Covering Chavez in u. S. Media: how elite reports a controversial international figure
Palabras clave:
Objetividad, esfera pública, fuentes noticiosas, cubrimiento periodístico, parcialidadResumen
Hasta qué punto las voces que entran en conflicto con las posiciones hegemónicas son escuchadas en las noticias de cubrimiento internacional y cómo estos patrones del discurso público cambian a medida que nuevos sucesos se develan. Este texto analiza los artículos publicados sobre el presidente venezolano Hugo Chávez en un periódico elitista de Estados Unidos durante el periodo 2001-2002. Se efectuó el análisis de contenido de 65 artículos que pertenecían a tres períodos (antes, durante y después del golpe de Estado). Se halló que las voces anti-chavistas predominaban en los discursos de la esfera pública, hasta que un golpe militar ilegal lo removió del poder y, posteriormente, las voces pro-chavistas ganaron mayor espacio en la cobertura del líder venezolano.
Citas
Bagdikian, B. (2004). The new media monopoly. Boston: Beacon Press.
Bennett, L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103-125.
Bennett, L., Pickard, V., Iozzi, D., Schroeder, C., Lagos, T., Caswell, C. (2004).
Managing the public sphere: Journalistic construction of the great globalization debate. Journal of Communication, 54(3), 437-455.
Brown, J., Bybee, C., Wearden, S., & Straughan, D. (1989). Invisible power: Newspaper news sources and the limits of diversity. Journalism Quarterly, 64, 45-54.
Campbell, D. (2002, April 22). The coup. The Guardian. Available online:http://www.guardian.co.uk/venezuela/story/0,,858084,00.html.
Chavez departs (2002, April 13). Hugo Chavez departs. The New York Times, p. 16.
Covering Chavez (2003, June 13). NPR’s On the Media (transcribed edition). Available online: www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/transcripts_061303_chavez.html.
Curran, J. (1991). Mass media and democracy: A reappraisal. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 82-117). New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.
Dahlgren, P. (1995). Television and the public sphere. London: Sage
Dickson, S. (1992, Autumn). Press and U.S. policy toward Nicaragua, 1983-1987: A study of the New York Times and Washington Post. Journalism Quarterly, 69, 562-571.
Entman, R. (2004). Projecting the news: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gandy, Jr., O. (1982). Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what’s news. New York: Pantheon.
Gaventa, J. (1980). Power and powerlessness. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hallin, D. (1994). We keep America on top of the world. New York: Routledge.
Hallin, D. (1986). The “uncensored war”: The media and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hallin, D., & Mancini, P. (2004b). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hallin, D., Manoff, R., & Weddle, J. (1993). Sourcing patterns of national security reporters. Journalism Quarterly, 70(4), 753-766.
Herman, E., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent. New York: Pantheon.
Kim, S. (2000, Winter). Making a difference: U.S. press coverage of the Kwangju and Tiananmen pro-democracy movements. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 345-365.
Lichter, S., Rothman, S., & Lichter, L. (1986). The media elite: America’s new powerbrokers. Bethesda, MD: Adler and Adler.
McChesney, R. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
McCombs, M., & Bell, T. (1996). The agenda-setting role of mass communication, In M. Salwen & D. Stacks (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 93-110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Niven, D. (2005). An economic theory of political journalism. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(2), 247-263.
Picard, R. (1998). Media concentration, economics, and regulation. In D. Graber, D. McQuail & P. Norris (Eds.), The politics of news: The news of politics (pp. 193-217).
Profile (2005, Oct. 13). Profile: Hugo Chavez. BBC News Online. Available online: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/3517106.stm
Profile (2002, Dec. 5). Profile: Hugo Chavez. BBC News Online. Available online: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1925236.stm
Reese, S., Grant, A. & Danielian, L. (1994). The structure of news sources on television: A network analysis of “CBS News”, “Nightline”, “MacNeil/Lehrer”, and “This Week with David Brinkley”. Journal of Communication, 44, 84-107.
Salwen, M. (1995). News of Hurricane Andrew: The agenda of sources and the sources’agendas. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 72(4), 826-840.
Schaefer, T. (1997). Persuading the persuaders: Presidential speeches and editorial opinion. Political Communication, 14, 97-111.
Schudson, M. (1989). The sociology of news production. Media, Culture & Society, 11, 263-282.
Sigal, L. (1973). Reporters and officials. Lexington, MA: DC Heath.
Slevin, P. (2002, April 13). Chavez provoked his removal, U.S. officials say. Washington Post, A17.
Sullivan, K. (2005, March 15). Chavez casts himself as the anti-Bush. Washington Post, p. A1. Available online: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/articles/A35193-2005Mar14.html.
Tierney, J. (2005, Nov. 8). The idiots abroad. The New York Times, p. A 27.
Tift, S. & Jones, A. (1999). Behind the New York Times. New York: Random House.
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
Valenzuela, A. (2002, April 16). Bush’s betrayal of democracy. Washington Post, p. A19.
Venezuela’s breakdown (2002, April 14). Washington Post, p. B6.
Zoch, L. & Turk, J. (1998). Women making news: Gender as a variable in source selection and use. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75(4), 762-775.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Investigación & Desarrollo provee acceso libre a su contenido a quienes se registren en la página web bajo el principio de que hacer disponible gratuitamente investigación al público, apoya a un mayor intercambio de conocimiento global.
Se ejecuta bajo Licencia Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0.
Ni el envío, ni el procesamiento de los artículos implica costos para los autores o instituciones de las cuales hacen parte.