SENTIDO DE PROPRIEDADE EM CRIANÇAS: BASES EVOLUCIONISTAS

Authors

  • Angela DONATO Donato Oliva Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Keywords:

propiedad, niños, desarrollo cognitivo, inferencia

Abstract

El sentido de propiedad refleja la comprensión y el juicio de las personas con respecto a la apropiación y el uso de los recursos disponibles. Desde un enfoque evolutivo, los objetivos de este trabajo fueron realizar un análisis teórico sobre la ontogénesis del sentido de la propiedad, buscando describir los criterios utilizados por los niños para asignar propiedades a alguien y presentar una hipótesis explicativa de que existe una ventaja adaptativa en esta capacidad. Las conclusiones preliminares sugieren que los niños, en diferentes culturas, utilizan criterios variables para emitir juicios e inferencias sobre la posesión y la propiedad, y que el surgimiento temprano de esta habilidad desempeñaría un papel importante en las interacciones sociales, como minimizar los conflictos derivados de disputas de recursos.

Author Biography

Angela DONATO Donato Oliva, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

Professora Universitária do Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.

Professora Universitária do Instituto de Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

References

Referencias

Aharoni E., Kleider-Offutt H. M., Brosnan S. F., Watzek J. (2018) Justice at any cost? The impact of cost-benefit salience on criminal punishment judgments. Behavior Science & the Law. http://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2388

Blake, P. R., Ganea, P. A., & Harris, P. L. (2012). Possession is not always the law: With age, preschoolers increasingly use verbal information to identify who owns what. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 259-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.008

Boyer, P. (2015). How natural selection shapes conceptual structure: Human intuitions and concepts of ownership. Em S. Laurence & E. Margolis (Eds.), The Conceptual Mind: New Directions in the Study of Concepts (pp. 185-200). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Brosnan, S. F. (2011). Property in nonhuman primates. In H. Ross & O. Friedman (Eds.), Origins of ownership of property. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 9–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.293

Brosnan, S. (2013). Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates. PNAS, 10(2), pp. 10.416 -10.423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301194110

Davy, B. (2019). 'Dehumanized housing' and the ideology of property as a social function. Planning Theory, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219848469

DeScioli, P., Karpoff, R., & De Freitas J. (2017). Ownership dilemmas: the case of finders versus landowners. Cognitive Science, 41(3), 502-522. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12486

DeScioli, P., Rosa, N. M., & Gutchess, A. H. (2015). A memory advantage for property. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 411-423. http://dx.doi:10.1177/147470491501300205

Du Plessis, P. (2015). Borkowski's textbook on Roman Law (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Friedman, O., & Neary, K. R. (2008). Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition, 107, 829–849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.002

Friedman, O., Neary, K. R., Defeyter, M. A., & Malcolm, S. L. (2011). Ownership and object history. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 79–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.298

Friedman, O. & Ross, H. (2011). Twenty-one reasons to care about the psychological basis of ownership. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.292

Friedman, O., Van de Vondervoort, J. W., Defeyter, M. A. & Neary, K. R. (2013). First Possession, History, and Young Children´s Ownership Judgments. Child Development, 84(5): 1519–1525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12080

Gelman, S. A., Manczak, E. M., Was, A. M., & Noles, N. S. (2015). Children seek historical traces of owned objects. Child Development, 87(1), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12453

Goulding, B. W., & Friedman, O. (2018). The development of territory-based inferences of ownership. Cognition, 177, 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.013

Hay, D.F., Nash, A., & Pedersen, J. (1983). Interaction between six-month-old peers. Child Development, 54, 557–562. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130042

Huh, M. and Friedman, O. (2017). Young children’s understanding of the limits and benefits of group ownership. Developmental Psychology, 53, 686-697. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000284

Kalish, C. W. & Anderson, C. D. (2011). Ownership as a social status. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 65-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.297

Kanngiesser, P., Köymen, B., Tomasello, M. (2017). Young children keep, and mostly expect others to keep, their promises. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 159, 140-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.004

Kim, S., & Kalish, C. W. (2009). Children’s ascriptions of property rights with changes of ownership. Cognitive Development, 24, 322–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.03.004

Krier, J. E. (2015). Of Property Rights and Rights to Property. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 41(3): 589-600. https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/1782

Kummer, H. & Cords, M. (1991). Cues of ownership in long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. Animal Behaviour, 42, 529-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80238-6

Levene, M., Starmans, C., & Friedman, O. (2015). Creation in judgments about the establishment of ownership. Jounal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 103-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.011

Li, V., Shaw, A., & Olson, K. (2013). Ideas versus labor: What do children value in artistic creations. Cognition, 127, 38-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.001

Locke, J. (1997). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Roger Woolhouse, New York: Penguin Books. (Obra original publicada em 1682) http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020

McDermott, C. H. & Noles, N. S. (2018). The role of age, theory of mind, and linguistic ability in children’s understanding of ownership. PLoS One 13(10): e0206591. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206591

Macedo, L. O. (2012). Direitos de Propriedade e o Desenvolvimento Econômico das Etnias Indígenas Brasileiras: instituições e a emergência da ordem. Economic Analysis of Law Review, 3(1), 57-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v3n1p57-71

Nancekivell, S. E., & Friedman, O. (2017). “Because it’s hers”: When preschoolers use ownership in their explanations. Cognitive Science, 41, 827-843. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12358

Nancekivell, S.E., Friedman, O., & Gelman, S.A. (2019). Ownership matters: People possess a naïve theory of ownership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.008

Neary, K. R., & Friedman, O. (2014). Young children give priority to ownership when judging who should use an object. Child Development, 85, 326–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12120

Neary, K. R., & Friedman, O. (2014). Young children give priority to ownership when judging who should use an object. Child Development, 85, 326–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12120

Neary, K. R., Friedman, O., & Burnstein, C. L. (2009). Preschoolers infer ownership from “control of permission.” Developmental Psychology, 45, 873-876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014088

Noles, N.S., Keil, F.C., Bloom, P., & Gelman, S.A. (2012). Children’s and adults’ intuitions about who is entitled to own things. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 12, 265-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342076

Oliva, A. D. (2015). Origens evolutivas dos transtornos mentais e terapia cognitivo-comportamental. Em C. B. Neufeld, E. M. Falcone & B. Rangé (Eds.), PROCOGNITIVA: Programa de atualização em terapia cognitivo-comportamental, Vol. 2, (pp. 9-60). Porto Alegre: ArtMed Panamericana.

Oliva, A. D. (2018). Modularidade Mental. Em M. E. Yamamoto & J. J. Valentova (Eds.), Manual de Psicologia Evolucionista (pp. 98-119). Natal: EDUFRN.

Olson, K. R., & Shaw, A. (2011). ‘‘No fair, copycat!’’: What children’s response to plagiarism tells us about their understanding of ideas. Developmental Science, 14, 431–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00993.x

Pesowski, M. L. & Friedman, O. (2015). Preschoolers and toddlers use ownership to predict basic emotions. Emotion, 15, 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000027

Pesowski, M. L. & Friedman, O. (2016). Preschoolers use emotional reactions to infer relations: the case of ownership. Cognitive Development, 40, 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.08.006

Pesowski, M. L. & Friedman, O. (2018). Using versus liking: young children use ownership to predict actions but not to infer preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 169, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.007

Pesowski, M. L., Kanngiesser, P., Friedman, O. (2019). Give and take: Ownership affects how 2 - and 3-year olds allocate resources. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 185, 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.04.011

Rakoczy, H., & Schmidt, M. F. (2013). The early ontogeny of social norms. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 17-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12010

Rochat, P., Robbins, E., Passos-Ferreira, C., Oliva, A. D., Dias, M. D. G., & Guo, L. (2014). Ownership reasoning in children across cultures. Cognition, 132, 471-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.014

Ross, H. S. (2013). Effects of ownership rights on conflicts between toddler peers. Infancy, 18, 256–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00121.x

Rossano, F., Fiedler, L., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Preschoolers’ understanding of the role of communication and cooperation in establishing property rights. Developmental Psychology, 51(2), 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038493

Rossano, F., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children’s understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition, 121(2), 219-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.007

Shaw, A. & Olson, K. (2015). Whose idea is it anyway? The importance of reputation in acknowledgement. Developmental Science, 18, 502-509. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12234

Shaylene, E. N., Friedman, O. Gelman, S. (2019). Ownership Matters: People Possess a Naïve Theory of Ownership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(2), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.008

Tibble, L. & Carvalho, S. (2018). Rethinking the evolution of property and possession: A review and methodological proposition. Evolutionary Anthropology, 27(6), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21748

Van de Vondervoort, J. W., Meinz, P., & Friedman, O. (2017). Children’s judgments about ownership rights and body rights: evidence for a common basis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 155, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.007

Verkuyten, M. & Martinovic, B. (2017). Collective psychological ownership and intergroup relations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1021-1039, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706514

Zebian, S., & Rochat, P. (2012). Judgment of land ownership by young refugee Palestinian and US children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 449-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025412450526

Published

2020-06-03 — Updated on 2022-01-19

Versions