Patrones de interacción profesor-estudiante en colegios colombianos de alto y bajo desempeño en ciencias
Keywords:
Interacciones en Clase, Profesores, Estudiantes, Secundaria, Ciencia,Abstract
El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar los patrones de interacción profesor estudiante en colegios colombianos de alto y bajo rendimiento en el área de ciencias. Para esto se observaron las interacciones de 12 profesores y 118 estudiantes en clases de física, química y biología de secundaria. Se utilizó la pauta de observación Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS-Upper Elementary) para describir las interacciones en los dominios de apoyo pedagógico, apoyo emocional y organización de la clase durante tres sesiones de clase de una misma unidad temática. Las puntuaciones en estos dominios fueron comparadas entre los colegios de alto y bajo desempeño en pruebas estandarizadas en ciencias. En general no se encontraron diferencias significativas en los patrones de interacción entre profesor y estudiantes pertenecientes a colegios de alto desempeño y bajo desempeño en ciencias. Sin embargo, dentro del dominio de apoyo pedagógico se encontraron diferencias en relación con las dimensiones de comprensión del contenido y dialogo instruccional; en estas dimensiones, los patrones de interacción de los profesores-estudiantes pertenecientes a colegios con alto desempeño en ciencias mostraron mejores desempeños que los de bajo desempeño. Se discuten las implicaciones educativas de los hallazgos y se realizan sugerencias para trabajos observacionales similares.
References
Referencias
Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034-1037. doi:10.1126/science.1207998
Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., Lun, J., Hamre, B. & Pianta, R. (2013). Observations of Effective Teacher–Student Interactions in Secondary School Classrooms: Predicting Student Achievement with the Classroom Assessment Scoring System—Secondary, School Psychology Review, 42(1), 76-98.
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss. New York: Basic Books
Brigham, F., Scruggs, T., & Mastropieri, M. (2011). Science education and students with disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 26(4), 223-232. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00343.x
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1990). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. En M. R. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), The Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (pp. 43–77). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cheung, A., Slavin, R. E., Kim, E., & Lake, C. (2017). Effective secondary science programs: A best-evidence synthesis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(1), 58–81. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21338
Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. En M. Wittrock (Ed) Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.
Duke, D. (Ed.). (1979). Classroom management: The 78th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Gazmuri, C., Manzi, J., & Paredes, R. (2015). Disciplina, clima y desempeño escolar en chile. Revista CEPAL, 115, 115-128.
González-Weil, C., Cortez, M., Pérez, J. L., Bravo, P. & Ibaceta, Y. (2013). Construyendo dominios de encuentro para problematizar acerca de las prácticas pedagógicas de profesores secundarios de Ciencias: Incorporando el modelo de Investigación-Acción como plan de formación continua. Estudios Pedagógicos, 39(2), 129-146. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-07052013000200009
Gregory, A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. &., Hafen, C. A. & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Effects of a Professional Development Program on Behavioral Engagement of Students in Middle and High School. Psychology in the Schools, 51(2), 143-163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21741
Gregory, A. et al. (2017). My Teaching Partner-Secondary: A video-based coaching model. Theory Into Practice 56(1), 38–45. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1260402
Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Gregory, A., Hamre, B. & Pianta, R. C. (2012). The Pivotal Role of Adolescent Autonomy in Secondary School Classrooms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 245-255. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9739-2
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76(5), 949–967. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00889.x
Hamre, B. K., Pianta, R. C., Downer, J. T., Hakigami, A., Mashburn, A. J., Jones, S., Brown, J., Cappella, E., Atkins, M. S., Rivers, S. E., & Brackett, M. A. (2013). Teaching through Interactions: Testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 561–587.
Hesser, T., & Gregory, J. (2016). Instructional support sessions in chemistry: alternative remediation. Journal of Developmental Education, 39(3), 22-28.
Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
ICFES (2018). Resultados Nacionales. Saber 3, 5 y 9 2012-2017. Recuperado de http://www.icfes.gov.co/documents/20143/1323329/Informe%20nacional%20saber%20569%202012%202017.pdf
Janík, T., Seidel, T., & Najvar, P. (2007). Introduction: On the Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching and Learning. En T. Janík & T. Seidel (Eds.) The Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching and Learning in the Classroom (pp. 7-19). Berlin: Waxmann.
Kunh, D. (2006). Adolescent Thinking. En: R. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds) Handbook of Adolescent Development (153-186). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Issues and Trends, 94(5), 810-824. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395
Kuhn, D., & Pease, K., & Wirkala, C. (2008). Beyond control variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? Cognitive Development, 23(4), 435-451. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2008.09.006
Lavoie, D.R. (1999). Effects of emphasizing hypothetic-predictive reasoning within the science learning cycle on high school students’ process skills and conceptual understandings in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1127-1147.
Lee, J., & Stankov, L. (2018). Non-cognitive influences on academic achievement. En M. Khine & Areepattamannil (Eds), Non-Cognitive Skills and Factors in Educational Attatinment (pp.153-169). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6300-591-3-8
Leyva, D. (Marzo, 2014). Mejora de la calidad de las prácticas en niveles de transición de establecimientos Municipales en Santiago de Chile. Reportes de Educación. Fundación Educacional Oportunidad. Recuperado de http://www.fundacionoportunidad.cl/assets/uploads/archivos/72c57-2-mejora-de-la-calidad-de-las-practicas-en-niveles-de-transicion-de-establecimientos-municipales-en-santiago-de-chile.pdf
Leyva, D., Yoshikawa, H., Snow, C., Barata, C, Treviño, E., Rolla, A. (2015).Teacher-child interactions in Chile and their associations with prekindergarten outcomes, Child Development, 86(3), 781-99. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12342.
Ma, X., Ma, L., & Bradley, K. D. (2008). Using multilevel modeling to investigate school effects. In A. A. O’Connell y D. B. McCoach (Eds.), Multilevel Analysis of Educational data (pp. 59-110). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
MEN (2017). Informe Nacional de Resultados. Colombia en PISA 2015. Recuperado de http://www.icfes.gov.co/documents/20143/237304/Informe%20nacional%20pisa-2015.pdf
Nachar, N. (2008). The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(1), 13-20. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.04.1.p013
Pakarinen et al. (2010). Classroom organization and teacher stress predict learning motivation in kindergarten children. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 25(3), 281-300. doi: 10.1007/s10212-010-0025-6
Pianta, R., & Allen, J. (2008). Building capacity for positive youth development in secondary school classrooms: Changing teachers’ interactions with students. En M. Shinn & H. Yoshikawa (Eds.), Toward positive youth development: Transforming schools and community programs (pp. 21–35). Londres: Oxford University Press.
Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Allen, J. (2012). Teacher-Student Relationships and Engagement: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Improving the Capacity of Classroom Interactions. En S. Christenson et al. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 365-386). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17
Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Mintz, S. (2012). Classroom Assessment Scoring System-Upper Elementary Manual. Charlottesville, VA: Teachstone.
Reeve, J., Vansteenkiste, M., Assor, A., Ahmad, I., Cheon, S., Jang, H…. & Wang, C. (2014). The beliefs that underlie autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching: A multinational investigation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 93-110. doi: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11031-013-9367-0
Reyes, M., Brackett, M., Rivers, S., White, M. & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700-712. doi: 10.1037/a0027268
Roth, K. J. (2009). Using video studies to compare and understand science teaching: Results from the TIMSS Video Study of 8th grade science teaching. En T. Janík & T. Seidel (Eds.), The power of video studies in investigating teaching and learning in the classroom (pp.23-37). Berlin: Waxmann.
Rutdlege, S., Cohen-Vogel, L., & Osborne-Lampkin, L. (2012). Identifying the characteristics of effective high schools. Report from year one of the national center scaling up effective school. Recuperado de https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED538011.pdf
Ruzek, E., Hafen, C., Allen, J., Gregory, A., Mikami, A., & Pianta, R. (2016). How teacher emotional support motivates students: The mediating roles of perceived peer relatedness, autonomy support, and competence. Learning and Instruction, 42, 95-103. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.004
Scruggs, T., Brigham, F., & Mastropieri, M. (2011). Common core science standars: implication for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilites Research & Practice, 28(1), 49-57. doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12002.
Thibaut, L., Knipparth, H., Dehane, W., & Deapaepe, F. (2018). The influence of teachers´s attitudes and school context on instructional practices in integrated STEM education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 190-205. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.014
Treviño, E., Toledo, G., & Gempp, R. (2013). Calidad de la educación parvularia: las prácticas de clase y el camino a la mejora. Pensamiento Educativo, Revista de Investigación Educacional Latinoamericana, 50(1), 40-62. doi:10.7764/ PEL.50.1.2013.
Virtanen, T., Pakarinen, E., Lerkkanen, M., Poikkeus, A., Siekkinen, M., Nurmi, J. (2017). A Validation Study of Classroom Assessment Scoring System Secondary in the Finnish School Context. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(6), 849-880. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431617699944
Wentzel, K., Rusell, S., & Baker, S. (2016). Emotional support and expectations from partners, teachers, and peers predict adolescent competence at school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(2), 242-255. doi: 10.1037/edu0000049
Wilson, C., & Morgan, B. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43-50. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043
Yoshikawa H, Leyva D, Snow CE, Treviño E, Barata MC, C W, Gomez CJ, Moreno L, Rolla A, D’Sa N, et al. (2015). Experimental impacts of a teacher professional development program in Chile on preschool classroom quality and child outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 51(3), 309-22. doi: 10.1037/a0038785
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-03-30 (3)
- 2022-01-19 (2)
- 2020-06-03 (1)
Issue
Section
License
The Editor and/or publisher submitting the current journal information, or article, hereby confirms: 1) the author’s participation in the work; 2) the author’s approval to be referred to as the author; and 3) the author’s acceptance to all the conditions included in the Copyright Assignment provision herein included. The author (hereinafter referred to as Assignor) hereby irrevocably transfers and assigns, at no cost, to the Revista Psicología del Caribe of the Psychology School at Universidad del Norte - ISSN: 2011-7485 - (hereinafter referred to as Assignee) all rights, titles and interests, including all copyrights in Colombia and throughout the World, related to the submitted article.
The Assignor acknowledges that he/she is the owner/creator and the article is original. The Assignor declares that the article had not, is not, or will not be submitted elsewhere for print or electronic publication. In such an event, the Editor of the Revista Psicología del Caribe should be notified, in writing, and his/her response is required prior to evaluating the submitted article. The Assignor swears there is no impediment that prevents this Copyright Assignment. The Assignor consents that he/she may be held accountable for any copyright violations, plagiarism, or any other claim that may surge.
In consideration of this provision, the Assignee is authorized to copy, reprint, distribute, publish, and commercialize the submitted article through electronic, digital, of paper means. However, the Assignee is obligated to comply with the moral rights of the author, as established in the Act 23 of 1982, art. 30.
All articles published in Psicología desde el Caribe and its contents are under Creative Commons license CC BY. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0
