Manipulability: A Philosophical Comprehension of the History of Biochemical Receptors [Spanish]

Authors

  • Fiorela Alassia Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco
  • Mariana Córdoba Conicet-Universidad de Buenos Aires

Keywords:

Philosophy of biochemistry, biochemical receptors, scientific realism, manipulability, Ian Hacking.

Abstract

The postulation of the existence of biochemical receptors provides a satisfactory explanation for many biological processes at the cellular level, such as the mechanisms of action of most drugs with specific action. However, the concept of receptor was
long considered as lacking an objective referent, and even into the second half of the 20th century, there was still skepticism about its existence. By means of the philosophical debate between scientific realists and anti-realists, we will investigate wheter the question of realism can shed light on the history of the concept of biochemical receptor. We will evaluate which particular positions within the debate allow us to understand both the evolution of the concept of receptor and the scientific practice on receptors. We will argue that the case of receptors can be elucidated by accepting a scientific realism of entities, which considers manipulability as a criterion of existence –following Ian Hacking–. Our work will be guided by a strictly philosophical query:
Do biochemical receptors exist?

Author Biography

Fiorela Alassia, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco

Docente-investigadora del área de Epistemología y de Química, de la Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco.

References

Ahlquist, R. P. (1948). A Study of the Adrenotropic Receptors. American Journal of Physiology-Legacy Content, 153(3), 586-600. doi:10.1152/ajplegacy.1948.153.3.586

Ariëns, E. J. (1954). Affinity and Intrinsic Activity in the Theory of Competitive Inhibition. I. Problems and Theory. Archives Internationales de Pharmacodynamie et de Therapie 1, 99(1), 32-49. PMID: 13229418 Recuperado de: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13229418/

Avendaño, C. (2001). Introducción a la química farmacéutica (2ª ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Barwich, A. S. y Bschir, K. (2017). The Manipulability of What? The History of G-protein Coupled Receptors. Biology & Philosophy, 32(6), 1317-1339. doi: 10.1007/s10539-017-9608-9

Black, J. y Stephenson, J. (1962). Pharmacology of a New Adrenergic Beta-receptor-blocking Compound (Nethalide). The Lancet, 2, 311-314. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(62)90103-4

Black, J. (1989). Drugs from Emasculated Hormones: The Principle of Syntopic Antagonism. Science, 245(4917), 486-493. doi: 10.1126/science.2569237

Carman, C. (2016). Realismo científico. En C. E. Vanney, I. Silva y J. F. Franck (Eds.), Diccionario Interdisciplinar Austral. http://dia.austral.edu.ar/Realismo_científico

Clark, A. J. (1933). Mode of Action of Drugs on Cells. London: Edward Arnold.

Curtis, H., Barnes, S., Schnek, A. y Massarini, A. (2013). Curtis Biología (7ª. ed.). Panamericana.

De Lean, A., Stadel J.M. y Lefkowitz, R. L. (1980) A Ternary Complex Model Explains the Agonist-specific Binding Properties and the Adenylate Cyclase-coupled Beta-adrenergic Receptor. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 255, 7108-7117. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6248546/

Delgado Cirilo, A., Llombart, C. M. y Tamargo, J. J. (2003). Introducción a la química terapéutica. Díaz de Santos.

Ehrlich, P. (1990). Partial Cell Functions. Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, 31(1), 4-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1990.tb02737.x

Gaddum, J. H. (1943). Introductory Address. Part I. Biological Aspects: The Antagonism of Drugs. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 39, 323-332. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/1943/TF/tf9433900323

Hacking, I. (1996). Representar e intervenir. S. F. Martínez (trad.). México: Paidós.

Hacking, I. (1995). Scientific Realism about Some Chemical Entities. Foundations of Science, 1(4), 537–542. doi: 10.1007/bf00125785

Harré, R. (1996). From Observability to Manipulability: Extending the Inductive Arguments for Realism. Synthese, 108(2), 137-155. doi: 10.1007/BF00413494

Kobilka, B. (2013). The Structural Basis of G?protein?coupled Receptor Signaling (Nobel Lecture). Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 52(25), 6380-6388. doi: 10.1002/anie.201302116

Kukla, A. (1998). Studies in Scientific Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Langley, J. N. (1905). On the Reaction of Cells and of Nerve-endings, Chiefly as Regards the Reaction of Striated Muscle to Nicotine and to Curare. Journal of Physiology, 33, 374-413. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1905.sp001128

Laudan, L. (1981). A Confutation of Convergent Realism. Philosophy of Science, 48, 19-49. doi: 10.1086/288975

Maehle, A. H. (2004). Receptive Substances: John Newport Langley (1852-1925) and His Path to a Receptor Theory of Drug Action. Medical History, 48, 153-174. doi: 10.1017/S0025727300000090

Millikan, R. A. (1913). On the Elementary Electrical Charge and the Avogadro Constant. Physical Review, 2(2), 109-143. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.2.109

Niiniluoto, I. (1999). Critical Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Parascandola, J. (1974). The Controversy over Structure-activity Relationships in the Early Twentieth Century. Pharmacy in History, 16(2), 54-63. doi: 10.2307/41110008

Poel I., Goldberg D. (eds.) (2009). Philosophy and Engineering: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol. 2. Dordrecht: Springer.

Powell, C. E. y Slater, I. H. (1958). Blocking of Inhibitory Adrenergic Receptors by a Dichloro Analog of Isoproterenol. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 122, 480-488. https://jpet.aspetjournals.org/content/122/4/480.long

Prüll, C., Maehle, A. H. y Halliwell, R. F. (2009). A Short History of the Drug Receptor Concept. United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.

Psillos, S. (1999), Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. New York-Routledge.

Putnam, H. (1975). Mathematics, Matter and Method. Philosophical Papers. vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, H. (1978). Meaning and the Moral Sciences. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Rasmussen, S. G., Choi, H. J., Fung, J. J., Pardon, E., Casarosa, P., Chae, P. S., DeVree, B. T., Rosenbaum, D. M., Thian, F. S., Kobilka, T. S., Schnapp, A., Konetzki, I., Sunahara, R. K., Gellman, S. H., Pautsch, A., Steyaert, J., Weis, W. I. y Kobilka, B. (2011). Structure of a Nanobody-stabilized Active State of the ? 2 Adrenoceptor. Nature, 469(7329), 175-180. doi: 10.1038/nature09648

Rodbell, M., Birmbaumer, L., Posh, S. L. y Krans, H. M. (1971). The Glucagon-sensitive Adenylyl-cyclase System in Plasma Membranes of Rat Liver. V. An Obligatory Role of Guanyl-nucleotides in Glucagon Action. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 246, 1877-1882. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4328442/

Santos, R., Ursu, O., Gaulton, A., Bento, A. P., Donadi, R. S., Bologa, C. G., Karlsson, A., Al-Lazikani, B., Hersey, A., Oprea, T. I. y Overington, J. P. (2017). A Comprehensive Map of Molecular Drug Targets. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 16(1), 19-34. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2016.230

Silverman, R. B. (2004). The Organic Chemistry of Drug Design and Drug Action (2a ed.). Elsevier Academic Press.

Stephenson, R. P. (1956). A Modification of Receptor Theory. British Journal of Pharmacology, 11, 379-393. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1956.tb00006.x

Van Fraassen, B. (1996). La imagen científica. S. F. Martínez (trad.). Paidós.

Voet, D. y Voet, J. (2005). Bioquímica. S. Rondinone, D. Klajn y M. V. Preciado (trads.). Médica Panamericana.

Zeidler, P. y Sobczy?ska, D. (1995). The Idea of Realism in the New Experimentalism and the Problem of the Existence of Theoretical Entities in Chemistry. Foundations of Science, 1(4), 517-535. doi: 10.1007/BF00125784

Published

2022-02-13

Issue

Section

Articles