SENTIDO DE PROPRIEDADE EM CRIANÇAS: BASES EVOLUCIONISTAS
Keywords:
propiedad, niños, desarrollo cognitivo, inferenciaAbstract
El sentido de propiedad refleja la comprensión y el juicio de las personas con respecto a la apropiación y el uso de los recursos disponibles. Desde un enfoque evolutivo, los objetivos de este trabajo fueron realizar un análisis teórico sobre la ontogénesis del sentido de la propiedad, buscando describir los criterios utilizados por los niños para asignar propiedades a alguien y presentar una hipótesis explicativa de que existe una ventaja adaptativa en esta capacidad. Las conclusiones preliminares sugieren que los niños, en diferentes culturas, utilizan criterios variables para emitir juicios e inferencias sobre la posesión y la propiedad, y que el surgimiento temprano de esta habilidad desempeñaría un papel importante en las interacciones sociales, como minimizar los conflictos derivados de disputas de recursos.
References
Referencias
Aharoni E., Kleider-Offutt H. M., Brosnan S. F., Watzek J. (2018) Justice at any cost? The impact of cost-benefit salience on criminal punishment judgments. Behavior Science & the Law. http://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2388
Blake, P. R., Ganea, P. A., & Harris, P. L. (2012). Possession is not always the law: With age, preschoolers increasingly use verbal information to identify who owns what. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 259-272. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2012.06.008
Boyer, P. (2015). How natural selection shapes conceptual structure: Human intuitions and concepts of ownership. Em S. Laurence & E. Margolis (Eds.), The Conceptual Mind: New Directions in the Study of Concepts (pp. 185-200). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Brosnan, S. F. (2011). Property in nonhuman primates. In H. Ross & O. Friedman (Eds.), Origins of ownership of property. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 9–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.293
Brosnan, S. (2013). Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates. PNAS, 10(2), pp. 10.416 -10.423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1301194110
Davy, B. (2019). 'Dehumanized housing' and the ideology of property as a social function. Planning Theory, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219848469
DeScioli, P., Karpoff, R., & De Freitas J. (2017). Ownership dilemmas: the case of finders versus landowners. Cognitive Science, 41(3), 502-522. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12486
DeScioli, P., Rosa, N. M., & Gutchess, A. H. (2015). A memory advantage for property. Evolutionary Psychology, 13, 411-423. http://dx.doi:10.1177/147470491501300205
Du Plessis, P. (2015). Borkowski's textbook on Roman Law (5th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Friedman, O., & Neary, K. R. (2008). Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession? Cognition, 107, 829–849. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.002
Friedman, O., Neary, K. R., Defeyter, M. A., & Malcolm, S. L. (2011). Ownership and object history. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 79–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.298
Friedman, O. & Ross, H. (2011). Twenty-one reasons to care about the psychological basis of ownership. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.292
Friedman, O., Van de Vondervoort, J. W., Defeyter, M. A. & Neary, K. R. (2013). First Possession, History, and Young Children´s Ownership Judgments. Child Development, 84(5): 1519–1525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12080
Gelman, S. A., Manczak, E. M., Was, A. M., & Noles, N. S. (2015). Children seek historical traces of owned objects. Child Development, 87(1), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12453
Goulding, B. W., & Friedman, O. (2018). The development of territory-based inferences of ownership. Cognition, 177, 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.013
Hay, D.F., Nash, A., & Pedersen, J. (1983). Interaction between six-month-old peers. Child Development, 54, 557–562. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1130042
Huh, M. and Friedman, O. (2017). Young children’s understanding of the limits and benefits of group ownership. Developmental Psychology, 53, 686-697. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000284
Kalish, C. W. & Anderson, C. D. (2011). Ownership as a social status. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 65-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cd.297
Kanngiesser, P., Köymen, B., Tomasello, M. (2017). Young children keep, and mostly expect others to keep, their promises. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 159, 140-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.004
Kim, S., & Kalish, C. W. (2009). Children’s ascriptions of property rights with changes of ownership. Cognitive Development, 24, 322–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.03.004
Krier, J. E. (2015). Of Property Rights and Rights to Property. Ohio Northern University Law Review, 41(3): 589-600. https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/1782
Kummer, H. & Cords, M. (1991). Cues of ownership in long-tailed macaques, Macaca fascicularis. Animal Behaviour, 42, 529-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80238-6
Levene, M., Starmans, C., & Friedman, O. (2015). Creation in judgments about the establishment of ownership. Jounal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 103-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.011
Li, V., Shaw, A., & Olson, K. (2013). Ideas versus labor: What do children value in artistic creations. Cognition, 127, 38-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.001
Locke, J. (1997). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Roger Woolhouse, New York: Penguin Books. (Obra original publicada em 1682) http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020
McDermott, C. H. & Noles, N. S. (2018). The role of age, theory of mind, and linguistic ability in children’s understanding of ownership. PLoS One 13(10): e0206591. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206591
Macedo, L. O. (2012). Direitos de Propriedade e o Desenvolvimento Econômico das Etnias Indígenas Brasileiras: instituições e a emergência da ordem. Economic Analysis of Law Review, 3(1), 57-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.18836/2178-0587/ealr.v3n1p57-71
Nancekivell, S. E., & Friedman, O. (2017). “Because it’s hers”: When preschoolers use ownership in their explanations. Cognitive Science, 41, 827-843. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12358
Nancekivell, S.E., Friedman, O., & Gelman, S.A. (2019). Ownership matters: People possess a naïve theory of ownership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.008
Neary, K. R., & Friedman, O. (2014). Young children give priority to ownership when judging who should use an object. Child Development, 85, 326–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12120
Neary, K. R., & Friedman, O. (2014). Young children give priority to ownership when judging who should use an object. Child Development, 85, 326–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12120
Neary, K. R., Friedman, O., & Burnstein, C. L. (2009). Preschoolers infer ownership from “control of permission.” Developmental Psychology, 45, 873-876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014088
Noles, N.S., Keil, F.C., Bloom, P., & Gelman, S.A. (2012). Children’s and adults’ intuitions about who is entitled to own things. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 12, 265-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12342076
Oliva, A. D. (2015). Origens evolutivas dos transtornos mentais e terapia cognitivo-comportamental. Em C. B. Neufeld, E. M. Falcone & B. Rangé (Eds.), PROCOGNITIVA: Programa de atualização em terapia cognitivo-comportamental, Vol. 2, (pp. 9-60). Porto Alegre: ArtMed Panamericana.
Oliva, A. D. (2018). Modularidade Mental. Em M. E. Yamamoto & J. J. Valentova (Eds.), Manual de Psicologia Evolucionista (pp. 98-119). Natal: EDUFRN.
Olson, K. R., & Shaw, A. (2011). ‘‘No fair, copycat!’’: What children’s response to plagiarism tells us about their understanding of ideas. Developmental Science, 14, 431–439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00993.x
Pesowski, M. L. & Friedman, O. (2015). Preschoolers and toddlers use ownership to predict basic emotions. Emotion, 15, 104-108. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000027
Pesowski, M. L. & Friedman, O. (2016). Preschoolers use emotional reactions to infer relations: the case of ownership. Cognitive Development, 40, 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.08.006
Pesowski, M. L. & Friedman, O. (2018). Using versus liking: young children use ownership to predict actions but not to infer preferences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 169, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.12.007
Pesowski, M. L., Kanngiesser, P., Friedman, O. (2019). Give and take: Ownership affects how 2 - and 3-year olds allocate resources. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 185, 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.04.011
Rakoczy, H., & Schmidt, M. F. (2013). The early ontogeny of social norms. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 17-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12010
Rochat, P., Robbins, E., Passos-Ferreira, C., Oliva, A. D., Dias, M. D. G., & Guo, L. (2014). Ownership reasoning in children across cultures. Cognition, 132, 471-484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.04.014
Ross, H. S. (2013). Effects of ownership rights on conflicts between toddler peers. Infancy, 18, 256–275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00121.x
Rossano, F., Fiedler, L., & Tomasello, M. (2015). Preschoolers’ understanding of the role of communication and cooperation in establishing property rights. Developmental Psychology, 51(2), 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038493
Rossano, F., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children’s understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition, 121(2), 219-227. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.007
Shaw, A. & Olson, K. (2015). Whose idea is it anyway? The importance of reputation in acknowledgement. Developmental Science, 18, 502-509. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12234
Shaylene, E. N., Friedman, O. Gelman, S. (2019). Ownership Matters: People Possess a Naïve Theory of Ownership. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(2), 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.008Tibble, L. & Carvalho, S. (2018). Rethinking the evolution of property and possession: A review and methodological proposition. Evolutionary Anthropology, 27(6), 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21748
Van de Vondervoort, J. W., Meinz, P., & Friedman, O. (2017). Children’s judgments about ownership rights and body rights: evidence for a common basis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 155, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.10.007
Verkuyten, M. & Martinovic, B. (2017). Collective psychological ownership and intergroup relations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1021-1039, https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617706514
Zebian, S., & Rochat, P. (2012). Judgment of land ownership by young refugee Palestinian and US children. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36, 449-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0165025412450526
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-01-19 (2)
- 2020-06-03 (1)
Issue
Section
License
The Editor and/or publisher submitting the current journal information, or article, hereby confirms: 1) the author’s participation in the work; 2) the author’s approval to be referred to as the author; and 3) the author’s acceptance to all the conditions included in the Copyright Assignment provision herein included. The author (hereinafter referred to as Assignor) hereby irrevocably transfers and assigns, at no cost, to the Revista Psicología del Caribe of the Psychology School at Universidad del Norte - ISSN: 2011-7485 - (hereinafter referred to as Assignee) all rights, titles and interests, including all copyrights in Colombia and throughout the World, related to the submitted article.
The Assignor acknowledges that he/she is the owner/creator and the article is original. The Assignor declares that the article had not, is not, or will not be submitted elsewhere for print or electronic publication. In such an event, the Editor of the Revista Psicología del Caribe should be notified, in writing, and his/her response is required prior to evaluating the submitted article. The Assignor swears there is no impediment that prevents this Copyright Assignment. The Assignor consents that he/she may be held accountable for any copyright violations, plagiarism, or any other claim that may surge.
In consideration of this provision, the Assignee is authorized to copy, reprint, distribute, publish, and commercialize the submitted article through electronic, digital, of paper means. However, the Assignee is obligated to comply with the moral rights of the author, as established in the Act 23 of 1982, art. 30.
All articles published in Psicología desde el Caribe and its contents are under Creative Commons license CC BY. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
