Eros, Philia and Community in Plato and Aristotle [Spanish]
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Both in Plato and Aristotle, eros is questioned as a form of relationship with the other that brings us to a virtuous life and enable us to think about life in community. In Plato’s view, such a questioning would be in favor of a search for the Beauty that would offer a particular model of philia —that of philo-sofia—. In Aristotle’s view, the questioning of eros by individuals would be in favor of a model of philia —the virtuous philia— virtually restricted to an ideal level —because it is rare to find virtuous men—. In both cases, however, the way philia is being thought would, in a sense, provide an ideal model of community.
Article Details
Section
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
References
Bolotin, D. (1977). Plato's Dialogue on Friendship: An Interpretation of the Lysis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Brink, D. (1999). Eudaimonism, Love and Friendship, and Political Community. Social philosophy & Policy foundation, 16(1), 252-289. Doi: 10.1017/S0265052500002326
Foucault, M. (2006). Historia de la sexualidad II. El uso de los placeres. Madrid: Siglo XXI.
Guariglia, O. (1997). La ética en Aristóteles o la moral de la virtud. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.
Lledó Íñigo, E. (1985). Lisis. En Platón, Diálogos I, (pp. 273-316). Madrid: Gredos.
Martínez Hernández, M. (1988). Banquete. En Platón, Diálogos III (pp. 143-287). Madrid: Gredos.
Moravcsik, J. (1972). Reason and Eros in the "Ascent"- Passage in the Symposium. En J. Anton, y G. Kustas, (Eds.). Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy (pp. 285-302). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Nichols, M. (2006). Friendship and Community in Plato's "Lysis". The Review of Politics, 68(1), 1-19. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670506000027
Nussbaum, M. (1995). El discurso de Alcibíades: una interpretación del Banquete. En La fragilidad del bien (pp. 229-268). Madrid: La balsa de Medusa.
Obdrzalek, S. (2010). Moral Transformation and the Love of Beauty in Plato's Symposium. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 48(4), 415-44. Doi: 10.1353/hph.2010.0013
Pallí Bonet, J. (1998). (Trad.). Ética nicomáquea. En Aristóteles, Ética nicomáquea. Ética eudemia (pp. 131-408). Madrid: Gredos.
Price, A. (1999). Friendship and Politics. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie, 525-545. Recuperado de: http://www.tijdschriftvoorfilosofie.eu/inhoud/jg1999.html
Riegel, N. (2014). Goodness and Beauty in Plato. Archai, (12), 147-158. Doi: 10.14195/1984--249X_12_15
Salim, E. (2006). Embracing the Half: Aristotle's Revision of Platonic Eros and philia. Indonesia: Universitas Tarumanagara.
Sheffield, F. (2001): Alcibiades' Speech: A Satyric Drama. Greece & Rome, 48(2), 193-209. Recuperado de
https://www.jstor.org/stable/826920?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Sherman, N. (1987). Aristotle on Friendship and the Shared Life. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 47(4), 589-613. Recuperado de https://www.jstor.org/stable/2107230?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Smith, T. (1999). Aristotle on the Conditions for and Limits of the Common Good. The American Political Science Review, 93(3), 625-636. Doi: 10.2307/2585578
Vlastos, G. (1981). Platonic studies. Princeton: University Press.
Whiting, J. (1991). Impersonal Friends. Monist, 74(1), 3-29. Recuperado de: https://www.jstor.org/stable/27903221