The Roots of The Freedom Tree.

Hölderlin and Hegel Facing Rousseau

Authors

  • Gonzalo Santiago Rodriguez Universidad Nacional de Cuyo

Keywords:

Modern Philosophy, Freedom, Hölderlin, Rousseau

Abstract

Rousseau´s importance for the postkantian idealism has been poorly researched. Hidden by the Kantian interpretation, the work of the Geneva thinker seems to have no relevant influence. Departing from an interpretative analysis of the literary sources and a comparison of the literary sources, our paper aims to show, using Hölderlin and Hegel´s Tubingen and the immediately subsequent works (1791-1795), that Rousseau´s influence has a decisive importance to understand the artistic and religious program of our authors. This analysis will allow us to understand that Rousseau is not a philosopher, nor an enlightenment figure, but rather a wise man, the bringer of a practical doctrine whose main principle consisted in supreme human dignity and the idea of freedom interpreted as autonomy.

Author Biography

Gonzalo Santiago Rodriguez, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo

D. in Philosophy (UNCUYO), Specialist in Philosophy with Children and Youth (UNCUYO) and Diploma in Social Sciences (FLACSO). He is an effective Head of Practical Works at the Faculty of Education of the National University of Cuyo and a scholarship holder of the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research (CONICET). He is also co-director and researcher of projects accredited by the Secretariat of International Research and Graduate Studies of the National University of Cuyo. His research interests are modern and contemporary philosophy, with special emphasis on German idealism as well as the relationship between philosophy and education.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

References

Beck, A. (1982). Die legende vom Tübinger Freiheitsbaum. En Hölderlins Weg zu Deutschland. Fragmenten und Thesen. (pp. 46-54). Stuttgart: J.B.Metzler.

Bertaux, P. (1968). Hölderlin und die französische revolution. En Hölderlin Jahrbuch (Vol. 15, pp. 1-27). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr. Recuperado de https://www.hoelderlin-gesellschaft.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Dokumente/Jahrbuch_196768/196768_1.pdf

Bertaux, P. (1992). Hölderlin y la Revolución Francesa. M. Sarabia (trad.) Barcelona: Ediciones del Serval.

Binder, W. (1972). Einfürung in Hölderlins Tübinger Hymnem. En Hölderlin Jahrbuch (pp. 1-19). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

Boechenstein, B. (1966). Die Transfiguration Rousseaus in der deutschen Dichtung um 1800. En Jahrbuch der Jean Paul Gessellschaft 1 (pp. 101-116). Basel, C.

Boeder, H. (2014). Rousseau o la irrupción de la autoconciencia. Philosophia, 1, 13-35. L.E.Profili y G.S.Rodriguez (trad.). Recuperado de https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/6625.

Boeder, H. (2016). Die Letzte Epoche der Philosophie in ihrer Kern-Phase. (M. Zubiría & M. Brainard, eds.). Berlin: Dunkel & Humboldt.

Boeder, H. (2017a). In Officium Sapientae. Antología de Textos Filosóficos II . M. Zubiría (trad.) Mendoza: Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Recuperado de https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/objetos_digitales/8890/in-officium-sapientiae-ii-corr-.pdf

Boeder, H. (2017b). La memoria de sofia. M. Zubiría (trad.) En In Officium Sapientae. Antología de Textos Filosóficos II (pp. 79-101). Mendoza: Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Recuperado de https://bdigital.uncu.edu.ar/objetos_digitales/8890/in-officium-sapientiae-ii-corr-.pdf

Castellari, M. (2011). Friedrich Hölderlin. Hyperion nello specchio della critica. Milan: C.U.E.M. Recuperado de http://books.google.de/books?id=_W1qydcxSyIC

D´Hondt, J. (2013). Hegel. C. Pujol (trad.). Buenos Aires: Fábula.

De Angeli, M. (1995). Die Rolle des Einflusses von J. J. Rousseau auf die Herausbildung von Hegels Jugendideal: Ein Versuch, die «dunklen Jahre» (1789-1792) der Jugendenentwicklung Hegels zu erklären. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

De Angeli, M. (1996). Hegels Philosophie als Weisheitslehre: Beitrage zu einer neuen Interpretation des Jungen und des reifen Hegel. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.

De Angeli, M. (2021). L’applicazione della categoria della ’naturalità’ al campo dell’illuminamento dell’uomo comune. Recuperado de https://www.philosophyforfuture.org/it/news-167/calendario-incontri-centro-hegel.html

De Man, P. (1968). Hölderlins Rousseaubild. En Hölderlin Jahrbuch (pp. 180-208). Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

Ferrer, A. (2001). Holderlin ante la revolución. En Hölderlin. Poesía y Pensamiento (pp. 87-101). Madrid: Pre-textos.

Fulda, H. F. (1991). Rousseau , die Revolution und der junge Hegel. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

Gaier, U. (2011). Rousseau, Schiller, Herder, Heinse. En J. Kreuzer (Ed.), Hölderlin Handbuch. Stuttgart-Weimar: J.B.Metzler.

Grimm, J., & Grimm, W. (1971). Deutsches Wörterbuch. Recuperado de http://woerterbuchnetz.de/DWB/?sigle=DWB&mode=Vernetzung&lemid=GK04592#XGK04592

Grimsley, R. (1977). La filosofía de Rousseau. J. Rubio (trad.). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. (1970). Vorlesungen über die Philosophie der Geschichte (Vol. 12). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. (2021). Stammbuch Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel - OpenDigi. Recuperado http://idb.ub.uni-tuebingen.de/opendigi/Mh858#p=10

Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich. (1978). Escritos de Juventud. J.M. Ripalda (trad.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich. (1989). Gesammelte Werke 1. Frühe Schriften (Rheinisch-; F. Nicolin & G. Schüler, Eds.). Würzburg: Felix Meiner.

Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich. (2005). Introducciones a la Filosofía de la Historia Universal R. Cártago (trad.). Madrid: Istmo.

Hegel, George Wilhelm Friedrich. (2013). Lecciones sobre la Historia de la Filosofía III. W.Roces (trad.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Henrich, D. (1963). Leutwein über Hegel. Ein Dokument zu Hegels Biographie. En Hegel Studien 3 (pp. 39-77). Felix Meiner.

Henrich, D. (1971). Hegel im Kontext. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Henrich, D. (1991). Konstellationen. Probleme und Debatten am Ursprung der idealistischen Philosophie (1789-1795). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

Hoffman, T. S. (2014). Hegel. Una propedéutica. M. Maureira y K. Wrehde (trad.). Buenos Aires: Biblos.

Hölderlin, F. (1946). Sämliche Werke. Grosse Stuttgarter Ausagabe (Friedrich Beissner, Ed.). W.Kohlhammer.

Hölderlin, F. (1976). Ensayos. F. Martinez Marzoa (trad.). Madrid: Peralta Ediciones.

Hölderlin, F. (1990). Correspondencia Completa. H. Cortés y A. Leyte (trad.). Madrid: Hiperión.

Hölderlin, F. (2000). Hiperión o el eremita en Grecia. J. Muñariz (trad.). Madrid: Hiperión.

Hölderlin, F. (2001). Los Himnos de Tubinga. C. Durán y D. Innenarity (trad.). Madrid: Hiperión.

Innerarity, D. (1989). Dialéctica de la Revolución, Hegel, Schelling y Hölderlin ante la revolución francesa. Anuario Filosófico, 22(1), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.15581/009.22.1.35-54

Innerarity, D., & Durán, C. (2001). Mitología de la revolución. Los himnos de Tubinga. En Los himnos de Tubinga (pp. 7-41). Madrid: Hiperión.

Jaeschke, W. (2016). Hegel Handbuch. Leben, Werk, Schule. Kösel: J.B.Metzler.

Jamme, C. (1983). Ein ungelehrtes Buch. Die philosophische Gemeinschaft zwischen Hölderlin und Hegel in Frankfurt 1797-1800. Bonn: Bouvier.

Kaufmann, W. (1972). Hegel. V. Sánchez de Zabala (trad.). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Kondylis, P. (1979). Die entstehung der Dialektik. Eine Analyse der geistigen Entwicklung von Hölderlin, Hegel und Schelling bis 1802. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

Link, J. (1999). Hölderlin-Rousseau: Inventive Rückkehr. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Pinkard, T. (2002). Hegel. Una biografía. C. García Trevijano (Trad.). Madrid: Acento.

Profili, L. E. (2020). La idea de libertad en Jean Jacques Rousseau. Eidos, 32(32), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.14482/eidos.32.194

Rosenkranz, K. (1843). Aus Hegels Leben. Leipzig: Otto Wigang Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Rousseau, J. J. (1780). Les reveries du promeneur solitaire. En Collection complète des oeuvres,. Recuperado de www.rousseauonline.ch,

Rousseau, J. J. (1955). Emilio. Buenos Aires: Safian.

Rousseau, J. J. (1996). El Contrato Social. M.J. Villaverde (trad.). Barcelona: Altaya.

Rousseau, J. J. (2007). Julia, o la Nueva Eloísa P. R. Ortega (trad.). Madrid: Akal.

Rousseau, J. J. (2012). Discurso sobre las Ciencias y las Artes. Discurso sobre el origen de la Desigualdad entre los Hombres. M. Armiño (trad.). Madrid: Alianza.

Schiller, F. (2015). Lírica de pensamiento. M. Zubiría (trad.). Córdoba: Alción Editora.

Schneider, H., & Jamme, C. (1990). Der Weg zum System. Materialien zum jungen Hegel. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Slaby, R., & Grossman, R. (1977). Diccionario de las lenguas españolas y alemana. Barcelona: Herder.

Vieweg, K. (2005). «El gran teatro del mundo». La filosofía hegeliana de la historia como consideración pensante del acontecer humano con intención racional, liberal y cosmopolita. R. Cuartango (trad.). En Introducciones a la Filosofía de la Historia Universal. Madrid: Istmo.

Vöhler, M. (2011). Frühe Hymnem. En J. Kreuzer (Ed.), Hölderlin Handbuch (pp. 290-308). Stuttgart: J.B.Metzler.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-17

Issue

No. 39 (2023): January-June

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Eidos

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.