El pragmatismo de Deweyan y el desafío de institucionalizar la justicia en circunstancias transitorias [Inglés]
Palabras clave:
Dewey, justicia, democracia, instituciones, violencia estatal, reconciliación, pragmatismo, relaciones internacionalesResumen
Durante los últimos treinta años, el programa de investigación de Justicia
Transicional (TJ) ha experimentado un periodo de transición, expandiéndose y consolidándose simultáneamente; en un sentido, expandir su alcance a la medición del impacto de TJ y la redefinición de “transicional” para incluir sociedades afectadas por una profunda injusticia social y económica; y en un segundo sentido, consolidar
su enfoque práctico para promover la democracia y la paz mediante el desarrollo de mejores prácticas para institucionalizar la TJ. Si bien ha habido avances en el diseño de nuevos mecanismos de TJ y en remediar la sub-teorización del concepto, hasta la
fecha se ha realizado un pequeño progreso comparativo al ofrecer un marco guía para el impulso de TJ para institucionalizar. La tesis de este artículo es que el pragmatismo
filosófico, específicamente el pragmatismo de Deweyan, ofrece una gran cantidad de recursos, un kit de herramientas virtual, para académicos y profesionales que desean diseñar instituciones amigables con los TJ dentro de las sociedades en transición.
Citas
Aboulafia, M. (2009, February 2). Obama’s Pragmatism and the Stimulus Package. Available at www.Up@Night.com.
Allais, L. (2012). Restorative Justice, Retributive Justice, and the South African Truth and Justice Commission. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 39(4), 331-363. Doi: 10.111/j.1088-963.2012.01211.x
Anderson, E. (2010). The Imperative of Integration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Andrieu, K. (2010). Civilizing Peacebuilding: Transitional Justice, Civil Society and the Liberal Paradigm. Security Dialogue, 41(5), 537–558. Doi: 10.1177%2F0967010610382109
Arthur, P. (2009). How ‘Transitions’ Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice. Human Rights Quarterly, 31, 321-367. Doi: 10.1353/hrq.0.0069
Balasco, L. M. (2013a). The International Criminal Court as a Human Security Agent. Praxis – The Journal of Human Security, 28, 46–67. Available at http://www.fletcher.tuffs.edu/praxis/~/media/fletcher/…/article3_Balasco_IC C.pdf
Balasco, L. M. (2013b). The Transitions of Transitional Justice: Mapping the Waves from Promise to Practice. Journal of Human Rights, 12, 198-216. Doi: 10.1080/14754835.2013.784858
Bell, C. (2009). Transitional Justice, Interdisciplinarity and the State of the ‘Field’ or ‘Non-Field’. The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3, 5-27. Doi: 10.1093/ijtj/ijn044
Bell, C., Campbell, C. & Aolain, F. N. (2004). Justice Discourses in Transition. Social and Legal Studies, 13(3), 305-328. Doi: 10.1177/0964663904044997
Birjandian, S. (2019). Rethinking Transitional Justice for the Twenty-first Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Borzutsky, S. (2017). Human Rights Policies in Chile: The Unfinished Struggle for Truth and Justice. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Buckley-Zistel, S., Beck, T.K., Braun, C. & Mieth, F., (Eds). (2014). Transitional Justice Theories. New York: Routledge.
Call, C. T. (2004). Is Transitional Justice Really Just? Brown Journal of World Affairs 1 (Fall/Winter), 101-113. Available at https://jstor.org/stable/24590500
Campbell, J. (1995). Understanding John Dewey. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Carothers, T. (2002). The End of the Transition Paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5-21. Doi: 10.1353/jod.2002.0003
Caspary, W. (2000). Dewey on Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Collins, C. (2010). Post-transitional Justice: Human Rights Trials in Chile and El Salvador. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
De Greiff, P. (2009). Articulating the Links between Transitional Justice and Development: Justice and social integration. In De Greiffe & Guthrie (Eds.), Transitional Justice and Development: Making Connections (pp. 28-75). New York: Social Science Research Council.
Denbel, J. D. (2013). Transitional Justice in the Context of Ethiopia. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 10, 78-83. Available at https://www.learntechlib.org/p/176569/article_176569.pdf
Dewey, J. (1996). The Collected Works of John Dewey: The Electronic Edition, L. A. Hickman (Ed). Charlottesville, VA: Intelex Corporation.
Dieleman, S., Rondel, D. & Voparil, C. (2017). Pragmatism and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Discursive Designs: Critical Theory and Political Institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 31(3), 656-679. Doi: 10.2307/2111287
Duthie, R. (2008). Toward a Development-Sensitive Approach to Transitional Justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2(3), 292-309. Doi: 10.1093/ijtj/ijn029
Eldridge, M. (2009). Adjectival and Generic Pragmatism: Problems and Possibilities. Human Affairs, 19, 10-18. Doi: 10.2478/v10023-009-0015-y
Eldridge, M. (2011). Linking Obama’s Pragmatism to Philosophical Pragmatism: Obama as a Pragmatic Democrat. Contemporary Pragmatism, 8(2), 113-121. Doi: 10.1163/18758185-90000205
Eldridge, M. (1998). Transforming Experience: John Dewey’s Cultural Instrumentalism. Nashville and London: Vanderbilt University Press.
Festenstein, M. (2017). Ideal and Actual in Dewey’s Political Theory. In Dieleman, S., Rondel, D. & Voparil, C. (Eds.), Pragmatism and Justice (pp. 97-114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Freeman, M. (2006). Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The End of History? The National Interest, 16, 209-224.
Gready, P. & Robins, S. (2014). From Transitional to Transformative Justice: A New Agenda for Practice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8(3), 339-361. Doi: 10.1093/IJTJ/IJU013
Hegel, G. W. F. (2018 [1807]). The Phenomenology of Spirit. T. Pinkard (Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
International Center for Transitional Justice (2014). ICTJ Three-Year Strategic Plan 2015-2018. Available at https://www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Strategic-Plan-2015-EN.PDF
International Center for Transitional Justice (2018). What is Transitional Justice? Available at http://www.ictj.org/en/tj/
Ish-Shalom, P. (2009). Theorizing Politics, Politicizing Theory, and the Responsibility that Runs between. Perspectives on Politics, 7(2), 303-316. Doi: 10.2307/40406932
Johnson, J. S. (2009). Inquiry and Education: John Dewey and the Quest for Democracy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Koopman, C. (2009). Pragmatism as Transition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kritz, N. (ed.) (1995). Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes. Washington D.C: United States Institute of Peace Press.
Kratchowil, F. (2019). A Pragmatic View of Practice in International Relations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia, International Studies. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lamont, C. K., Quinn, J. R., & Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2019). The Ministerialization of Transitional Justice. Human Rights Review, 20(1), 103-122. Doi: 10.1007/s12142-018-0528-0
Lixinski, L. (2021). Legalized Identities: Cultural Heritage Law and the Shaping of Transitional Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McAuliffe, P. (2017a). The Marginality of Transitional Justice within Liberal Peacebuilding: Causes and Consequences. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 9(1), 91-103. Doi: 10.1093/jhuman/huw022
McAuliffe, P. (2017b). Transformative Transitional Justice and the Malleability of Post-Conflict States. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
McEvoy, K., & McConnachie, K. (2013). Victims and Transitional Justice: Voice, Agency and Blame. Social & Legal Studies, 22(4), 489-513. Doi: I10.1177/0964663913499062
Murphy, C. (2015). Transitional Justice, Retributive Justice and Accountability for Wrongdoing. In C. Corradetti, N. Eisikovits and J. Rotondi (Eds.), Theorizing Transitional Justice (pp. 59-68). Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
Murphy, C. (2016). Transitional Justice: A Conceptual Map. In K. Watene and J. Drydyk (Eds.), Theorizing justice: Novel insights and future directions (pp. 33-50). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Murphy, C. (2017). The Conceptual Foundations of Transitional Justice. Cambridge University Press.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books. Oettler, A. (2017). Transitional Justice, Recognition, and Authoritative Power. ResearchGate. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319091695_Transitional_Justice_Recognition_and_
Authoritative_Power.
Olsen, Tricia D., Payne, Leigh A. & Reiter, Andrew G. (2010). Transitional Justice in Balance: Comparing Processes, Weighing Efficacy. Washington D.C: United States Institute for Peace.
Orford, A. (2006). Commissioning the Truth. Columbia Journal of Gender and Law, 15, 851-882. Doi: 10.7916/cjgl.v15i3.2534
Pappas, G. (2016). The Pragmatists’ Approach to Injustice. The Pluralist 11(1), 58-77. Doi: 10.5406/pluralist.11.1.0058
Posner, E. A., & Vermeule, A. (2004). Transitional Justice as Ordinary Justice. Harvard Law Review, 117(3), 761-825. Doi: 10.2307/4093461
Ralph, J. (2018). What Should be Done? Pragmatic Constructivist Ethics and the Responsibility to Protect. International Organization, 72(1), 173-203. Available at http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/114443/3/Ralph%20IO%20accepted%20version.pdf
Ralston, S. J. (2008). Intelligently Designing Deliberative Healthcar Forums: Dewey’s Metaphysics, Cognitive Science and a Brazilian Example. Review of Policy Research, 25(6), 619-630. Doi: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2008.00367_4.x
Ralston, S. J. (2009). On the Freedom Agenda and the George Bush Legacy: A Philosophical Inquiry. In M.O. Grossman and R.E. Matthews (Eds.), Perspectives on the George W. Bush Legacy (pp. 137-151). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ralston, S. J. (2010). Can Pragmatists be Institutionalists? John Dewey Joins the Non-ideal/Ideal Theory debate. Human Studies, 33(1), 65-84. Doi: 10.1007/s10746-010-9138-9
Ralston, S. J. (2011a). Interdisciplinarity: Some lessons from John Dewey. American Dialectic, 1(2), 309-321. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274297024_Interdisciplinarity_Some_Lessons_from_John_Dewey
Ralston, S. J. (2011b). Obama’s Pragmatism in International Affairs. Contemporary Pragmatism, 8(2), 81-98. Doi:10.1163/18758185-90000203
Ralston, S. J. (2011c). Pragmatism in International Relations Theory and Research. Eidos 14(2), 72-105. Available at http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S1692-8572011000100004&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
Ralston, S. J. (2012). Educating Future Generations of Community Gardeners. Critical Education, 3(3), 1-17. Available at https://ices.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/article/view/182349
Ralston, S. J. Ed. (2013). Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations: Essays for a Bold New World. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Ralston, S. J. (2019a). Lest We Forget: John Dewey and Remembrance
Education. Dewey Studies, 3(1), 78-92. Available
at http://www.johndeweysociety.org/dewey-studies/files/2020/03/04_dewey-studies_3.1.pdf
Ralston, S. J. (2019b). Dewey’s Political Technology from an Anthropological Perspective. Education and Culture, 35(1), 29-48. Available at https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/eandc/vol35/iss1/art3/
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ross, F. C. (2010). An Acknowledged Failure: Women, Voice, Violence and the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission. In Shaw, Waldorf & Hazan (Eds.), Localizing transitional justice: Interventions and priorities after mass violence (pp. 69-91). Stanford: Stanford
University Press.
Ryder, J. (2009). American Philosophy and Foreign Policy. In Self and Society: European Pragmatist Forum, 4 (pp. 141-159). New York: Rodopi Press.
Sarkin, J. (1999). Transitional Justice and the Prosecution Model: The Experience of Ethiopia. Law, Democracy and Development, 3(2), 253-266. Available at https://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA10281055_137
Schultz, B. (2009). Obama’s Political Philosophy: Pragmatism, Politics, and the University of Chicago. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 39(2), 127-173. Doi: 10.1177/0048393109332453
Sharp, D. N. (2013). Interrogating the Peripheries: The Preoccupations of Fourth Generation Transitional Justice. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 26, 149-179. Available at https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4126/7a9e906008abe1064bce45fcb4c6e3ebc936.pdf
Sharp, D. N. (2019). What Would Satisfy us? Taking Stock of Critical Approaches to Transitional Justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 13(3), 570-589. Doi: 10.1093/ijtj/ijz018
Shields, P. M. (2017). Jane Addams: Progressive Pioneer of Peace, Philosophy, Sociology, Social Work and Public Administration. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Shields, P. M. & J. Soeters. (2013). Pragmatism, Peacekeeping, and the Constabulary Force. In Ralston, S. J. (Ed.), Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations: Essays for a Bold New World (pp. 87-110). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Shook, J. (2013). Dewey’s Ethical Justification for Public Deliberation Democracy. Education and Culture, 29(1), 3-26. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5703/educationculture.29.1.3
Sikkink, K. (2011). The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions are Changing World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Sikkink, K. & Walling, C. B. (2007). The Impact of Human Rights Trials in Latin America. Journal of Peace Research, 44(4), 427-445. Doi: 10.1177/0022343307078953
Slye, R. C. (2002). The Legitimacy of Amnesties under International Law and General Principles of Anglo-American Law: Is a Legitimate Amnesty Possible? Virginia Journal of International Law, 42, 173-247. Available at https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1433&context=faculty
Snyder, J. & L. Vinjamuri. (2003). Trials and Errors: Principles and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice. International Security, 28(3), 5-44. Doi: 10.1162/016228803773100066
Sunstein, C. (2008, September). The Empiricist Strikes Back: Obama’s Pragmatism Explained. The New Republic 10. Available at https://newrepublic.com/article/64019/the-empiricist-strikes-back.
Teitel, R. (2002). Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teitel, R. (2003). Transitional Justice Genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 16, 69-94. Available at https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1339&context=fac_articles_chapters
Uprimny, R., & Saffon, M.P. (2006). Transitional Justice, Restorative Justice,and Reconciliation. Some Insights from the Colombian Case. “Coming to Terms” with Reconciliation—Working Paper Library, 1-16. Available at https://cdn.dejusticia.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/
fi_name_recurso_55.pdf
Urueña, R. & Prada, M.. (2004). Advocacy and Scholarship in the Study of International War Crime Tribunals and Transitional Justice. Annual Review of Political Science 7, 345-362. Doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104755
Urueña, R. & Prada, M.. (2018). Transitional Justice and Economic Policy. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14(1), 397-410. Doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101317-031259
van Zyl, P. (1999). Dilemmas of Transitional Justice: The Case of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Journal of International Affairs, 52(2), 647-667. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/24358058
Waddington, D. I. (2008). John Dewey: Closet Conservative? Paideusis 17(2), 51-63. Available at journals.sfu.ca› index.php› pie› article›download
Weber, E. T. (2013). On Pragmatism and International Relations. In Ralston, S. J. (Ed.), Philosophical Pragmatism and International Relations: Essays for a Bold New World (pp. 25-49). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Westbrook, R. (1991). John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2010). Truth Commissions and Transitional Societies: The Impact of Human Rights and Democracy. New York: Routledge.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Eidos
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los autores que publican en Eidos acuerdan los siguientes términos:
1. El Autor retiene el copyright del "Artículo", por el cual se entiende todos los objetos digitales que pueden resultar de la subsiguiente publicación o distribución electrónica.
2. En conformidad con los términos de este acuerdo, el autor garantizará a Eidos como Editor el derecho de la primera publicación del artículo.
3. El Autor le concederá al Editor un derecho perpetuo y no-exclusivo, así como una licencia de la misma clase, de publicar, archivar y hacer accesible el Artículo parcial o totalmente en todos los medios conocidos o por conocerse, derecho y licencia que se conocen como Creative Commons License Deed. Atribución-NoComercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0 o su equivalente que para efectos de eliminar toda duda, le permite a otros copiar, distribuir, y transmitir el Artículo bajo las siguientes condiciones: (a) Atribución: Se deben reconocer los créditos de la obra de la manera especificada por el Autor a Eidos, pero no de una manera que sugiera que tiene su apoyo o que apoyan el uso que hace de su obra. (b) No Comercial: No se puede utilizar el Artículo para fines comerciales.
4. El Autor puede realizar otros acuerdos contractuales no comerciales para la distribución no exclusiva de la versión publicada del Artículo (v. gr. ponerlo en un repositorio institucional o publicarlo en un libro) con la condición de que haga el debido reconocimiento de su publicación original en Eidos.
5. A los Autores se les permite y Eidos promueve publicar en línea (online) la versión pre-impresa del Artículo en repositorios institucionales o en sus páginas web, antes y durante la publicación, por cuanto que puede producir intercambios académicos productivos, así como una mayor citación del Artículo publicado (ver The Effect of Open Access). Dicha publicación durante el proceso de producción y en la publicación del Artículo se espera que se actualice al momento de salir la versión final, incluyendo una referencia a la URL de Eidos.
