Dialogue in Gadamer and the Conformation of the Community of Human Life in Contemporary Democratic Societies
Keywords:
Dialogue, understanding, recognition, understanding experience, meaning and belongingAbstract
From Gadamer’s approach to dialogue, it is shown that when the interlocutors carry out the conversation in harmony with protecting the right of opinion and reciprocally recognizing the limits of risky points of view, it is feasible to configure a community of human life in mutual estimate and approve the validity of other judgments as answers that help with the interhuman process of common understanding. And in this realization of the dialogue thus a new creation of meaning takes place that with the participation of the plurality simultaneously carries out the updating of the usual way of carrying out the formation of a community of life. To the extent that the interlocutors understand their opinions in relation to the guiding question of the dialogue and recognize the finiteness of their points of view as possibilities among others, it contributes to the establishment of a community of human life in a completely different sense, transforming with this, in one way or another, the usual practices of relationship and social integration. First, the link between understandable experience and conversation is explained; and, secondly, the way in which Gadamer describes the hermeneutical assumption of belonging and its relationship with the creation of a new meaning that concerns the comprehensible experience of interhuman understanding in conversation is established.
References
Austin, J. L. (1971). Cómo hacer cosa con palabras. G. R. Carriós y E. A. Rabossi (trads.). Barcelona: Paidós.
Cuchumbé, N. J. (2010). La crítica de Taylor al liberalismo procedimental y a la racionalidad práctica moderna. Revista Ideas y Valores,
LIX(43), 33-49. Recuperado de: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3274867
Dottori, R. (2009). The Concept of Phronesis by Aristotle and the Beginning of Hermeneutic Philosophy. Revista Etica & Politica / Ethics &
Politics, XI(2009), 301-310. Recuperado de: https://www.openstarts.units.it/handle/10077/5215
Badge, J. (2018). The Democratic Theory of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Contemporary Political Theory, 17, 131–134. Doi:10.1057/s41296-017-0124-0
Gadamer, H. G. (1981). “Hermenéutica como filosofía práctica”. En La razón en la época de la ciencia (pp. 59-82). Barcelona: Alfa.
Gadamer, H. G. (1992). Verdad y método II. M. Olasagasti (trad.). Salamanca: Ediciones Sígueme.
Gadamer, H. G. (2002). Acotaciones hermenéuticas. A. Agud y R. Agapito (trads.). Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
Gadamer, H. G. (2012). Verdad y método. A. Agud y R. de Agapito (trads.). Salamanca: Ediciones Sígueme.
González, M. A. (2019). La participación de la escuela de Brentano en el Psycologismusstreit. Revista de Filosofía Aurora, 31(53), 482-502.
Doi:10.7213/1980-5934.31.053.DS06
Grondin, J. (2003). Introducción a Gadamer. Barcelona: Herder Editorial.
Gutiérrez, C. B. (2002). Temas de filosofía hermenéutica. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia.
Gutiérrez, C. B. (Ed.). (2004). No hay hechos, solo interpretaciones. Bogotá: Universidad de los Andes.
Habermas, J. (2003). Teoría de la acción comunicativa, I. M. J. Redondo (trad.). Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
Habermas, J. (2000). Aclaraciones a la ética del discurso. J. Mardomingo (trad.). Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
Perelman, CH. y Olbrechts, T. (1989). Tratado de la argumentación. La nueva retórica. J. Sevilla Muñoz (trad.). Madrid: Editorial Gredos.
Ricoeur, P. (2000). Del texto a la acción. P. Corona (trad.). Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica de Argentina.
Ricoeur, P. (2011). Finitud y culpabilidad. C. de Peretti, J. Díaz Galán y C. Meloni (trads.). Madrid: Editorial Trotta.
Santibáñez, C. (2020). Agente crítico, democracia deliberativa y el acto de dar razones. Revista Co-herencia, 17(32), 37-65. doi: 10.17230/
co-herencia.17.32.2
Searle, J. R. (2014). Creando el mundo social. La estructura de la civilización humana. J. Bostelmann (trad.). México, D. F.: Paidós.
Stiglitz, J. y Greenwald, B. (2014). La creación de la sociedad del aprendizaje. A. A. García Martínez (trad.). México, D.F.: Columbia.
Sullivan, R. (1989). Political Hermeneutics. The Early Thinking of Hans-Georg Gadamer. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Eidos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
