The Aporia of Sovereign Suicide: The Principle of Self-Destruction as a Limiting Notion in Spinoza’s Ethics [Spanish]
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Suicide or spinozian interfictium is at first sight a marginal category in Spinoza’s thought. The vast philosophical production on who has been considered the philosopher of the “savage anomaly” or at the same time the “cheerful affects” thinker, ignores or, in the best-case scenario, obliquely addresses the notions of death and suicide. The paradox is complete because the rejection towards the thought of death contrasts with the profuse questioning of the aforesaid category in its Ethics. The goal of this article is to show that the negative expression of suicide, as pure impossibility and servitude with respect to external causes is however, less literal and clear when some central elements of its most emblematic work are incorporated in its analysis. Liberty, Need, and Substance, among others, are concepts that from suicide get tensioned showing the own limits of the geometric order insinuated by Spinoza.
Article Details
Section
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
References
Améry, J. (2005). Levantar la mano sobre uno mismo: Discurso sobre la muerte voluntaria. Barcelona: Ed. Pre-textos.
Artaud, A. (1972). Van Gogh. El suicidado por la sociedad. Buenos Aires: Ed. Argonauta.
Arendt, H. (1980). Los orígenes del Totalitarismo. Madrid: Alianza.
Badiou, A. (2011). Whats is a proof in Spinoza's Ethics? En "Spinoza Now", Dimitris Vardoulakis editor, University of Minnesota Press, London, pp.39-51.
Balibar, E. (2011). Spinoza y la Política. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.
Bataille, G. (1996). Lo que entiendo por Soberanía. Buenos Aires: Paidos.
Biset, E. (2012). Tanatopolítica En Revista Nombres. Córdoba, año XXI, nº 26, pp.245- 274.
Camus, A. (2015). Carnets (1935-1951). Madrid: Alianza.
Chun Han, B. (2014). Psicopolítica: Neoliberalismo y Nuevas técnicas de poder. Madrid: Herder.
Cohen, D. (2003). El suicidio: deseo imposible o la paradoja de la muerte voluntaria en Baruj Spinoza. Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Signo.
Cohen, D. (2001). La muerte según Baruch Spinoza: la muerte como noción problemática Dianoia Año XLVI, Núm. 46. Pp. 41-64.
Cohen, D. (2007) Por mano propia, estudio sobre las prácticas suicidas. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura económica.
Deleuze, G. (2013). Spinoza: filosofía práctica. Buenos Aires: Tusquets.
Deleuze, G. (2014). Curso sobre Rosseau. Buenos Aires: Cactus.
Deleuze, G. (2015). En Medio de Spinoza. Buenos. Aires: Cactus.
Lordon, F. (2015). Capitalismo, deseo y servidumbre, Marx y Spinoza. Buenos Aires: Tinta
Limón.
Kaminsky, G. (1998). Spinoza: la política de las pasiones. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Lukács, G. (2007). Marx, ontología del ser social. Madrid: Akal.
Colerus Jean, et al. (2017). Vidas de Spinoza. Santiago: UDP.
Macherey, P. (2014). Hegel o Spinoza. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.
Margot, J. (2011). Libertad y Necesidad en Spinoza en Praxis Filosófica, Nº32 enero-junio
2011. P. 27-44.
Nancy, J. (2006). La representación prohibida. Madrid: Amorrortu.
Marx, K. (2012) Acerca del Suicidio. Madrid: Las cuarenta.
Montag, Warreng. En Spinoza contemporáneo / coord. por Montserrat Galcerán Huguet, 2009.
Morfino, V. (2009). El tiempo de la multitud. Santiago: Doble ciencia.
Negri, A. (2015). La Anomalía Salvaje, poder y potencia en Baruch Spinoza . Buenos Aires: Waldhunter.
Negri, A. (2009). Spinoza Subersivo. Madrid: Akal.
Spinoza, B. (2010). Tratado Político. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Spinoza, B. Ética. (2014). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Wallace, M. (1977). Death and destruction in Spinoza's ethics Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 20-1-4, pp. 403-417.