Atmoterrorism and Air Technologies: On a Performance of Space in Sloterdijk’s Philosophy
Keywords:
atmoterrorism, air conditioning, space, being-in-the-air, Sloterdijk.Abstract
The possibility of a certain performance of space in Sloterdijk’s theory of spheres is postulated. Such a performance would be an act of onto-technological convertibility, which replaces the orthodox notion of a space of Euclidean nature with that of a spatiality governed by the promise of the discipline of design or Air design. In this way,
Sloterdijk’s being-in-spheres would be better understood as being-in-air, especially if one considers that the asceticism of today’s Homo sapiens suggests an air conditioning centered on the comfort of the thermotope and technological management of air. For the same reason, and resorting to one of the mythological arguments of the Germanic philosopher, the concept of atmoterrorism (or war focused on the toxicity of the
environment) could be perfectly understood as a sort of titanotechnical revenge fruit of the theft of the sacred epistemic fire.
References
Alexiévich, S. (2015). Voces de Chernóbil. Barcelona: Penguin Random House Grupo.
Boos, T. & Runkel, S. (2018). Einführung: Die ungeheuerliche Raumphilosophie von Peter Sloterdijk. En Geographica Helvetica, 73(4), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-261-2018
Chamayou, G. (2016). Teoría del dron. Trad. L. Eiff. Buenos Aires: Futuro Anterior.
Consoli, D. (2015). Antropotécnicas del ejercicio y análisis de la subjetividad contemporánea en Peter Sloterdijk. En Soft Power, 2(1), 135-142. Recuperado de https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/1774
Ernste, H. (2018). The Geography of Spheres: An Introduction and Critical Assessment of Peter Sloterdijk’s Concept of Spheres. En Geographica Helvetica, 73(4), 273-284. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-73-273-2018
Garcia, P. O. (2016). Peter Sloterdijk, l’onto-géographie et le problème du dehors. En Géographie et cultures (100), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.4000/gc.4651
Grandazzi, G. (21 de abril de 2006). Commemorating the Chernobyl Disaster: Remembering the Future. Eurozine. Recuperado de https://www.eurozine.com/
commemorating-the-chernobyl-disaster-remembering-the-future/
Hermosa, A. (2011). El mal y el problema de la justicia en el mito de Prometeo de Hesíodo. Co-herencia, 8(14), 13-42. Recuperado de https://publicaciones.eafit.edu.co/index.php/co-herencia/article/view/275
Hidalgo, A. (2006). Criticar al ‘pensar’ de M. Heidegger desde el materialismo gnoseológico. Eikasia (3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.57027/eikasia.03.655
Huerta, R. (2016). Esferología, política y guerra en Peter Sloterdijk: para una aphrología de la guerra de cuarta generación. Tesis de Maestría. Ciudad de México: Universidad Iberoamericana.
Janicka, I. (2017). Theorizing Contemporary Anarchism: Solidarity, Mimesis
and Radical Social Change. Bloomsbury Academic.
Lee, T. & Wakefield-Rann, R. (2018): Design Philosophy and Poetic Thinking: Peter Sloterdijk’s Metaphorical Explorations of the Interior. Human Ecology Review, 24(2), 153-170. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/26785910
Noguera-Ramírez, C. (2017). La formación como ‘antropotécnica’. Aproximación al concepto de Peter Sloterdijk. Pedagogía y Saberes (47), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.17227/01212494.47pys23.30
Pitta, M. (2017). Do problema da espacialidade em Heidegger à esferologia de Sloterdijk. Synesis, 9(1), 141-164. Recuperado de https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6356717
Sloterdijk, P. (2003a). Esferas I. Burbujas. Madrid: Siruela.
Sloterdijk, P. (2003b). Temblores de aire. En las fuentes del terror. Valencia:
Pre-Textos.
Sloterdijk, P. (2006). Esferas III. Espumas. Madrid: Siruela.
Sloterdijk, P. (2011). Sin salvación: tras las huellas de Heidegger. Madrid: Akal.
Sloterdijk, P. (2012): Has de cambiar tu vida. Sobre antropotécnica. Valencia: Pre-textos.
Sordo, J. y Guzmán, R. (2013). Cultura y política en el proyecto filosófico de Peter Sloterdijk. Limitaciones y potencialidades de su esferología. Desacatos (41), 139-154. https://doi.org/10.29340/41.92
Sutherland, T. (2017). Ontological Co-belonging in Peter Sloterdijk’s Spherological Philosophy of Mediation. Paragraph, 40(2), 133-152. https://doi.org/10.3366/para.2017.0222
Tomaz, T. (2020). Crítica da tecnologia como metafísica: reflexão sobre a narrativa pós-natureza do antropoceno. Veritas, 65(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-6746.2020.1.36679
Turner, G. (2007). Las torres del olvido. Barcelona: Ediciones B.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Eidos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
