Analysis of CSR and the impact of the supply chain on sustainable performance practices: a case study of a mexican exporting company
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14482/INDES.29.1.658.408Keywords:
World Economic Forum, corporate social responsibility, international logisticsAbstract
The case study presented, seeks to understand the corporate social responsibility (CSR), analyzing its value chain from the Model of the 31 practices of the supply chain that the World Economic Forum (2015). It is a qualitative research, with a descriptive case study approach. The objective of the work is to observe the impact of international logistics operations in a Mexican exporting SME and to analyze whether its economic significance has had a sustainable social, economic and environmental development. The results indicate a competitive advantage in product differentiation based on Porter and Kramer's (2002) concept of shared value. According to the WEF Model, the archetype is: Liberal humanist, since it emphasizes business value by 65% and weights socio-environmental aspects by 35%. However, impacts on the supply chain must be mitigated if the organization is to be identified as a socially responsible company.
References
Abreu, J.L. y Badii, M. (2006). Análisis del concepto de responsabilidad social empresarial. Daena: International Journal of Good Conscience, 2(1), 54-70. http://dx.doi.org/10.6035/2174-0992.2013.5.14.
Alicke, K., Rexhausen, D. y Seyfert, A. (2020). Supply Chain en bienes de consumo. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/supply-chain-4-0-in-consumer-goods/es-es#
Arana-Solares, I.A., Alfalla-Luque, R. y Machuca, J.A.D. (2012). Análisis de las variables que proporcionan una competitividad sostenible de la cadena de suministro. Intangible Capital, 8(1), 92-122.
Arango, M. D., Valencia, J. A. y Ruíz, S. (2020). Sistema de logística inversa para el desarrollo sostenible de un astillero. Revista UIS ingenierías, 19(2), 105-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.18273/revuin.v19n2-2020012
BanKi-Mon (2015). Organización de las Naciones Unidas [ONU] (2015). Informe El camino hacia la dignidad para 2030: acabar con la pobreza y transformar vidas protegiendo el planeta Informe de síntesis del Secretario General sobre la agenda de desarrollo sostenible después de 2015. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/files/2015/01/SynthesisReportSPA.pdf
Baumgartner, R.J. y Ebner, D. (2010). Corporate sustainability strategies: Sustainability profiles and maturity levels. Sustainable Development, 18(2), 76-89.
Cuevas, G., Ortega, K. y Martínez, O. (2018). Logística Sustentable en las empresas de la ciudad de Durango. Revista Ciencia Administrativa, 8(1), 116-130. https://www.uv.mx/iiesca/files/2019/01/Vol8-2018-Especial.pdf
Dorado, A.C. (2019). Percepciones de los gerentes frente a la aplicación de modelos de responsabilidad social empresarial. Económicas CUC, 40(2), 42-52.
Engelage, E., Borgert, A. y De Souza, M. A. (2016). Prácticas logísticas ecológicas: un enfoque teórico del tema. Rev. Gest. Ambient. Sustentabilidade, GeAS, 5(3),36-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.5585/geas.v5i3.446
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Harper Collins.
Friedman, M. (1970), The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times Magazine, 32-3
Hernández-Sampieri, R. y Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. McGraw Hill Education.
Homburg, C., Stierl, M. y Bornemann, T. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility in Business-to-Business Markets: How Organizational Customers Account for Supplier Corporate Social Responsibility Engagement. Journal of Marketing, 77(6), 54-72.
Lozano, R. Gómez-Dantés, H., Castro, M., Franco-Marina, F. y Santos-Preciado, J.I. (2011). Avances en los Objetivos de Desarrollo del Milenio 4 y 5 en Mesoamérica. Salud Pública de México, 53, 295-302.
Mendes, P. (2015). The Case for Corporate Security Responsibility. www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv6zdb49.6
McKinnon, A. (2011). Global logistics challenges: a view from the World Economic Forum. Logistics & Transport Focus, 13(10), 16–17.
Mishra, S. y Modi, S. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Wealth: The Role of Marketing Capability. Journal of Marketing, 80(1), 26-46. www.jstor.org/stable/43785257
Nava, J. y Abreu, Y. (2015). Logística Verde y Economía Circular. International Journal of Good Conscience, 10(3), 80-91. http://www.spentamexico.org/v10-n3/A7.10(3)80-91.pdf ?
Organización de las Naciones Unidas [ONU] (2019). Asamblea Cumbre del Milenio de las Naciones Unidas. https://www.un.org/spanish/milenio/
Porter, M. y Krammer, M. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthrophy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 56-69.
Portugal, M., Constantino, M. y Costa, R. (2018). Logística inversa como alternativa de eficiencia empresarial y sutentabilidad ambiental, en Municipio de Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Multitemas, 23(55), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.20435/multi.v23i55.1756
Schwab, K. (2019). La Gran Reconstrucción: Un nuevo marco para la cooperación global. https://es.weforum.org/agenda/2019/01/la-gran-reconstruccion/
Tarín D., García D., Hernández J. y Zamarripa N. (2008). Cadena de suministro. https://www.gestiopolis.com/cadena-suministro/.
Vibes, A. (2014). Gui?as para la Responsabilidad Social en las PyMEs: Efectividad de herramientas de autoevaluacio?n. GCG: Revista de Globalizacio?n, Competitividad & Gobernabilidad, 8, 29-54.
World Economic Forum. [WEF]. (2015). Beyond Supply Chains Empowering Responsible Value Chains. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_BeyondSupplyChains_Report201 5.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Research & Development provides free access to its content to those who register on the website under the principle that making research freely available to the public supports greater global knowledge sharing.
It runs under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
Neither the submission nor the processing of the articles implies costs for the authors or the institutions of which they are part.
