The Necessity of Contingency On Effective Reality in Hegel’s Science of Logic
Keywords:
Hegel, effective reality, absolute, logicAbstract
For Hegel, the supreme performance of thought consists in finding a terrain in which the primary dimensions of reality become evident. In this way, he develops one of his most interesting approaches in the Science of Logic, namely, effective reality. This article elaborates this view of reality by carefully commenting on what Hegel
develops therein. At the end, he shows that absolute reality is both differentiation into existing multiplicities and inversion of that contingency into absolute necessity, i.e., it sets itself as contingent in order to recover itself in necessity.
References
Biard, J., Buvat, D., Kervegan, J.-F., Kling, J.-F., Lacroix, A., Lecrivain, A., Slubicki, M. (1983). En: Introduction à la lecture de la Science de la logique de Hegel. Tomo 1 de 3, Paris I.
Burbidge, J. (1980). The Necessity of Contingency: An Analysis of Hegel’s Chapter on Actuality´ in the Science of Logic. En Steinkraus, W. E./Schmitz, K. I. (ed.). Art and Logic in Hegel‘s Philosophy. New Jersey: Sussex. pp. 201-217.
Fink-Eitel, H. (1978). Dialektik und Sozialethik. Kommentierende Untersuchungen
zu Hegels ,Logik‘. Meisenheim/Gl. di Giovanni, G. (1980). The Category of Contingency in the Hegelian Logic. En Steinkraus, W. E./Schmitz, K. I. Art and Logic in Hegel‘s Philosophy. New Jersey: Sussex. pp. 179-200.
Guzmán, L. (2006). El carácter contingente de la necesidad absoluto en la Ciencia de la lógica de Hegel. Ideas y valores, 54 (131),3-31. Hegel, G. W. F (iii). Phänomenologie des Geistes. Werke. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2016.
Hegel, G. W. F (vi). Wissenschaft der Logik II. Zweiter Teil. Die Subjektive Logik. Werke. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2016.
Henrich, D. (1973). Hegels Theorie über den Zufall. En Fetscher, Iring (ed.). Hegel in der Sicht der neueren Forschung. Darmstadt. pp. 161-187.
Houlgate, S. (1999). Hegel’s Critique of Foundationalism. En A. O’Hear (Ed.), German Philosophy Since Kant (pp. 25-46). Cambridge, Inglaterra: Cambridge University Press.
Kusch, Martin/Manninen, Juha. (1988). Hegel on Modalities and Monadology. En Knuuttila, S. (ed.). Modern Modalities. Studies of the History of Modal Theories from Medieval Nominalism to Logical Positivism. Dordrecht/Boston/London. pp. 109-177.
Longuenesse, B. (1982). L’effectivité de la Logique de Hegel. En Revue de Metaphysique et de Morale. (87), pp. 495-503.
Malabou, C. (2013). El porvenir de Hegel. Plasticidad, temporalidad, dialéctica. Lanús: Palinodia-La cebra.
Marcuse, H. (1932). Hegels Ontologie und die Grundlegung einer Theorie der Geschichtlichkeit. Fráncfort del Meno: Vittorio Klostermann.
McTaggart, J. M. E. (1910). A Commentary on Hegel’s Logic. Cambridge.
Noël, Georges (1897). La logique de Hegel. Paris.
Sandkaulen, B. (2007). Die Ontologie der Substanz, der Begriff der Subjektivität und die Faktizität des Einzelnen. Hegels reflexionslogische “Widerlegung der Spinozanischen Metaphysik”. En J. Stolzenberg & K. Amerkis (Eds), Metaphysik im deutschen Idealismus (pp. 235-275). Berlín, Alemania: De Gruyter.
Schmidt, G. (1973). Das Spiel der Modalitäten und die Macht der Notwendigkeit. Zu Hegels Wissenschaft der Logik. En: Fetscher, Iring (ed.). Hegel in der Sicht der neueren Forschung. Darmstadt. pp. 188-206.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Eidos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
