 4801–4812. doi: 10.1007/s11229-019-02264-z
MacFarlane, J. (2004). In What Sense (If Any) Is Logic Normative for Thought? Recuperado de https://johnmacfarlane.net/normativity_of_logic.pdf
Mackenzie, J. (1989). Reasoning and logic. Synthese, 79(1), 99–117. doi: 10.1007/BF00873257
Mezzadri, D. (2015). Frege on the Normativity and Constitutivity of Logic for Thought. Philosophy Compass, 10(9), 583-591. doi: 10.1111/phc3.12248.
Winawer, J., Witthoft, N., Frank, M. C., Wu, L., Wade, A. R. y Boroditsky, L. (2007). Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(19), 7780–7785. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701644104
Pietroski, P. (2005). Events and Semantic Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Priest, G. (2006). Doubt Truth to be a Liar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quine, W. V. (1936). Truth by Convention. En Philosophical Essays for Alfred North Whitehead (pp. 90-124). London: Longmans, Green & Co.
Read S. (2006). Monism: The One True Logic. En D. Devidi y T. Kenyon (Eds.) A Logical Approach to Philosophy (pp. 193-209). Dordrecht: Springer.
Russell, B. (1956). Introducción a la filosofía matemática. En B. Russell. Obras escogidas. (pp. 67-365) Barcelona: Aguilar.
Santos, J. A.; Bernardi, L.S. y Nascimento, M. (2020). Algoritmos y sistemas de parentesco: aproximaciones etnomatemáticas en la formación de profesores indígenas. Bolema: Boletim de Educação Matemática, 34 (67), 628-650.
Sapir, E. (1949). Culture, Language and Personality. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Shapiro, S. (2014). Varieties of Logics. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Thibodeau, P. Hendricks, R. y Boroditsky, L. (2017). How Linguistic Metaphor Scaffolds Reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Science, 21(11), 852-863. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.07.001
Valin, Jr., R. (2005). Exploring the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511610578.
Wittgenstein, L. (1993). Philosophical Occasions 1912-1951. En J. Klagge y A. Nordmann (Eds.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Whorf, B. l. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eidos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
