The Liberal Ethics of Charles Taylor in the Political Context of Liberal Societies [Spanish]
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article presents a critical reflection on the liberal ethical proposal of Charles Taylor and its viability in the political context of current liberal societies. A liberal social and political configuration is understood as one in which greater liberties are promoted and defended in individual rights schemes together with the requirement of respect for those individual guarantees. However, the liberal political context although the most suitable in current societies, presents several ethical problems that Taylor has already identified as the malaise of modernity: excess of individualism, primacy of instrumental reason and fragmentation and polarization of the society. Faced with these challenges and conflicts arising from the liberalism itself, Taylor’s ethics is a possible alternative to understand and manage them from an ethical civility and the promotion of common goals.
Article Details
Section
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
References
Abbey, R. (2000). Charles Taylor. Teddington, UK: Acumen.
Gracía Calandín, J. (2011). Ética y política en Charles Taylor: Claves para una sociedad intercultural. Madrid, Espala: Editorial Académica Española.
Beytía, P. (2016). Charles Taylor - Imaginarios sociales modernos (reseña). Persona y Sociedad, 25(3), 159-162. doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4688.3602
Dasc?lu, D. I. (2014). Individualism and morality in the post-communist capitalism. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 149(2014), 280-285. doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.08.230
Deneen, P. J. (2018). Why liberalism failed. Estados Unidos: Yale University Press.
De Vriese, H. (2010). The charm of disechantment: A quest for the intellectual attraction of secularization theory. Sophia, 49(3), 407-428. doi.org/10.1007/s11841-010-0167-7
Galston, W. A. (2018). The populist challenge to liberal democracy. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 5-19. doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0020
Gómez Velásquez, A. (2017). El costo democrático de la democracia representativa. Revista Republicana, 22(2017), 159-181. doi.org/10.21017/Rev.Repub.2017.v22.a24
Grant, J. (2014). On the critique of political imaginaries. European Journal of Political Theory, 13(4), 408-426. doi.org/10.1177/1474885113519259
Habermas, J. (1989). El discurso filosófico de la modernidad. Madrid, España: Taurus.
Kaul, V. (2018). Populism and the crisis of liberalism. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 44(4), 346-352. doi.org/10.1177/0191453718774951
Miller, D. (2008). Immigrants, nations, and citizenship. Journal of political philosophy, 16(4), 371-390. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2007.00295.x
Miller, D. (2015). Selecting Immigrants. Social Justice Politics. Centre for the Study of Social Justice. Department of Politics and International Relations. University of Oxford. Recuperado de http://www.politics.ox.ac.uk/materials/publications/SJ034.pdf
Montero, D. (2015). A Taylorian approach to social imaginaries: The origins of Chile's democratic culture. (Tesis doctoral). Digitale Bibliothek Thüringen. Recuperado de https://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/MCRFileNodeServlet/dbt_derivate_00031905/Thesis%20Dario%20Montero%20PDF-A.pdf
Sepúlveda del Río, I. (2015). La crisis de la libertad: reaprender a ser libres. Revista de Fomento Social, 277(1/2015), 29-47. Recuperado de http://0-search.proquest.com.millenium.itesm.mx/docview/1781805553?accountid=11643
Stauffer, D. J. (2014). Tocqueville on the modern moral situation: Democracy and the decline of devotion. The American Political Science Review, 108(4), 772-782. doi.org/10.1017/S0003055414000458
Strunz, S., & Bartkowski, B. (2018). Degrowth, the project of modernity, and liberal democracy.
Journal of Cleaner Production, 196(2018), 1158-1168. doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.148
Taylor, Ch. (1990). Lo justo y el bien. Revista de Ciencia Política, 12(1-2), 65-88. Recuperado de https://repositorio.uc.cl/bitstream/handle/11534/10821/000129070.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Taylor, Ch. (1994a) Can liberalism be communitarian? Critical Review, 8(2), 257-262. doi.org/10.1080/08913819408443337
Taylor, Ch. (1994b). La ética de la autenticidad. (P. C. Pérez, Trans.). Barcelona, España: Paidós.
Taylor, Ch. (1994c). Multiculturalism. A. Gutmann (Ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Taylor, Ch. (1997). Argumentos filosóficos: Ensayos sobre el conocimiento, el lenguaje y la modernidad. (F. B. Beltrán, Trans.). Barcelona, España: Paidós. (Trabajo original publicado en 1995)
Taylor, Ch. (2003). Ethics and Ontology. The Journal of Philosophy, 100(6), 305-320. doi.org/10.5840/jphil2003100611
Taylor, Ch. (2005). La libertad de los modernos (H. Pons, Trans.). Buenos Aires, Argentina: Amorrortu. (Trabajo original publicado en 1997)
Taylor, Ch. (2006). Imaginarios sociales modernos (R. V. Vernis, Trans.). Barcelona, España: Paidós. (Trabajo original publicado en 2004)
Taylor, Ch. (2007). A secular age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, Ch. (2014). Hegel y la sociedad moderna (J. J. Utrilla, Trans.). Distrito Federal, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. (Trabajo original publicado en 1979)
Taylor, Ch. (2015). Encanto y Desencantamiento: Secularidad y laicidad en occidente. (J. P. Escobar, Trans.). Cantabria, España: Sal Terrae. (Trabajo original publicado en 2013)
Taylor, Ch. (2016). The language animal: The full shape of the human linguistic capacity. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Tebble, A. (2017). Liberty against progress. Social Philosophy and Policy, 34(2), 237-258. doi.org/10.1017/S0265052517000280
Tomicevic-Dubljevic, J., & Vujcic, M. (2018). Urban forest benefits to the younger population: The case study of the city of Belgrade, Serbia. Forest Policy and Economics, 96(2018), 54-62. doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.08.006