The Dynamic Sublime in Kant’s Third Critique [Spanish]

Authors

  • Matías Oroño Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to analyze the link between the dynamic sublime and the morality in the framework of Kant's critical thought. Our study will be res­tricted to the analysis of the dynamic sublime. We will defend the thesis according to which the feeling of the dynamic sublime is irreducible to the morality even if this feeling necessarily supposes the morality. Subsidiarily, we will try to indicate that the dynamic sublime implies a necessary reference to the own corporeality. Likewise, we will outline a hypothesis concerning the possibility of thinking the role of the own corporeality in the framework of the Kantian moral theory. The main conclusions of our analysis are the following: 1. the dynamic sublime and the morality are clearly differentiated spheres in Kant's thought; 2. the dynamic sublime supposes the morality.

Author Biography

Matías Oroño, Universidad de Buenos Aires - CONICET

Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Argentina). Actualmente es becario posdoctoral del CONICET, con lugar de trabajo en el Instituto de Filosofia Dr. Alejandro Korn de la Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la UBA. Su principal línea de investigación es el Idealismo trascendental de Kant, con particular énfasis en temas de filosofía teórica.

References

<p>Bond, E. J. (1983). Reason and Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Briese, O. (1996). Ethik der Endlichkeit. Zum Verweisungscharakter des Erhabenen bei Kant. En Kant-Studien, 87 (3), 325-347. Doi: 10.1515/ kant.1996.87.3.325</p><p>Budd, M. (1998). Delight in the Natural World: Kant on the Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature. Part III: The Sublime in Nature. En British Journal of Aesthetics, 38(3), 233-250. Doi: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/38.3.233</p><p>Burke, E. (1987). Indagación filosófica sobre el origen de nuestras ideas acerca de lo sublime y de lo bello. Traducción de Menene Gras Balaguer. Madrid: Tecnos.</p><p>Crowther, P. (1989). The Kantian Sublime. Oxford: Clarendon Press.</p><p>Elliot, R. (2006). Aesthetics, Imagination and the Unity of Experience. Burlington: Ashgate.</p><p>Giordanetti, P. (2005). Kant und die Musik. Würzburg: Königshausen &amp; Neumann.</p><p>Goodreau, J. (1998). The Role of the Sublime in Kant’s Moral Metaphysics. Washington D.C.: Council for Research in Values and Philosophy.</p><p>Jiménez Rodríguez, A. (2016). Una pregunta en torno a la división de la tabla kantiana de las categorías. En Nuevas perspectivas sobre la filosofía de Kant (pp. 13-22). Madrid: Escolar y Mayo Editores.</p><p>Kant, I. (1968). Kants Werke. Akademie Textausgabe. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.</p><p>Kant, I. (1969). La religión dentro de los límites de la mera razón. Traducción, prólogo y notas de Felipe Martínez Marzoa. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.</p><p>Kant, I. (1989). Los progresos de la metafísica. Traducción de Mario Caimi. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.</p><p>Kant, I. (1991). Crítica de la facultad de juzgar. Traducción de Pablo Oyarzún. Caracas: Monte Ávila Editores.</p><p>Kant, I. (2007). Crítica de la razón pura. Traducción, notas e introducción de Mario Caimi. Buenos Aires: Losada.</p><p>Kant, I. (2007). Crítica de la razón práctica. Traducción de J. Rovira Armengol. Buenos Aires: Losada.</p><p>Kant, I. (2007). Fundamentación de la metafísica de las costumbres. Traducción de Manuel García Morente. San Juan: Edición de Pedro M. Rosario Barbosa.</p><p>Lazaroff, A. (1980). The Kantian Sublime: Aesthetic Judgment and Religious Feeling. Kant-Studien, 71(2), 202-220. Doi:10.1515/ kant.1980.71.1-4.202</p><p>Lyotard, J. F. (1991). Leçons sur L’Analytique du sublime. Paris: Galilée.</p><p>Lyotard, J. F. (1987). El entusiasmo. Crítica kantiana de la historia. Traducción de Alberto Bixio. Barcelona: Gedisa.</p><p>McCloskey, M. (1987). Kant’s Aesthetic. New York: State University of New York Press.</p><p>Nagel, T. (1970). The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.</p><p>Nahm, M. (1956-57). Sublimity and the ’Moral Law’ in Kant’s Philosophy. Kant-Studien, 48(1-4), 502-24. Doi: 10.1515/kant.1957.48.1-4.502</p><p>Órdenes Azúa, P. (2016). Una posible explicación sobre la división de lo sublime en la tercera Crítica. En Nuevas perspectivas sobre la filosofía de Kant (pp. 267-274). Madrid: Escolar y Mayo Editores.</p><p>Park, K. H. (2009). Kant über das Erhabene. Rekonstruktion und Weiterführung der kritischen Theorie des Erhabenen Kants. Würzburg: Königshausen &amp; Neumann.</p><p>Pries, C. (ed.). (1989). Das Erhabene. Zwischen Grenzerfahrung und Größenwahn. Weinheim: VCH, Acta Humaniora.</p><p>Schaper, E. (1992). Taste, Sublimity and Genius: The Aesthetics of Nature and Art. En The Cambridge Companion to Kant (pp. 367-393). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Scheck, D. (2009). La doble naturaleza de lo sublime kantiano: entre el sacrificio estético y el placer moral. Methodus, 4, 61-103.</p><p>Scheck, D. (2012). El espectador y lo sublime: condiciones estéticas y exigencias éticas en Addison, Burke y Kant. Boletín de Estética, VIII(22), 31-71.</p><p>Sensen, O. (2009). Kant’s Conception of Human Dignity. En Kant Studien, 100 (3), 309-331. Doi: 10.1515/KANT.2009.018</p><p>Sullivan, R. (1994). An Introduction to Kant’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Sytsma, S. (1983). The Role of Achtung in Kant’s Moral Theory. En Auslegung, 19 (2), 117-122.</p><p>Timmons, M. (1985). Kant and the Possibility of Moral Motivation. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 23 (3), 377-398. Doi: 10.1111/j.2041- 6962.1985.tb00407.x</p><p>Uleman, J. (2010). An Introduction to Kant’s Moral Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Wood, A. (1999). Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Wood, A. (2008). Kantian Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.</p><p>Wenzel, C. H. (2005). An Introduction to Kant’s Aesthetics. Core Concepts and Problems. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.</p>

Downloads

Published

2017-06-13

Issue

No. 27 (2017): No. 27 July-december 2017

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.