Propiedades psicométricas de una escala de Depresión basada en el Modelo de los Cinco Factores
Keywords:
Depresión, Modelo de los Cinco Factores, Modelo de los Cinco Grandes, Modelo de Respuesta Graduada, Teoría de Respuesta al ÍtemAbstract
Se presenta el proceso de construcción de una escala para medir la faceta Depresión según el Modelo de los Cinco Factores. Se realizó una revisión de las definiciones teóricas y operacionales de autores relevantes de este modelo. Luego se elaboraron 15 ítems iniciales, 3 de los cuales fueron eliminados por jueces expertos. Los ítems conservados se administraron a 1222 adultos de población general residentes en el área metropolitana de Buenos Aires, Argentina (50.8% mujeres, edad media = 33.2 años y DE = 11.8 años). Se seleccionó aleatoriamente un 35% de casos para depurar el instrumento con un análisis factorial exploratorio. El 65% restante se utilizó para corroborar la estructura interna con un análisis factorial confirmatorio y para ajustar el Modelo de Respuesta Graduada de la Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem. Los resultados muestran que los 10 ítems de la versión definitiva conforman una estructura unidimensional con adecuada consistencia interna. Se aportan evidencias de validez concurrente con EPQ-RA y SCL-90-R. La Función de Información revela que la escala mide con precisión elevada y constante en un rango extenso del rasgo. Se concluye que la escala permite valorar de manera satisfactoria las diferencias individuales en la tendencia a experimentar afectos depresivos.
References
Abal, F. J. P., Lozzia, G. S, Aguerri, M. E., Galibert, M. S. & Attorresi, H.F. (2010). La escasa aplicación de la Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem en Tests de Ejecución Típica. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 19 (1) 111-122.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA:American Psychiatric Publishing.
Anglim, J. & Grant, S. (2016). Predicting Psychological and Subjective Well-Being from Personality: Incremental Prediction from 30 Facets Over the Big 5. J Happiness Stud, 17, 59–80. doi: 10.1007/s10902-014-9583-7.
Attorresi, H. ¸ Lozzia, G. S., Abal, ¸F. J. P., Galibert, M. S., & Aguerri, M. E. (2009). Teoría de respuesta al ítem. Conceptos básicos y aplicaciones para la medición de constructos psicológicos. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, 18, 179-188.
Beck, A., Rush, J., Shaw, B. & Emery, G. (1979). Terapia cognitiva de la depresión. Bilbao: Editorial Desclée de Brouwer.
Beck, A.T., Steer, R. A & Brown, G.K (2006). Inventario de Depresión de Beck (2da. Ed.). Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Byrne, B.M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basics, concepts, applications, and programming. Nueva York: Routledge.
Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. (2011). IRTPRO user's guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scienti?c Software International.
Casullo, M. (2004). Síntomas psicopatológicos en adultos urbanos. Psicología y Ciencia Social. 6 (1). 49-57.
Chen, W., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indices for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265-289. doi: 10.2307/1165285
Chioqueta, A. P. & Stiles, T. C. (2005). Personality traits and the development of depression, hopelessness, and suicide ideation. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1283–1291. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.08.010.
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6401_2
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (2008). NEO PI-R. Inventario de Personalidad NEO Revisado [Revised NEO Personality Inventory]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Derogatis, L. (1994). SCL-90-R. Symptom Checklist-90-R. Administration. Scoring and Procedures Manual. Minneapolis: National Computer System.
Disney, K. (2011). Personality Differences in Never-Married Versus Divorced Individuals In Later Life Using the NEO PI-R. All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 796. Recuperado de http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/796
Ellickson-Larew, S., Naragon-Gainey, K., & Watson, D. (2013). Pathological eating behaviors, BMI, and facet-level traits: The roles of conscientiousness, neuroticism, and impulsivity. Eating Behaviors, 14 (4), 428-431. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.06.015
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. Londres: Hodder and Stoughton.
Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth. public-domain. personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. En I. Mervielde. I. Deary. F. De Fruyt. & F. Ostendorf (Eds.). Personality Psychology in Europe. (Vol. 7. pp. 7-28). Tilburg. The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.
Hidalgo-Montesinos, M. D. & French, B. F. (2016). Una introducción didáctica a la Teoría de Respuesta al Ítem para comprender la construcción de escalas. Revista de Psicología Clínica con Niños y Adolescentes, 3 (2), 13-21.
Hofstee, W. K. B., Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the big five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163. doi: 10.1037/00223514.63.1.146
Huron, D. (2018). On the Functions of Sadness and Grief. En H. Lench (eds). The Function of Emotions (pp . 59-92). Springer: Cham. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77619-4_5
Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory: Development of the IPIP-NEO-120. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2014.05.003
Kang, T., & Chen, T. T. (2011). Performance of the generalized S?X2 item fit index for the graded response model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12 (1), 89–96. doi: 10.1007/s12564-010-9082-4
Kelley, K., & Pornprasertmanit, S. (2016). Confidence intervals for population reliability coefficients: Evaluation of methods, recommendations, and software for composite measures. Psychological Methods, 21, 69 – 92. doi:10.1037/a0040086
Lorenzo-Seva, U. & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2 A Comprehensive Program for Fitting Exploratory and Semiconfirmatory Factor Analysis and IRT Models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37, 497-498. doi: 10.1177/0146621613487794.
Luminet, O., Bagby, R. M., Wagner, H., Taylor, G. J. & Parker, J. D. A. (1999). Relation Between Alexithymia and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: A Facet-Level Analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73 (3), 345 - 358. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7303_4
Maples-Keller, J. L., Williamson, R. H., Sleep, C. E., Carter, N. T., Campbell, W. K. & Miller, J. D. (2017). Using Item Response Theory to Develop a 60-Item Representation of the NEO PI–R Using the International Personality Item Pool: Development of the IPIP–NEO–60. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101 (1), 4 – 15. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1381968
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., (2010). NEO Inventories professional manual. Odessa. FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Muñiz, J. (2018). Introducción a la Psicometría: teoría clásica y TRI. Madrid: Pirámide.
Muthén, L. & Muthén, B. (2010). Mplus User’s Guide, 6th Edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén y Muthén.
Naragon-Gainey, K. & Watson, D. (2014). Consensually Defined Facets of Personality as Prospective Predictors of Change in Depression Symptoms. Assessment, 21 (4), 387-403. doi: 10.1177/1073191114528030.
Nieto, M. D., Abad, F. J., Hernández-Camacho, A., Garrido, L. E., Barrada, J. R., Aguado, D. y Olea, J. (2017). Calibrating a new item pool to adaptively assess the Big Five. Psicothema, 29 (3), 390-395. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.391
Ormel, J., Jeronimus, B. F., Kotov, R., Riese, H., Bos, E. H., Hankin, B., et al., (2013). Neuroticism and common mental disorders: meaning and utility of a complex relationship. Clin. Psychol. Rev, 33 (5). 686–697. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.04.003
Parrot, P. G. (2016). Sorrow. En V. Zeigler-Hill. T.K. Shackelford (eds.). Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer International Publishing. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_554-1.
Penke, L., Denissen, J. J. A., & Miller, G. F. (2007). The evolutionary genetics of personality. European Journal o f Personality, 21, 549-587. doi: 10.1002/per.629.
Peters, G. J. Y. (2014). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: Why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. European Health Psychologist, 16 (2), 56–69. Recuperado de http://www.ehps.net/ehp/index.php/contents.
Rector, N. A., Bagby, R. M., Huta, V., & Ayearst, L. E. (2012). Examination of the trait facets of the five-factor model in discriminating specific mood and anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Res, 199 (2), 131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.04.027.
Reise, S. P. & Revicki, D.A. (2015). Handbook of Item Response Theory Modeling Applications to Typical Performance Assessment. Nueva York: Routledge
Reise, S. P. & Rodriguez, A. (2016). Item response theory and the measurement of psychiatric constructs: some empirical and conceptual issues and challenges. Psychol Med, 46 (10), 2025 - 2039. doi: 10.1017/ S0033291716000520.
Renshaw, K. D., Blais, R. K. & Smith, T. W. (2010). Components of Negative Affectivity and Marital Satisfaction: The Importance of Actor and Partner Anger. J Res Pers, 44 (3), 328 – 334. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2010.03.005
Røysamb, E., Nes, R. B., Czajkowski, N. O. & Vassend, O. (2018). Genetics, personality and wellbeing. A twin study of traits, facets and life satisfaction. Scientific Reports, 8 (1), 12298. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29881-x
Samejima, F. (2016). Graded response models. En W. J. van der Linden (Ed.), Handbook of Item Response Theory, Volume One (pp. 123-136). Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Sanchez, R. O. & Ledesma, R. D. (2009). Análisis psicométrico del Inventario de Síntomas Revisado (SCL-90-R) en población clínica. Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica, XVIII, 265-274.
Saucier, G. (2002). Orthogonal markers for orthogonal factors: The case of the big five. Journal of Research in Personality, 36 (1), 1 – 31. doi: 10.1006/jrpe .2001.2335.
Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: a facet-level analysis. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 30 (8), 1062 - 1075. doi: 10.1177/0146167204264292
Siegler, I. C. & Brummett, B. H. (2000). Associations Among NEO Personality Assessments and Weil-Being at Midlife: Facet-Level Analyses. Psychol Aging, 15 (4), 710 - 714. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.15.4.710
Simms, E. E. (2009). Assessment of the facets of the five factor model: Further development and validation of a new personality measure (Tesis doctoral inédita). Universidad de Iowa. Iowa City.
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2016). The Next Big Five Inventory (BFI2): Developing and Assessing a Hierarchical Model With 15 Facets to Enhance Bandwidth, Fidelity, and Predictive Power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110 (3), 127. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000096.
Spielberger, C. D., Agudelo, D., & Buela-Casal, G. (2008). Inventario de Depresión Estado/ Rasgo (IDER). Madrid: TEA Ediciones.
Squillace, M., Picón Janeiro, J., & Schmidt, V. (2013). Adaptación local del Cuestionario Revisado de Personalidad de Eysenck. Evaluar, 13, 19 – 37.
Drasgow, F., Stark, S., Chernyshenko, O. S., Nye, C. D., Hulin, C. L., & White, L. A. (2012). Development of the to support Army selection and classification decisions (Tech. Rep. No. 1311). Arlington, VA: U.S. Army Research. Recuperado de http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a564422.pdf
Steel, P., Schmidt, J., Bosco, F. A., & Uggerslev, K. L. (2019). The effects of personality on job satisfaction and life satisfaction: A meta-analytic investigation accounting for bandwidth–fidelity and commensurability. Human Relations, 72 (2), 217-247. doi: 10.1177/0018726718771465
Tackett, J. L. & Lahey, B. B. (2017). Neuroticism. En T. A. Widiger (Ed). The Oxford handbook of the five factor model. New York: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, N. & De Bruin, G. P. (2006). BTI. Manual of the Basic Traits Inventory. Johannesburgo. Sudáfrica: JvR.
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16 (2), 209-220. doi: 10.1037/a0023353.
Verduyn, P., Résibois, M., & Massar, K. (2017). Sadness. En V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. New York: Springer
Watson, D., Nus, E., & Wu, K. D. (2017). Development and Validation of the Faceted Inventory of the Five-Factor Model (FI-FFM). Assessment, 1–28. doi: 10.1177/1073191117711022
Widiger, T. A. (2009). Neuroticism. En M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Ed). Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 129-146). New York: Guilford Press.
Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Xi, C., Zhong, M., Lei, X., Liu, Y., Ling, Y., Zhu, X., Yao, S. & Yi, J1. (2018). Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of the Neuroticism Subscale of the NEO-PI. Front Psychol, 9 (1454). doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01454. eCollection 2018.
Published
Versions
- 2023-06-14 (3)
- 2022-01-20 (2)
- 2020-12-10 (1)
Issue
Section
License
The Editor and/or publisher submitting the current journal information, or article, hereby confirms: 1) the author’s participation in the work; 2) the author’s approval to be referred to as the author; and 3) the author’s acceptance to all the conditions included in the Copyright Assignment provision herein included. The author (hereinafter referred to as Assignor) hereby irrevocably transfers and assigns, at no cost, to the Revista Psicología del Caribe of the Psychology School at Universidad del Norte - ISSN: 2011-7485 - (hereinafter referred to as Assignee) all rights, titles and interests, including all copyrights in Colombia and throughout the World, related to the submitted article.
The Assignor acknowledges that he/she is the owner/creator and the article is original. The Assignor declares that the article had not, is not, or will not be submitted elsewhere for print or electronic publication. In such an event, the Editor of the Revista Psicología del Caribe should be notified, in writing, and his/her response is required prior to evaluating the submitted article. The Assignor swears there is no impediment that prevents this Copyright Assignment. The Assignor consents that he/she may be held accountable for any copyright violations, plagiarism, or any other claim that may surge.
In consideration of this provision, the Assignee is authorized to copy, reprint, distribute, publish, and commercialize the submitted article through electronic, digital, of paper means. However, the Assignee is obligated to comply with the moral rights of the author, as established in the Act 23 of 1982, art. 30.
All articles published in Psicología desde el Caribe and its contents are under Creative Commons license CC BY. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
