The Syntactic Approach as a Framework for Ontic Structural Realism [Spanish]
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Ontic Structural Realism (OSR) states that a realistic reading of scientific theories (especially of modern physics) requires to take structures as ontologically fundamental. Regardless of how this commitment is articulated, OSR proponents agree that the appropriate framework for developing such a position is the semantic approach to theories. I argue that, at least in aspects relevant to the formulation of OSR, the semantic approach is not superior to the syntactic one. I also show that the Received View has the necessary conceptual resources to adequately express the metaphysical commitments of OSR.
Article Details
Section
1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term "Work" shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher a nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons 3.0 License Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported CC BY-NC 3.0, or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions: (a) Attribution: Other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;(b) Noncommercial: Other users (including Publisher) may not use this Work for commercial purposes;
4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
5. Authors are permitted, and Eidos promotes, to post online the preprint manuscript of the Work in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work is expected be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Eidos's assigned URL to the Article and its final published version in Eidos.
References
Bell, J. L., y Slomson, A. B. (1974). Models and ultraproducts: An introduction. 3rd ed. Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland.
Borge, B. (2013). ¿Qué es el realismo estructural óntico?: Una aproximación al debate actual sobre el realismo científico. Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia, 13(27), 149-175. doi: 10.1590/0100-6045.2017.v40n2.bb
Borge, B. (2015). Realismo científico hoy: a 40 años de la formulación del Argumento del No-Milagro. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, 37(2), 221-233. doi: 10.4025/actascihumansoc.v37i2.26933
Borge, B. (2017). ¿Soluciona el descriptivismo causal el problema de la referencia de los términos teóricos? Ideas y Valores, 66(163), 125-151. doi: 10.15446/ideasyvalores.v66n163.49743
Carnap, R. (1936). Testability and meaning. Philosophy of science, 3(4), 419-471. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/184400
Carnap, R. (1939). Foundations of Logic and Mathematics. I: 139-213. Foundations of the Unity of Science. Toward an International Encyclopedia of Unified Science 3. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Chang, C. C., y Keisler, H. J. (1990). Model theory. Volume 73 of Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: North Holland. 3rd impression 1992.
Chakravartty, A. (2001). The semantic or model-theoretic view of theories and scientific realism. Synthese, 127(3), 325-345. doi: 10.1023/A:1010359521312
Chakravartty, A. (2007). A metaphysics for scientific realism: Knowing the unobservable. Cambridge University Press.
Chakravartty, A. (2009). Informational versus Function Theories of Scientific Representation. Synthese 72(2), 197-213. doi: 10.1007/s11229-009-9502-3
Cruse, P. y Papineau, D. (2002). Scientific Realism Without Reference. En Marsonet, M. (ed.), The Problem of Realism (pp.174-189). London, Ashgate.
da Costa, N., y French, S. (1990). The model-theoretic approach in the philosophy of science. Philosophy of Science, 57(2), 248-265. doi: 10.1086/289546
da Costa, N., y French, S. (2003) Science and Partial Truth. New York: Oxford University
Press.
French, S. (1989). Identity and individuality in classical and quantum physics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 67(4), 432-446. doi: 10.1080/00048408912343951
French, S. (2014). The structure of the world: Metaphysics and representation. Oxford University Press.
French, S. y Krause, D. (2006). Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
French, S. y Ladyman, J. (1999). Reinflating the semantic approach. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 13(2), 103-121. doi: 10.1080/02698599908573612
Frigg, R. (2006). Scientific representation and the semantic view of theories. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 21(1), 49-65. doi: 10.1387/theoria.553
Giere, R. (1988). Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hintikka, J. (1998), Ramsey Sentences and the Meaning of Quantifiers. Philosophy of Science, 65(2), 289-305. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9313-7_13
Hodges, W. (1993). Model theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis, D. (1970). How to define theoretical terms. The Journal of Philosophy, 67(13), 427-446. doi: 10.2307/2023861
Lutz, S. (2012). On a straw man in the philosophy of science: A defense of the Received View. HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 2(1), 77-120. doi: 10.1086/664460
Lutz, S. (2014). What's right with a syntactic approach to theories and models? Erkenntnis, 79(8), 1475-1492. doi: 10.1007/s10670-013-9578-5
Lutz, S. (2015). Partial Model Theory as Model Theory. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy, 2(22). doi: 10.3998/ergo.12405314.0002.022
Merrill, G. H. (1980). The model-theoretic argument against realism. Philosophy of Science, 47(1), 69-81. doi: 10.1086/288910
Newman, M.H.A. (1928). Mr. Russell's causal theory of perception. Mind, 37(146), 137-148. doi: 10.1093/mind/XXXVII.146.137
Prze?ecki, M. (1969). The Logic of Empirical Theories. Monographs in Modern Logic Series. London and New York: Routledge y Kegan Paul/Humanities Press.
Psillos, S. (1999). Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, London: Routledge.
Psillos, S. (2012). Causal descriptivism and the reference of theoretical terms. En Raftopoulos, A. & Machamer, P. (eds.), Perception, realism, and the problem of reference (pp. 212-238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ramsey, F. (1931). Truth and probability. En Braithwaite, R. (ed.), The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays (pp. 156-198). London: Humanities Press.
Reichenbach, H. (1965). The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Suárez, M. (2003). Scientific Representation: Against Similarity and Isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 17(3), 225-244. doi: 10.1080/0269859032000169442
Suppe, F. (1971). On partial interpretation. The Journal of Philosophy, 68(3), 57-76. doi: 10.2307/2025168
Suppe, F. (1974). The search for philosophic understanding of scientific theories. En Suppe, F. (ed.), The structure of scientific theories (pp. 3-241). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Suppes, P. 1967. What is a Scientific Theory? En Morgenbesser, S., (ed.), Philosophy of Science Today (pp. 55-67). New York: Basic Books.
Suppes, P. (2002). Representation and Invariance of Scientific Structures. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Tegmark, M. (2008). The mathematical universe. Foundations of Physics, 38(2), 101-150. doi: 10.1007/s10701-007-9186-9
Teller, P. (2001), Twilight of the Perfect Model. Erkenntnis, 55(3), 393-415. doi: 10.1023/A:1013349314515
van Fraassen, B. (1970). On the Extension of Beth's Semantics of Physical Theories. Philosophy of Science, 37(3), 325-339. doi: 10.1086/288311
van Fraassen, B. (1972). A Formal Approach to the Philosophy of Science. En Colodny, R. (ed.), Paradigms and Paradoxes (pp. 303-366). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
van Fraassen, Bas C. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. The Clarendon Library of Logic
and Philosophy. Clarendon Press.
van Fraassen, B. C. (2006a). Representation: The problem for structuralism. Philosophy of Science, 73(5), 536-547. doi: 10.1086/518323
van Fraassen, B. C. (2006b). Structure: Its shadow and substance. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 57(2), 275-307. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axl002
van Fraassen, B. C. (2006c). Replies to the papers. En Berg-Hildebrand, A. & Suhm, C. (eds.), Bas van Fraassen: The Fortunes of Empiricism. Münstersche Vorlesungen zur Philosophie (pp. 125-171). Germany: De Gruyter.
Worrall, J. (1989). Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds? Dialectica, 43(1-2), 99-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1989.tb00933.x