The Accidental Being and its Several Causes in Aristotle’s Metaphysics E [Spanish]

Authors

  • Gabriela Rossi Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

Abstract

Aristotle’s Metaphysics E 2 and 3 are devoted to the discussion about accidental being and its causes, with the aim of assessing its credentials as a possible object of first philosophy. The result of this discussion is, in this sense, negative. However, first philosophy has something to say about accidental being, if only through a second order speech. The nature of the accidental is thus explored in these pages of Metaphysics, with the ultimate aim of confirming the impossibility of a scientific study (and a scientific discourse) about this way of being and its causes. The central part of this paper deals with E 2, 1026b27-1027a15, where Aristotle introduces the causes of accidental being. I endeavor to show that each of the three causes presented in these lines are compatible and relevant, as they can be understood, respectively, as the formal, efficient and material cause of what happens by accident.

Author Biography

Gabriela Rossi, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

Profesora e Investigadora de Jornada completa en el Departamento de Filosofía de la Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez desde 2015. Previamente me he desempeñado como Invesitgadora Adjunta de CONICET (Argentina) y Profesora en la Universidad de Buenos Aires.

 

References

<p>Calvo, T. (1994). Aristóteles, Metafísica, introducción, traducción y notas. Madrid: Gredos.</p><p><br />Diels, H. (ed.). (1882). Simplicii in Aristotelis Physicorum libros quattuor priores commen¬ta-ria, CAG. Vol. IX, Berlin: Reimer.</p><p><br />Jaeger, W. (ed.). (1957). Aristotelis, Metaphysica. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</p><p><br />Ross, W. D. (1924).Aristotle´s Metaphysics, a Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</p><p><br />Ross, W. D. (1936). Aristotle's Physics, a revised text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.</p><p><br />Schenkl, H. (ed.). (1900). Themistii in Aristotelis Physica Paraphrasis, CAG. Vol. V 1-3. Berlin: Reimer.</p><p><br />Sharples, R. (1983). Alexander of Aphrodisias. On Fate. Text, translation and commentary. London: Duckworth.</p><p><br />Vitelli, H. (ed.). (1887). Ioannis Philoponi in Aristotelis Physicorum libros tres priores commentaria, CAG. Vol. XVI. Berlin: Reimer.</p><p>Literatura secundaria <br />Cooper, J. (1987). Hypothetical necessity and natural teleology. En J. Lennox &amp; A. Gotthelf (Coords.), Philosophical Issues in Aristotle's Biology (pp. 243-274). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</p><p><br />Demoss, D. &amp; Devereux, D. (1988). Essence, Existence, and Nominal Definition in Aristotle's Posterior Analytics II 8-10. Phronesis 33 (2), pp. 136-152. Doi: 10.1163/156852888X00126</p><p><br />Deslauriers, M. (2007). Aristotle on Definition. Leiden: Brill.</p><p><br />Donini, P. L. (1989). Ethos. Aristotele e il determinismo. Alessandria: Edizioni dell'Orso.</p><p><br />Judson, L. (1991). Chance and ‘Always for the most part' in Aristotle. En L. Judson (Coord.), Aristotle's Physics. A collection of Essays (pp. 73-99). Oxford: Oxford University Press.</p><p><br />Judson, L. (1998). What can happen when you eat pungent food. En N. Avgelis &amp; F. Peonidis (Coords.), Aristotle on Logic, Language and Science (pp. 185-204). Thessaloniki: Sakkoulas Publications.</p><p><br />Kelsey, S. (2004). The Argument of ‘Metaphysics' vi 3. Ancient Philosophy, 24, 119-34. Doi: 10.5840/ancientphil20042417</p><p><br />Kirwan, Ch. (1993). Aristotle's Metaphysics. Books ?, ?, ?. Oxford: Clarendon Press.</p><p><br />Marmodoro, A. (2013). Causation without Glue: Aristotle on Causal Powers. En C. Viano, C. Natali &amp; M. Zingano (Coords.), Aitia I. Les quatre causes d'Aristote: origines et interprétations (pp. 221-246). Leuven: Peeters.</p><p><br />Masi, F. M. (2013). The Cause of the Accidental Being. En C. Viano, C. Natali &amp; M. Zingano (Coords.), Aitia I. Les quatre causes d'Aristote: origines et interprétations (pp. 161-190). Leuven: Peeters.</p><p><br />Menn, S. (2016). The Aim and the Argument of Aristotle's Metaphysics. (En prensa). Recuperado de https://www.philosophie.hu-berlin.de/de/lehrbereiche/antike/mitarbeiter/menn/contents</p><p><br />Mignucci, M. (1981). H?s epì tò polù et necessaire dans la conception aristotélicienne de la science. En E. Berti (Coord.), Aristotle on Science. The "Posterior Analytics" (pp. 173-203). Padova: Editrice Antenore.</p><p><br />Rossi, G. (2011). El azar según Aristóteles. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.</p><p><br />Rossi, G. (2013). Chance and accidental causes in Aristotle: Metaph. E 3 in the light of the concept of tyche. En F. Masi &amp; S. Maso (Coords.), Fate, Chance, Fortune in Ancient Thought (pp. 41-62). Amsterdam: Hakkert.</p><p><br />Sorabji, R. (1980). Necessity, Cause and Blame. Perspectives on Aristotle's Theory. London: Duckworth.</p>

Published

2017-11-20

Issue

Section

Articles