About the Formal Distinctions of Spinozistic Substance. Deleuze and Dialectics [Spanish]
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper addresses the Deleuzian interpretation of the Spinozist substance. It aims at showing that the fundamental nucleus of this interpretation lies in pointing out the unique and simultaneously multiple character of the substance, which Deleuze conceptualizes through the category of formal distinction, taken from Duns Scoto. To reach this goal, the notions of univocity and expression are characterized. This leads us to affirm that substance, being both unique and multiple, consists of the development of a contradiction. This character allows us to conclude that the Deleuzian interpretation, beyond its manifest purpose, emphasizes a dimension of Spinoza’s work that brings it closer to Hegel’s philosophy. This implies that Deleuze’s own production also offers aspects that approach it to the German philosopher’s work.
Article Details
Section
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
References
Althusser, L. (2004). La revolución teórica de Marx. 26a ed. México: Siglo XXI Editores.
Aristóteles (2004). Metafísica. 4a ed. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.
Badiou, A. (1999). The Clamor of Being. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Baugh, V. (2009). G. W. F. Hegel. En G. Jones & J. Roffe (Eds.), Deleuze's philosophical lineage (pp. 130-146). Edinburgo: Edinburgh University Press.
Castilla Cerezo, A. (2011). Deleuze, lector de Spinoza. Del problema de la expresión
a la filosofía práctica. Convivium, (24), 163-179. Recuperado de:
https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Convivium/article/viewFile/248272/332385
Cesarale, G. (2005). Philosophy and Forms of Objectivity: Althusser vis-à-vis Hegel, Parallax, 21(4), 375-395. Doi: 10.1080/13534645.2015.1086527
Chaui, M. (2008). O fim da metafísica: Espinosa e a ontologia do necessário. En D. Tatián (Comp.), Spinoza: cuarto coloquio (pp. 11-38). Córdoba: Brujas.
Deleuze, G. (1999). Spinoza y el problema de la expresión. 2° ed. Barcelona: Muchnik Editores.
Deleuze, G. (2003). En medio de Spinoza. 2° ed. Buenos Aires: Cactus.
Deleuze, G. (2006). Nietzsche y la filosofía. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Deleuze, G. (2012). Diferencia y Repetición. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.
Diefenbach, K. (2013) Althusser with Deleuze: how to think Spinoza's immanent cause. En K. Diefenbach, S. Farris, & G. Kirn (Eds.) Encountering Althusser: Politics and Materialism in Contemporary Radical Thought (pp-165-184). London: A&C Black.
Duffy, S. (2006). The Logic of Expression: Quality, Quantity, and Intensity in Spinoza, Hegel and Deleuze. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
Gainza, M. (2011). Espinosa: Uma Filosofia Materialista do Infinito Positivo. San Pablo: Editora da Universidade de São Paulo.
Groves, Ch. (1999). Hegel and Deleuze: Immanence and Otherness (Tesis de doctorado), University of Warwick, Coventry, Inglaterra.
Gueroult, M (1968). Spinoza I - Dieu (Éthique I). Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.
Hegel, G. W. (1982). Ciencia de la Lógica. 5° ed. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Solar.
Hegel, G. W. (1989). Diferencia entre el sistema de filosofía de Fichte y el de Schelling, Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Hegel, G.W. (2006). Fenomenología del Espíritu. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Holland, E. (1998). Spinoza and Marx. Cultural Logic, 2(1). Recuperado de: http://works.bepress.com/eugene_w_holland/2/
Jones, G., & Roffe, J.(2009). Introduction: Into the Labyrinth. En G. Jones & J. Roffe (Eds.), Deleuze's philosophical lineage (pp. 1-7). Edinburgo: Edinburgh University Press.
Lord, B. (2011). Kant and Spinozism: Transcendental Idealism and Immanence from Jacobi to Deleuze. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lucchesi Ramacciotti, B. (2013). Ética de Espinosa. Paidéia filosófica e terapêutica de corpo e mente. En D. Tatián (Comp.), Spinoza: noveno coloquio (pp-351-360). Córdoba: Brujas.
Lumsden, S. (2014). Self-consciousness and the Critique of the Subject: Hegel, Heidegger, and the Poststructuralists. Nueva York: Columbia University Press.
Macherey, P. (1997). The Problem of the Attributes. En W. Montag & T. Stolze (Eds.), The new Spinoza. (pp. 65-95). Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Macherey, P. (2006). Hegel o Spinoza. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.
Malabou, C. (1996). Who's Afraid of Hegelian Wolves? En P. Patton (Ed.), Deleuze, a critical reader (pp. 114-138). Massachusetts: Blackwelll Publishers.
Marx, K. (2001). Manuscritos Económico Filosóficos. Edición preparada por Juan R. Fajardo para el MIA. [Consultado el 7 de Marzo de 2018] Disponible en: https://www.marxists.org/espanol/m-e/1840s/manuscritos/
Nancy, J-L. (2002) Hegel. The Restlessness of the Negative. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Nail, T. (2008). Expression, Immanence and Constructivism: 'Spinozism' and Gilles Deleuze. Deleuze Studies 2(2), 201-219. Recuperado de: https://www.euppublishing.com/doi/10.3366/E1750224108000287
Negri, A. (1991). The Savage Anomaly: The Power of Spinoza's Metaphysics and Politics. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Peña García, V. (1974). El materialismo de Spinoza. Madrid: Revista de Occidente.
Piercey, R. (1996). The Spinoza-intoxicated Man: Deleuze on expression. Man and World, 29(3), 269-281. Recuperado de:
http://www.faculty.umb.edu/gary_zabel/Courses/Spinoza/Texts/The%20Spinoza-intoxicated%20man.pdf
Sauvagnargues, A. (2013). Hegel and Deleuze: Difference or Contradiction? En J. Vernon & K. Houle (Eds.) Hegel and Deleuze: Together Again for the First Time (pp. 38-53). Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Smith, D. (2012). Essays on Deleuze. Edinburgo: Edinburgh University Press.
Spinoza, B. (2005). Ética. Buenos Aires: Caronte.
van Reijen, M. (2008). El tema de Medea en la Ética de Spinoza. En D. Tatián (Comp.), Spinoza: cuarto coloquio (pp. 369-378). Córdoba: Brujas.
Widder, N. (2012). Political Theory after Deleuze. Londres: Continuum.
Widder, N. (2009). John Duns Scoto. En G. Jones & J. Roffe (Eds.), Deleuze's Philosophical Lineage (pp. 27-43). Edinburgo: Edinburgh University Press.