The New Rhetorics of Chaïm Perelman as a Theory of Practical Rationality [Spanish]

Authors

  • Moisés David Narváez Herrera Universidad de Cartagena

Keywords:

Formal logic, new rhetoric, non-demonstrative discourse, argumentation, practical rationality.

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to show how Chaïm Perelman’s new rhetoric proposal fundamentally constitutes a theory of practical rationality in an argumentative pers­pective. To develop this thesis, we proceed as follows: first, we describe the pragmatic turn that leads Perelman to point out the limits of formal deductivist logic in the field of values, in some of his youth texts; then, Perelman’s bet on new rhetoric is presented as a kind of application of rationality, developed in his Treaty of Argumentation and in some texts written after 1958; finally, the Perelmanian notion of reason is developed in the framework of legal argumentation, to show how, from this perspective, Perel­man is linked to the debate of the second half of the twentieth century known as the “doctrine of difficult cases in law”.

Author Biography

  • Moisés David Narváez Herrera, Universidad de Cartagena

     

    Universidad de Cartagena (Cartage­na, Colombia)

    mnarvaezh@unicartagena.edu.co

    Filósofo por la Universidad de Car­tagena (2010). Maestrante en Filo­sofía en la Universidad del Norte. Jefe de Departamento Académico del Programa de Filosofía de la Uni­versidad de Cartagena. Miembro del grupo de investigación Ápeiron. Trabaja las líneas de investigación en Filosofía de la ciencia, Retórica antigua y contemporánea, y Lógica y teorías contemporáneas de la ar­gumentación. Han publicado artícu­los especialmente sobre la obra del filósofo del derecho polaco Chaïm Perelman, entre ellos “Nociones confusas, filosofía y nueva retórica: un análisis desde el giro pragmático en Perelman” (2011), y traducciones de textos de este mismo autor, como Pragmatic arguments, en 2014.

     

References

<p>Bochénski, I. M. (1985). Historia de la lógica formal. Madrid, España: Gredos.</p><p><br />Castoriadis, C. (2002). Figuras de lo pensable. México D.F., México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.</p><p><br />Copi, I. &amp; Cohen, C. (1997). Introducción a la lógica formal. Madrid, España: Limusa.</p><p><br />Gómez, A. L (2004). La importancia de las nociones confusas. Santiago de Cali, Colombia: Ediciones Universidad del Valle.</p><p><br />García, P. (2013). Ensayos sobre argumentación jurídica. Bucaramanga, Colombia: Ediciones Universidad Industrial de Santander UIS.</p><p><br />Mortara, B. (1989). Manual de retórica. Madrid, España: Cátedra.</p><p><br />Papacchini, A. (1994). Filosofía y Derechos Humanos. Santiago de Cali, Colombia: Universidad del Valle.</p><p><br />Perelman, Ch. (1955) How do we apply reason to values. The Journal of Philosophy, 52(26),797-802. Doi: 10.2307/2022489</p><p><br />Perelman, Ch. (1964). De la justicia. México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.</p><p><br />Perelman, Ch. (1977) El razonamiento jurídico. Maracaibo, Venezuela: CEFD.</p><p><br />Perelman, Ch. (1988) La lógica jurídica y la nueva retórica. Madrid, España: Civitas.</p><p><br />Perelman, Ch. (1997) El imperio retórico. Retórica y argumentación. Bogotá, Colombia: Norma.</p><p><br />Perelman, Ch. (2003) First Philosophies and Regressive Philosophies. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 36(3),89-205. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40238150</p><p><br />Perelman, Ch. &amp; Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1989). Tratado de la argumentación. Nueva retórica. Madrid, España: Gredos.</p><p><br />Popper, K. R. (2010). La sociedad abierta y sus enemigos. Barcelona, España: Paidós.</p><p><br />Vega, L. &amp; Olmos, P. (2011). Compendio de lógica, argumentación y retórica. Madrid, España: Trotta.</p>
Cover

Downloads

Published

2018-12-03

Issue

No. 30 (2019): January-june

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.