The Public Sphere in Hegel’s Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Tensions and Mediations in Modern Ethical Life [Spanish]
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this paper, we explain two dimensions of public sphere where the tensions of modern ethical life are clearly perceived, according to Hegel’s Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. First, we present the public side of the states assembly, which has the function of mediating and overcoming the tensions characteristic of the private sphere by means of the political representation of particular interests of civil society. Second, we analyze Hegel’s ambivalent position regarding public opinion. According to Hegel, a people knows its true interests only through political representation. The publicity of the parliamentary debates is a necessary condition for the constitution of a people. This original perspective of political representation anticipates current political theories and clearly differentiates itself from classic understandings of representation.
Article Details
Section
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
References
Assalone, E. (2014). Mediación ética y organicismo político. Los tres silogismos de la eticidad y la articulación orgánica del Estado en Hegel. En H. Ferreiro; Th, S. Hoffmann; A. Bavaresco. (Comps. / Orgs.), Los aportes del itinerario intelectual de Kant a Hegel. Comunicaciones del I Congreso Germano-Latinoamericano sobre la Filosofía de Hegel - Os aportes do itinerário intelectual de Kant a Hegel. Comunicações do I Congresso Germano-Latinoamericano sobre a Filosofía de Hegel (pp. 123-138). Porto Alegre, Brasil: Editora FI; EDIPUCRS.
Assalone, E. (2017). El trabajo como principio estructural de la sociedad civil en la Filosofía del Derecho de Hegel. En E. Assalone (Comp.), El concepto moderno de trabajo. Actas de las VI Jornadas Nacionales de Filosofía Moderna (pp. 16- 28). Mar del Plata: Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Argentina. Recuperado de:
http://www.aadiebaires.com.ar/pdf/Actas%20VI%20JN%20Filosofia%20Modern a.pdf
Balsemão Pires, E. (1999). «O povo não sabe o que quer». Alguns aspectos da crítica hegeliana a J. J. Rousseau, a respeito da ideia de legitimidade e da origem do Estado, entre 1817/18 e 1820. Revista Filosófica de Coimbra, 15, pp. 65-115. Recuperado de:
https://www.uc.pt/fluc/dfci/publicacoes/o_povo_nao_sabe_o_que_quer
Bavaresco, A. (2001). A teoria hegeliana da opinião pública. Porto Alegre, Brasil: L&PM.
Brod, H. (1987). The "Spirit" of Hegelian Politics: Public Opinion and Legislative Debate from Hegel to Habermas. En P. Stillman (Ed.), Hegel's Philosophy of Spirit (pp. 124-144). Albany, NY, USA: State University of New York Press.
Buchwalter, A. (1992). Hegel's Concept of Virtue. Political Theory, 20 (4), pp. 548-583. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591792020004002
Carritt, E. F. (1935). Morals and Politics. Theories of their relation from Hobbes and Spinoza to Marx and Bosanquet. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press, reimpresión de 1963.
Cohen, J. L. y Arato, A. (1994). Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge (Ma), USA /London, UK: The MIT Press.
De Zan, J. (1993). Libertad, Poder y Discurso. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Almagesto.
De Zan, J. (2009). La filosofía social y política de Hegel. Trabajo y propiedad en la filosofía práctica. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Del Signo.
Deranty, J.-Ph. (2001). Hegel's Parliamentarianism: A New Perspective on Hegel's Theory of Political Institutions. The Owl of Minerva, 32 (2), pp. 107-133. Recuperado de: https://www.pdcnet.org//pdc/bvdb.nsf/purchase?openform&fp=owl&id=owl_200 1_0032_0002_0107_0134&onlyautologin=true
Duso, G. (2000). La libertà politica nella Rechtsphilosophie hegeliana: una traccia. En G. Duso y G. Rametta (Eds.), La libertà nella filosofia classica tedesca. Politica e filosofia tra Kant, Fichte, Schelling e Hegel (pp. 171-185). Milano, Italia: Franco Angeli.
Habermas, J. (1990). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M., Alemania: Suhrkamp.
Hardimon, M. O. (1994). Hegel's Social Philosophy. The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W . F. (1817/18). Vorlesungen über Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft Heidelberg 1817/18 mit Nachträgen aus der Vorlesung 1818/19 Nachgeschrieben von P. Wannenmann. Hamburg, Alemania: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1983.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1819/20). Philosophie des Rechts. Die Vorlesung von 1819/20 in einer Nachschrift. Frankfurt a.M., Alemania: Suhrkamp, 1983.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1821). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts oder Naturrecht und Staatswissenschaft im Grundrisse. Frankfurt a.M., Alemania: Suhrkamp, 1970, 2. Aufl., 1989. En el cuerpo del artículo se indica entre corchetes el número de página de la siguiente edición en español utilizada para las citas textuales.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2004). Principios de la Filosofía del Derecho. Trad. Juan Luis Vermal, Buenos Aires, Argentina: Sudamericana, 2da. Edición.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1830). Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse - 1830, Dritter Teil. Die Philosophie des Geistes. Mit den mündlichen Zusätzen. Frankfurt a.M., Alemania: Suhrkamp, 2. Aufl., 1989.
Horstmann, R.-P. (1974). Über die Rolle der bürgerliche Gesellschaft in Hegels politischer Philosophie. Hegel-Studien, 9, pp. 209-240. Recuperado de: https://meiner.de/reading/web/?isbn=9783787314737
Konzen, P. R. (2007). O conceito de Estado e o de liberdade de imprensa na Filosofia do Direito de G. W. F. Hegel. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil. Recuperado de: http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/12095
Laclau, E. (2005). La razón populista. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Lukács, G. (1938). Der junge Hegel und die Probleme der kapitalistischen Gesellschaft. Berlin, Alemania: Aufbau, 1954.
Marini, G. (1990). Tra Kant e Hegel: Per una riaffermazione dell'antico concetto di società civile. Teoria, X (1), pp. 17-28.
Popper, K. R. (1947). The Open Society and Its Enemies, Vol. II, The High Tide of Prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the Aftermath. London, UK: George Routledge & Sons, Ltd.
Riedel, M. (1970). Bürgerliche Gesellschaft und Staat. Grundprobleme und Struktur der Hegelschen Rechtsphilosophie. Berlin, Alemania: Hermann Luchterhand.
Riedel, M. (1975). Hegels Begriff der „bürgerlichen Gesellschaft" und das Problem seines geschichtlichen Ursprung. En M. Riedel (Hrsg.), Materialien zu Hegels Rechtsphilosophie, Band 2, Frankfurt a.M., Alemania: Suhrkamp.
Ritter, J. (1969). Hegel und die französische Revolution. En J. Ritter, Metaphysik und Politik. Frankfurt a.M., Alemania: Suhrkamp.
Rosenzweig, F. (1920). Hegel und der Staat, Zweiter Band, Weltepochen (1806-1831). München/Berlin, Alemania: R. Oldenbourg.
Saward, M. (2010). The representative claim. New York, USA / Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Terrier, J. (2001). Pouvoir Législatif, opinion publique et participation politique dans la Philosophie du Droit de Hegel. Revue Française d'Histoire des Idées Politiques, 13, pp. 57-72. Doi 10.3917/rfhip.013.0057.