Freedom, Justice and Recognition [Spanish]
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article shows that the theory of justice and liberty developed by Axel Honneth in Freedom´s Right, has a wider range and depth than those theories of justice and democracy developed in contemporary liberalism by Rawls and Habermas. Nevertheless, its normative model of recognition has a serious limitation, which consists in circumscribing the reach of its conception of freedom to the most developed western societies. This limitation affects the proposal in a negative way; it produces an important loss of its critical potential and determines that its normative and reconstructive approach of freedom’s history may be insufficient in front of other critical visions of society. First, the author does a presentation of the tension between the negative and positive dimensions of freedom. Then, he reconstructs the way in which Honneth exposes the historical process of the fight for freedom and thus structures a definition of this fight, which includes three dimensions of freedom: juridical, moral and social. Finally, the author develops some critical considerations dealing with Honneth’s recognition model, as it does not acknowledge other historical experiences of the fight for freedom
Article Details
Section
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
References
Aron, R. (1969). Ensayo sobre las libertades. Madrid: Alianza.
Biral, A. (1998). Hobbes: la sociedad sin gobierno. En: G. Duso (Ed.), El Contrato social en la filosofía política moderna (pp. 51-107). Valencia: Res Publica.
Berlin, I. (1993). Cuatro ensayos sobre la libertad. Madrid: Alianza.
Constant, B. (1970). Principios de política. Madrid: Aguilar.
Constant, B. (1988). Del espíritu de conquista. Madrid: Tecnos.
Constant, B. (2008). Del espíritu de conquista y de usurpación. Madrid: Tecnos.
Duso, G. (2004). Génesis y Lógica de la representación política moderna. Fundamentos: Cuadernos monográficos de teoría del estado, derecho público e histo¬ria constitucional, 3, 1-73. Recuperado de
https://www.unioviedo.es/constitucional/fundamentos/tercero/index.html
Giusti, M. (2015). Disfraces y extravíos. Sobre el descuido del alma. Perú: FCE.
Habermas, J. (2012). Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Honneth, A. (1992). Kampf um Anerkennung. Zur moralischen Grammatik sozialer Konflikte. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Honneth, A. (2001). Leiden an Unbestimmheit. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Honneth, A. (2014). El derecho de la libertad. Esbozo de una eticidad democrática. Buenos Aires: Katz.
Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviatán o la materia, forma y poder de una república eclesiástica y civil. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Heinz, V. (2014). Axel Honneths Kritikstil in Das Recht der Freiheit. En: J. Romero, Immanente Kritik heute (pp. 143- 156). Deutschland: Transcript.
Kant, I. (1997). La Metafísica de las Costumbres. Madrid: Tecnos.
Kersting, W. (1994). Die politische Philosophie des Gesellschaftsvertrags. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Locke, J. (1991). Dos ensayos sobre el gobierno civil. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarquía, Estado y Utopía. México: FCE.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Oxford: University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rousseau, J. (1979). Discurso sobre el origen de la desigualdad entre los hombres. México D.F.: Porrúa.
Rousseau, J. (1969). El contrato social. Madrid: Aguilar.
Schaub, Jörg. (2015). Misdevelopments, Pathologies, and Normative Revolutions: Normative Reconstruction as Method of Critical Theory. Critical Horizons, 16 (2), 107-130. Doi: 10.1179/1440991715Z.00000000043