How a Town Became Massacrable. An Approach to Stigmatization, Hatred and Revenge in the Case of El Salado
Keywords:
necropower, necroaesthetics, economy of hate, affections, revengeAbstract
When looking at the El Salado massacre, we wonder about the factors that led this town of los Montes de María, in the context of the rural war in Colombia at the end of the 20th century, to become a military objective by the A.U.C (Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia), that is, to receive the brand or stigma of ‘guerrilla people’; that is, to become a massacrable town. This article tries to address this issue, thus analyzing the consequences of the FARC occupation since its entry into the region in the nineties. Ways like this Farean power had warmer logic and left little room for maneuver and freedom for the residents of El Salado; The saladeros had no choice or freedom, and cohabitation was confused with collaboration, passivity with belonging. In a second part, it reviews the effects of the brutal attack by the FARC against a certain group of
residents (especially, ranchers and the military); In a way, the 2000 massacre, carried out by the AUC, was an inordinately hateful response to excessive violence by the FARC in the years before the massacre. In this section, we talk about the hatred and
revenge that constitute elements that contributed decisively —among others— to the 2000 massacre. The elaborations on the economy of hate by Sara Ahmed (2015) and the elaborations of Laura Quintana on affects (2020 and 2021) will be fundamental.
References
Ahmed, S. (2015). La política cultural de las emociones. México: Libros UNAM.
Agamben, G. (2017). Homo sacer. El poder soberano y la vida desnuda. Buenos Aires. Adriana Hidalgo.
Anderson, B. (2009). Affective atmospheres. Emotion, Space and Society 2, (2009) 77–81.
Cavarero, A. (2009). Horrorismo. Nombrando la violencia contemporánea. Barcelona: Anthropos.
Comaroff, J., y Comaroff, J. (2009). Violencia y ley en la poscolonia: una reflexión sobre las complicidades Norte-Sur. Barcelona: Katz Ediciones.
Das, V. (2006). In the Region of Rumor. En: Life and Words. California: University of California Press.
Derrida, J. (2000). Estados de ánimo del psicoanálisis. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Derrida, J. (2012). Espectros de Marx. El estado de la deuda, el trabajo del duelo y la nueva internacional. Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
Freud, S. (2008). Obras Completas. Tomo I. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu editorial.
Foucault, M. (2014). Defender la sociedad. México: Fondo de cultura económica.
Foucault, M. (2016). Vigilar y castigar. Nacimiento de la prisión. Ciudad de México: Siglo XXI Editores.
Foucault, M. (2016a). La sociedad punitiva. México: Fondo de cultura económica.
Foucault, M. (2017). Historia de la sexualidad 1. La voluntad de saber. México: Siglo XXI.
Mbembe, A. (2011). Necropolítica. España: Melusina.
Mbembe, A. (2018). Políticas de la enemistad. España: NED Ediciones.
Nietzsche, F. (2005). Genealogía de la moral. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Nietzsche, F. (2011). Así Hablo Zaratustra. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Quintana, L. (2021). Rabia. Afectos, violencia, inmunidad. Barcelona: Herder Editorial.
Santamaría, J. (2020). La masacre de El Salado como paradigma de violencia soberana paramilitar. Eidos. Núm. 34 (2020): Número especial – Noviembre Recuperado de https://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/eidos/article/view/13850/pdf_672
Sarmiento, J. & Trejos, L. (2020). El Otro derecho. Estudios sobre reglas, burocracia de la guerra y su asimilación a la legalidad en el Caribe colombiano. Barranquilla: Universidad del Norte Editorial.
Serje, M. (2011). El revés de la Nación. Territorios salvajes, fronteras y tierras de nadie. Bogotá: Ediciones Uniandes.
Žižek, S. (2016). La permanencia en lo negativo. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Godot.
Informes Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica
Sanchez, G; otros. (2009). La masacre de El Salado: esa guerrra no era nuestra. Bogotá: CNMH.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eidos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
