This is an outdated version published on 2022-01-20. Read the most recent version.

An Exploratory Study of the Relation between Cognitive Style and Metacognitive Monitoring in a Sample of Colombian University Students

Authors

Antonio P. Gutierrez de Blume Georgia Southern University
Diana Marcela Montoya Londoño Universidad de Caldas
Christian Hederich Martinez Universidad Pedagógica Nacional

Keywords:

Cognitive Styles, Calibration Accuracy and Bias, Intellectual Style, Metacognitive Monitoring

Abstract

References

Biggs, J. B. (1978). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 266–279. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1978.tb03013.x Boldt, A., Gardelle, V., & Yeung, N (2017). The Impact of evidence reliability on sensitivity and bias in decision confidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performan, 43(8), 1520-1531. doi:10.1037/xhp0000404 Blais, A., Thompson, M., & Baranski, J. (2005). Individual differences in decision processing and confidence judgments in comparative judgment tasks: The role of cognitive styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(7), 1701–1713. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.11.004 Buratti, S., Allwood, C., & Kleitman, S. (2013). First- and second-order metacognitive judgments of semantic memory reports: The influence of personality traits and cognitive styles. Metacognition & Learning, 8(1), 79–102. doi: 10.1007/s11409-013-9096-5 Curry, L. (1983). An organization of learning styles theory and constructs. ERIC Doc. 235: 185. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED235185 Díaz-Granados, F., Kantillo, K., & Polo, A. (2000). Relación entre el nivel de pensamiento y el estilo cognitivo dependencia-independencia de campo en estudiantes universitarios. Psicología desde el Caribe, 5, 176-196. http://rcientificas.uninorte.edu.co/index.php/psicologia/article/view/761/5262 Díaz, M., Cuevasanta, D., Grau, L., & Curione, K. (2014). Estudio del estilo cognitivo de estudiantes de psicología e ingenieria. Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportameinto, 6(2), 35-43. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v6.n2.7444">10.32348/1852.4206.v6.n2.7444</a> Entwistle, N. (1981). Styles of teaching and learning: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers, and lecturers. Taylor & Francis Group. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315067506" target="_blank">10.4324/9781315067506 </a> Fleming, S., Massoni, S., Gajdos, T., & Vergnaud, J. (2016). Metacognition about the past and future: Quantifying common and distinct influences on prospective and retrospective judgments of self-performance. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 1, 1-12. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nc/niw018">10.1093/nc/niw018</a> Gregorc, A. F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership,36, 234–236. https://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_197901_gregorc.pdf Gutierrez, A. P., & Schraw, G. (2015). Effects of strategy training and incentives on students’ performance, confidence, and calibration. Journal of Experimental Education, 83(3), 386–404. doi:10.1080/00220973.2014.907230 Gutierrez, A. P., Schraw, G., Kuch, F., & Richmond, A. S. (2016). A two-process model of metacognitive monitoring: Evidence for general accuracy and error factors. Learning and Instruction, 44, 1-10. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.006">10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.006</a> Gutierrez de Blume, A. P., & Montoya Londoño, D. M. (2020). Relationship between personality factors and metacognition in a sample of students in the last semester of training in baccalaureate degree programs in education in Colombia. Educación y Humanismo, 22(39), 1-20. doi:10.17081/eduhum.22.39.4048 Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 160–170. doi: <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.160" target="_blank">10.1037/0022-0663.92.1.160</a> Hadwin, A. F., & Webster, E. A. (2013). Calibration in goal setting: Examining the nature of judgments of confidence. Learning and Instruction, 24, 37–47. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.10.001 Hederich, C. (2007). Estilo cognitivo en la dimensio?n de dependencia-independencia de campo: influencias culturales e implicaciones para la educacio?n. Bogota?: Fondo Editorial Universidad Pedago?gica Nacional. https://ddd.uab.cat/record/37852 Hederich-Martínez, C., & Camargo-Uribe, A. (2016). Cognitive style and educational performance: The case of public schools in Bogotá, Colombia. Educational Psychology, 36(4), 719–737. doi: <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/01443410.2015.1091916" target="_blank">10.1080/01443410.2015.1091916</a> Honey, P., & Munford, A. (1992). The manual of learning styles. Psychology Press. https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Manual_of_Learning_Styles.html?id=CkiTQgAACAAJ Kagan, J. (1966). Developmental studies in reflection and analysis. In Kidd, A. H., & Rivoire, J. L. (Eds.), Perceptual development in children, (pp. 487-522). International University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1980-11745-001 Jia, S., Zhang, Q., & Li, S. (2014). Field dependence–independence modulates the efficiency of filtering out irrelevant information in a visual working memory task. Neuroscience, 278, 136–143. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.07.075 Kleitman, S., & Stankov, L. (2001). Ecological and Person-Oriented Aspects of Metacognitive Processes in Test-Taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(3), 321–341. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.705">10.1002/acp.705</a> Keren, G. (1991). Calibration and probability judgments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Psychologica, 77(2), 217–273. doi: <a title="Persistent link using digital object identifier" href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(91)90036-Y" target="_blank">10.1016/0001-6918(91)90036-Y</a> López, O., Hederich, C., & Camargo, A (2012). Logro de aprendizaje en ambientes hipermediales: andamiaje autorregulador y estilo cognitivo. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 44(2), 13-26. doi:<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.14349%2Frlp.v44i2.1028?_sg%5B0%5D=D0UlZHpbEoWjyx7vKO1JM2BPLvqhq9zQtkYoPqwjuI5Jc0coQDPBPNEDBrBg_s2SviTQSvqgSrCShAS-_v97IjOsBg.I0SO1G2q3p0ZnJ7ZVP0Rn9qAJDSdm0WL6MWd12ZG0uaHYBHFwMVXT2jqqCvEVX8iNuXCAPgNHYd0g2ycCB5gxw">10.14349/rlp.v44i2.1028</a> López-Vargas, O., Ibáñez-Ibáñez, J., & Racines-Prada, O. (2017). Students’ metacognition and cognitive style and their effect on cognitive load and learning achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 145–157. <a href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/26196126">http://www.jstor.org/stable/26196126</a> López-Vargas, O., Ibañez-Ibáñez, J., & Chiguasuque-Bello, E. (2014). El estilo cognitivo y la fijacio?n de metas de aprendizaje en ambientes computacionales. Pensamiento Psicológico, 12(1), 133-148. doi:10.11144/Javerianacali.PPSI12-1.ecfm Maki, R. (1998). Metacomprehension of text: influence of absolute confidence level on bias and accuracy. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 38, 223-248. doi: 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60188-7. Marchand, G., & Gutierrez, A. (2012). The role of emotion in the learning process: Comparisons between online and face-to-face learning settings. The Internet and Higher Education 15(3), 150-160. doi:<a href="https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.1016%2Fj.iheduc.2011.10.001?_sg%5B0%5D=WIyqSxp18rFX7rLqT19RtrqN2heHaDULCKmbDo7qrmqgyLbl64BUou_LoJQSiIwroKC337MfhrL9xBeP18OyvOTIAg.W_5HoUr-9QoAQce086QLBixMZoaQ7wR6D-32B2jCxsuxPnzX43KOtiA2rS0GNC0kOr9bJsA0QNGvglYOOhnHLQ">10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.10.001</a> Marchand, G. C., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2017). Processes involving perceived instructional support, task values, and engagement in graduate education. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85, 87-106. doi: 10.1080/00220973.2015.1107522 Marton, F. (1976). What does it take to learn? Some implications on an alternative view of learning. In Entwistle, N. J. (ed.), Strategies for research and development in higher education, (pp. 200-222). Swets and Zeitlenger. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED359206.pdf Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive styles: An integrated model. Educational Psychology, 7(4): 251–268. doi: 10.1080/0144341870070401 Miyake, A., Friedman, N., Rettinger, D., Shah, P., & Hegerty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 621–640. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.621. Miyake, A., Witzki, A. H., & Emerson, M. J. (2001). Field dependence–independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the hidden figures test. Memory, 9(4-6), 445–457. doi:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210143000029" target="_blank">10.1080/09658210143000029</a> McKeachie, W., & Svinicki, M. (2013). McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers. Wadsworth Cengage Learning. https://www.cengage.com/c/mckeachie-s-teaching-tips-14e-mckeachie/9781133936794/ Nelson, T. O., & Dunlosky, J. (1991). When people’s judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the “Delayed-JOL Effect”. Psychological Science, 2, 267-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.14679280.1991.tb00147.x. Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy. Metacognition and Learning, 1(2), 159–179. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6">10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6</a> Quiles, C., Verdoux, H., & Prouteau, A. (2014). Assessing metacognition during a cognitive task: Impact of “on-line” metacognitive questions on neuropsychological performances in a non-clinical sample. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 20(5), 547-554. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617714000290">doi:10.1017/S1355617714000290</a> Rittschof, K. (2008). Field dependence–independence as visuospatial and executive functioning in working memory: implications for instructional systems design and research. Education Tech Research Dev, 58(1), 99–114. doi: 10.1007/s11423-008-9093-6 Rhodes, M, & Castel, A. (2008). Memory predictions are influenced by perceptual information: Evidence for metacognitive illusions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(4), 615-625. doi: <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0013684" target="_blank">10.1037/a0013684</a> Sadler-Smith, E. (2012). Metacognition and Styles. In L-F. Zhang, R. Sternberg, & S. Rayner (Eds.), Handbook of intellectual styles. Preferences in cognition, learning, and thinking (pp.153-172). Springer Publishing. https://www.springerpub.com/handbook-of-intellectual-styles-9780826106674.html Schmeck, R. R. (1983). Learning style of college students. In Dillon, R. F., & Schmeck, R. R. (Eds.), Individual differences in cognition (pp. 233-279). Academic. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-2118-5_12 Schraw, G. (2009). Measuring metacognitive judgments. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 415–429). Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203876428 Schraw, G., Kuch, F., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2013). Measure for measure: Calibrating ten commonly used calibration scores. Learning and Instruction, 24, 48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.007 Schraw, G., & Roedel, T. D. (1994). Test difficulty and judgment bias. Memory & Cognition, 22, 63–69. doi: <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3758/BF03202762" target="_blank">10.3758/BF03202762</a> Slavin, R. E. (2000). Educational psychology: Theory and practice. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/program/Slavin-Educational-Psychology-Theory-and-Practice-plus-My-Lab-Education-with-Pearson-e-Text-Access-Card-Package-12th-Edition/PGM2005318.html Sternberg, R. J., & Williams, W. M. (2002). Educational psychology. Pearson. https://www.pearson.com/us/higher-education/program/Sternberg-Educational-Psychology-2nd-Edition/PGM28179.html Swe, M., & Saleh, I. (2010). New Science of learning: Exploring the future of education. In M. Khine, S. Swe, & M. Issa (Eds.), New Science of learning: cognition, computers, and collaboration in education (pp. 593–604). Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781441957153 Tinajero, C., Castelo, A., Guisande, A., & Páramo, F. (2011). Adaptive teaching and field dependence-independence: Instructional implications. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 43(3), 497-510. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-30513-008 Weber, N., Woodard, L., Williamson, P. (2013). Decision strategies and the confidence-accuracy relationship in face recognition. Journal Behavioral Decision Making, 26(2), 152.163. doi: <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/bdm.1750" target="_blank">10.1002/bdm.1750</a> Wissman, K., Rawson, K., & Pyc, M. (2012). How and when do students use flashcards? Memory, 20(6), 568-579. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2012.687052">10.1080/09658211.2012.687052</a> Witkin, H. A., Dyk, R. B., Faterson, H. F., Goodenough, D. R., & Karp, S. A. (1962). Psychological differentiation. John Wiley & Sons Inc. doi: <a href="https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/13128-000" target="_blank">10.1037/13128-000</a> Witkin, H., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1-64. doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.3102%2F00346543047001001">10.3102/00346543047001001</a> Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). Embedded Figures Test, Children’s Embedded Figures Test Manual. Consulting Psychologists Press. https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?title=A%20manual%20for%20the%20embedded%20figures%20test&author=H.%20A..%20Witkin&author=P.%20K..%20Oltman&author=E..%20Raskin&author=S.%20A..%20Karp&publication_year=1971 Yates, J. (1990). Judgment and decision making. Prentice-Hall. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1989-98745-000 Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review, 17(1), 1–53. doi: 10.1007/s10648-005-1635-4 Zhang, L. F, Sternberg, R. (2006). The nature of intellectual styles. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-03602-000 Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. (2009). Preface. In L. F. Zhang & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Perspectives on the nature of intellectual styles (pp. xi–xvi). Springer. https://www.springerpub.com/perspectives-on-the-nature-of-intellectual-styles-9780826104601.html <span style="font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language: ES-MX; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;" lang="ES-MX">Zohar, A., & Ben-David, A. (2009). <span style="font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">Paving a clear path in a thick forest: A conceptual analysis of a metacognitive component. Metacognition & Learning, 4(3), 177–195. doi:<span style="font-size: 8.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "AdvTT3713a231",serif; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; color: #111111; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"> <span style="font-size: 12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; line-height: 107%; font-family: "Times New Roman",serif; mso-fareast-font-family: Calibri; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-bidi-theme-font: minor-bidi; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">10.1007/s11409-009-9044-6<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="false" DefSemiHidden="false" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99" LatentStyleCount="376"> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" QFormat="true" Name="Normal" /> <w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Na

Downloads

PDF (Español (España))

Published

2022-01-20

Versions

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 2 (2022): Vol 39 No 2: Mayo - Agosto 2022

Section

Artículos

License

The Editor and/or publisher submitting the current journal information, or article, hereby confirms: 1) the author’s participation in the work; 2) the author’s approval to be referred to as the author; and 3) the author’s acceptance to all the conditions included in the Copyright Assignment provision herein included. The author (hereinafter referred to as Assignor) hereby irrevocably transfers and assigns, at no cost, to the Revista Psicología del Caribe of the Psychology School at Universidad del Norte - ISSN: 2011-7485 - (hereinafter referred to as Assignee) all rights, titles and interests, including all copyrights in Colombia and throughout the World, related to the submitted article.

The Assignor acknowledges that he/she is the owner/creator and the article is original. The Assignor declares that the article had not, is not, or will not be submitted elsewhere for print or electronic publication. In such an event, the Editor of the Revista Psicología del Caribe should be notified, in writing, and his/her response is required prior to evaluating the submitted article. The Assignor swears there is no impediment that prevents this Copyright Assignment. The Assignor consents that he/she may be held accountable for any copyright violations, plagiarism, or any other claim that may surge.

In consideration of this provision, the Assignee is authorized to copy, reprint, distribute, publish, and commercialize the submitted article through electronic, digital, of paper means. However, the Assignee is obligated to comply with the moral rights of the author, as established in the Act 23 of 1982, art. 30.

All articles published in Psicología desde el Caribe and its contents are under Creative Commons license CC BY. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0

An Exploratory Study of the Relation between Cognitive Style and Metacognitive Monitoring in a Sample of Colombian University Students

Authors

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

Versions

Issue

Section

License

Current Issue

Information

Language