Limit, Judgement and Otherness in Hegel [Spanish]

Authors

  • Stascha Rohmer Universidad de Medellín

Abstract

From Hegel's point of view, all that is real, and especially the living things, is a more or less developed subject. According to the German philosopher, subjects have the faculty to determine and realize themselves, which requires the faculty to judge. Unlike Kant, however, Hegel understands the judgment in an ontological way. On the one hand, he conceives subjects as totalities that are facing the world; on the other hand, he considers the world as something that belongs to the being of subjectivity. For Hegel, the problem of limit consists, therefore, in understanding the limit in an immanent and dialectical manner (as its counterpart), that is, as relation, as connection and mediation (Vermittlung).

Author Biography

Stascha Rohmer, Universidad de Medellín

Doctor en Filosofía por la Technische Universität Berlin (1999), es desde 2015 profesor de Filosofía en la Universidad de Medellín. Sus áreas de investigación son la metafísica, la antropología, la filosofía de la naturaleza y el Idealismo Alemán (especialmente Hegel).

References

<p>Hackenesch, C. (1978). Die Logik der Andersheit. Eine Untersuchung zu Hegels Begriff der Reflexion. Königstein: Athenäum.</p><p><br />Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Die Wissenschaft der Logik I. En E. Moldenhauer y K. M. Michel (Eds.), Gesammelte Werke (vol. 8). Fráncfort del Meno: Suhrkamp.</p><p><br />Hegel, G. W. F. (1971). Frühe Schriften. En E. Moldenhauer y K. M. Michel (Eds.), Gesammelte Werke (vol. 1). Fráncfort del Meno: Suhrkamp.</p><p><br />Hegel, G. W. F. (1986). Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften. En E. Moldenhauer y K. M. Michel (Eds.), Gesammelte Werke (vol. 9). Fráncfort del Meno: Suhrkamp.</p><p><br />Hegel, G. W. F. (1982). La Ciencia de la Lógica. [Traducido al español de Die Wissenschaft der Logik]. Traducción de A. Mondolfo y R. Mondolfo (Eds.), México D. F.: Ediciones Solar.</p><p><br />Henrich, D. (1971). Hegel im Kontext. Fráncfort del Meno: Suhrkamp.</p><p><br />Henrich, D. (1976). Hegels Grundoperation. En U. Guzzoni, B. Rang y L. Siep (Eds.), Der Idealismus und seine Gegenwart, Festschrift für Werner Marx (pp. 208-230). Hamburg: Meiner.</p><p><br />Horstmann, R. P. (1990). Wahrheit aus dem Begriff. Eine Einführung in Hegel. Fráncfort del Meno: Suhrkamp.</p><p><br />Iber, C. (1990). Metaphysik absoluter Relationalität. Eine Studie zu den beiden ersten Kapiteln von Hegels Wesenslogik. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter</p><p><br />Iber, C. (2002). Hegels Konzeption des Begriffs. En A. F. Koch (Ed.), Wissenschaft der Logik (pp. 182-202). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.</p><p><br />Koch, A. F. (1999). Die Selbstbeziehung der Negation in Hegels Logik. Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 53, 1-29. Recuperado de <br /> https://www.digizeitschriften.de/en/dms/img/?PID=PPN511864582_0053%7Clog6</p><p><br />Koch, A. F. (2000). Sein-Nichts-Werden. En A. Arndt y C. Iber (Eds.), Hegels Seinslogik. Interpretationen und Perspektiven (pp. 140-157). Berlin: Akademie Verlag.</p><p><br />Marcuse, H. (1975). Hegels Ontologie und die Grundlegung einer Theorie der Geschichtlichkeit. Fráncfort del Meno: Vittorio Klostermann.</p><p><br />Rohmer, S. (2013). Amor, el porvenir de una emoción. A. M. Rabe y G. Menéndez Torrellas (Trads.). Barcelona: Herder.</p><p><br />Rohmer, S. (2016), Die Idee des Lebens. Zum Begriff der Grenze bei Hegel und Plessner. Fríburgo/Múnich: Karl Alber.</p><p><br />Theunissen, M. (1980). Sein und Schein. Die kritische Funktion der Hegelschen Logik. Fráncfort del Meno: Suhrkamp.</p><p><br />Wiehl, R. (1965). Platos Ontologie in Hegels Logik des Seins. Hegel-Studien, 3, 157-180.</p>

Downloads

Published

2017-11-20

Issue

No. 28 (2018): January-June 2018

Section

Dossier: Figures of Otherness

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.