Uso y abuso de la figura de contratación directa para prestación de servicios profesionales en Colombia. Análisis de casos 2018-2022.

Use and Abuse of Direct Contracting for the Provision of Professional Services in Colombia. Analysis of Cases 2018-2022

Authors

Keywords:

civil service, public employment, principle of meritocracy, decent work, primacy of reality over forms

Abstract

It has always been believed that under the premise of article 125 of the Colombian Constitution, the principle of merit is the one that should prevail when granting public benefits in Colombia. However, public entities use and abuse the famous figure of literal h, numeral 4, article 2 of Law 1150. This investigation will have as its purpose the contract for the provision of professional services, which deals with an obligation to do. The autonomy and independence of the contractor from the technical and scientific point of view constitutes the essential element of this contract; The validity of the contract is temporary and, therefore, its duration must be for a limited time and the essential time to execute the agreed contractual object. But this is not reality. The state resorts to this figure to link plant personnel or to grant the benefits of a contract of these in order to “pay favours”.

Author Biography

Carlos Davila, Universidad Central (Bogotá)

Doctor in Administrative Law. Master in Public Law. Master in Comparative Law. Lawyer. DSU in Administrative Law. Professor and coordinator of the Public Law Seminar at Universidad Central (Bogotá).

References

Apaza, D. (2014). El Contrato Administrativo de Prestación de Servicios (CAPS) visto desde los escenarios jurisprudenciales de la Corte Constitucional. Una interpretación Ficta de la Administración Pública. Criterios, 7(1), 81-143. https://doi.org/10.21500/20115733.1873

Benavides, J. L. (2010). Contrato de prestación de servicios. Difícil delimitación frente al contrato realidad.

Revista Derecho del Estado, 7(25), 85-116. https://doi.org/10.2/JQUERY.MIN.JS

Castrillón Arango, D. (2021). Reflexiones acerca del contrato de prestación de servicios en la Administración pública colombiana y de su indebida utilización: ¿un problema sin solución? Revista Digital de Derecho Administrativo, 27, 225-258. https://doi.org/10.18601/21452946.N27.08

Corte Constitucional. (2001). T-1303, Sintraelecol y Otros c. Electrificadora de la Costa Atlántica. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2001/T-1303-01.htm

Corte Constitucional. (2004). C-038, Demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra los artículos 1, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 51 parciales de la ley 789. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/

/C-038-04.htm

Corte Constitucional. (2005). C-401, Demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra el artículo 19 (parcial) del CST. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/2005/C-401 05.htm#_ftnref23

Corte Constitucional. (2009). T-733. https://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/

/t-733-09.htm

Published

2025-04-20

Issue

Section

Research Articles