Participation of women in leadership positions in business administration, economics and accounting programs: Barriers and strategies in HIES in Bogotá.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14482/indes.34.01.785.415Keywords:
Gender gaps, gender equity, gender, academic leadershipAbstract
Objectives: The participation of women in leadership positions in higher education institutions has been the subject of several research studies globally. Although these studies have explored the barriers and challenges faced by women, as well as the strategies and policies needed to promote greater gender equity in these roles, there are still gaps and lacunae in the current knowledge that require further research. Consequently, this article examines the barriers and challenges faced by women in accessing management positions in business administration, economics and accounting programs in higher education institutions in Bogotá, Colombia, as well as the perspectives and strategies needed to achieve greater gender equity in these positions. Cultural, social and, organizational factors that influence this disparity will be analyzed, and measures and policies will be proposed to address this problem and promote greater female participation in academic leadership levels.
Materials and methods: This study used a quantitative approach with a descriptive correlational scope to analyze the perceptions and experiences of teachers and administrators in business administration programs in higher education institutions in Bogotá. The target population consisted of members of higher education institutions in Bogotá, including teachers, administrative staff, program directors, deans, research group leaders, planning, quality, and accreditation managers, area heads, and researchers belonging to business administration, economics, and accounting programs. A non-probabilistic convenience sampling was used due to the limitations of access to the entire population. Invitations to participate in the survey were sent through emails and social networks, requesting the collaboration of members of different higher education institutions in Bogotá. A structured questionnaire was used to collect data on awareness of capabilities, opportunities for participation in leadership positions, and perceived barriers. To ensure the validity of the measurement instrument used in this study, a validation process was carried out by expert judges. In total, five judges participated in this stage, all of them with PhDs and extensive experience in academia and gender studies; in this process, an individual review of each item, evaluation and feedback, concordance analysis, and the review and adjustment of items to be linked in the instrument were carried out. A cluster analysis was applied to identify different groups of perception among the participants, and statistical tests were performed to evaluate the hypotheses raised on the relationship between the characterization of leadership positions, the strategies implemented, and women's participation.
Results: The study sample was composed of (n=536) 58% women, 40% men, and 2% who identify with another gender. Regarding age, 22% of the participants were between 18 and 30 years old, 38% between 31 and 40 years old, 28% between 41 and 50 years old, and 12% were older than 50 years old. Concerning their position, 45% are teachers, 20% are administrative staff, 15% are program directors, 10% are deans, and 10% hold other leadership positions. In terms of educational level, 15% have a university degree, 45% a specialization, 30% a master's degree, and 10% a doctorate. The cluster analysis identified four main groups of perception among the participants. Cluster 1 (25%) showed high perceptions of capabilities and opportunities; Cluster 2 (30%) recognized high capabilities but perceived low opportunities; Cluster 3 (20%) considered low capabilities but high opportunities; and Cluster 4 (25%) showed low perceptions of both capabilities and opportunities. Statistical evidence confirmed that a more inclusive and equitable characterization of leadership positions and the implementation of specific strategies are positively related to greater participation of women in leadership roles. The existence of explicit gender policies was also associated with better perceptions and greater female participation. The data as a whole indicate that the overall perception of participants in leadership positions shows considerable variability, suggesting significant differences in experiences and perceptions according to position and faculty. Moreover, the representation and participation of women in leadership positions is perceived as insufficient by a significant majority, highlighting the need for more effective policies and cultural change within institutions. Similarly, current strategies to promote gender equality are seen as inadequate by the majority of participants, suggesting the need to review and strengthen these initiatives. Finally, there is a general perception that professional development opportunities and support for growth are insufficient, underscoring the need for mentoring programs and resources dedicated to fostering the professional development of women in leadership positions.
Conclusions: The results of the study highlight the need for greater attention to perceptions of capabilities and opportunities among women in business administration programs. It is crucial to implement effective gender policies and specific strategies to remove barriers to women's participation in leadership positions. Higher education institutions in Bogotá must adopt more inclusive and proactive approaches to promote gender equity at the academic leadership levels. These actions will not only improve female representation in leadership positions, but will also contribute to the comprehensive development and educational quality of these institutions. Furthermore, the results revealed a significant positive correlation between the perception of barriers and the need to implement measures to encourage the active participation of women in leadership positions. This suggests that those who recognize the existence of challenges tend to be more convinced of the need to take concrete actions to address this situation. Similarly, a moderate positive correlation was found between the perception that highly developed skills are required for leadership positions and the importance attributed to these training programs. This suggests that those who recognize the complexity of leadership roles tend to place grater value on the need for specific development programs for women, which is consistent with the recommendations of the literature on empowerment and the development of female leadership skills.
References
Abadi, M., Dirani, K. M., & Rezaei, F. D. (2022). Women in leadership: a systematic literature review of Middle Eastern women managers' careers from NHRD and institutional theory perspectives. Human Resource Development International, 25(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2020.1840847
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441-464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
Acker, S., & Armenti, C. (2004). Sleepless in academia. Gender and Education, 16(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954025032000170309
Ahmed, S. (2012). On Being Included: Racism and Diversity in Institutional Life. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822395324
Airini, Collings, S., Conner, L., McPherson, K., Midson, B., & Wilson, C. (2011). Learning to be leaders in higher education: What helps or hinders women’s advancement as leaders in universities. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 39(1), 44-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210383896
Asgari, A., Mezginejad, S. y Taherpour, F. (2020). El papel de los estilos de liderazgo en el comportamiento ciudadano organizacional a través de la mediación del apoyo organizacional percibido y la satisfacción laboral. Innovar, 30 (75), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v30n75.83259
Bagilhole, B., & White, K. (Eds.). (2013). Generation and gender in academia. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137269171_1
Bilimoria, D., & Liang, X. (2012). Gender equity in science and engineering: Advancing change in higher education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203149133
Bishu, S. G., & Headley, A. M. (2020). Equal employment opportunity: Women bureaucrats in male‐dominated professions. Public Administration Review, 80(6), 1063-1074. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13178
Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management. Sage Publications. http://diglib.globalcollege.edu.et:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/1311/28391.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2021). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of neuroscience research, 99(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24631
Chacón, O. M. (2023, 17 de agosto). Mujeres y educación superior: avances y brechas de género en el acceso a la universidad. El Tiempo. https://www.eltiempo.com/vida/educacion/mujeres-y-educacion-superior-avances-y-brechas-de-genero-en-el-acceso-a-la-universidad-797347
Clavero, S., & Galligan, Y. (2021). Delivering gender justice in academia through gender equality plans? Normative and practical challenges. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(3), 1115-1132. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12658
Cohen, R. J., Swerdlik, M. E., & Sturman, E. D. (2009). Psychological Testing and Assessment: An Introduction to Tests and Measurement. McGraw-Hill. https://perpus.univpancasila.ac.id/repository/EBUPT181396.pdf
Dahlerup, D., & Freidenvall, L. (2005). Quotas as a 'Fast Track' to Equal Representation for Women: Why Scandinavia is No Longer the Model. International Feminist. Journal of Politics, 7(1), 26-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461674042000324673
De Welde, K., & Stepnick, A. (Eds.). (2023). Disrupting the culture of silence: Confronting gender inequality and making change in higher education. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003444299
Dumulescu, D., & Muţiu, A. I. (2021). Academic leadership in the time of COVID-19 —Experiences and perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 648344. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648344
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1037/e664062007-001
Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of Gender in Organizations: A New Approach to Organizational Analysis and Change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 103-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22004-2
Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women's leadership development programs. Academy of management learning & education, 10(3), 474-493. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0046
Guerrero, R. V. (2025, 17 de marzo). Más preparación, menos liderazgo: solo el 23,1% de las mujeres en juntas directivas. El Espectador. https://www.elespectador.com/genero-y-diversidad/las-igualadas/mas-preparacion-menos-liderazgo-solo-el-231-de-las-mujeres-en-juntas-directivas/
Giacomin, M., Tskhay, K. O., & Rule, N. O. (2022). Gender stereotypes explain different mental prototypes of male and female leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(6), 101578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101578
Glazer-Raymo, J. (1999). Shattering the myths: Women in academe. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/40252344
González, M. T. (2024). Desafíos y oportunidades de las mujeres en la educación superior: Análisis del discurso de Ana González de Méndez [Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Ana G. Méndez-Gurabo]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/c9e0bf138f3b50ac8a9d120cb11ed41e/1?cbl=18750&diss=y&pq-origsite=gscholar
Ibarra, H., Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010). Why Men Still Get More Promotions Than Women. Harvard Business Review, 88(9), 80-85. https://archive.bio.org/sites/default/files/docs/toolkit/Why%20Men%20Still%20Get%20More%20Promotions%20than%20Women_HBR%20article.pdf
Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100404
Keddie, A., & Holloway, J. (2020). School autonomy, school accountability and social justice: Stories from two Australian school principals. School Leadership & Management, 40(4), 288-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1643309
Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading Change. Harvard Business Review Press. https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/6e5efd05/files/uploaded/Leading%20Change.pdf
Krukowski, R. A., Jagsi, R., & Cardel, M. I. (2021). Academic productivity differences by gender and child age in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Women's Health, 30(3), 341-347. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8710
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://caepnet.org/~/media/Files/caep/knowledge-center/lawshe-content-validity.pdf
Lawson, M. A., Martin, A. E., Huda, I., & Matz, S. C. (2022). Hiring women into senior leadership positions is associated with a reduction in gender stereotypes in organizational language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(9), e2026443119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026443119
Leal Filho, W., Kovaleva, M., Tsani, S., Țîrcă, D. M., Shiel, C., Dinis, M. A. P., ... & Tripathi, S. (2023). Promoting gender equality across the sustainable development goals. Environment. Development and Sustainability, 25(12), 14177-14198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02656-1
Lendák-Kabók, K. (2022). Women’s work–life balance strategies in academia. Journal of Family Studies, 28(3), 1139-1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2020.1802324
Lipton, B. (2020). Measures of success: cruel optimism and the paradox of academic women's participation in Australian higher education. In Academic Life in the Measured University (pp. 34-45). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2017.1290053
Maseda, A., Iturralde, T., Cooper, S., & Aparicio, G. (2022). Mapping women's involvement in family firms: A review based on bibliographic coupling analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 279-305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12278
Morley, L. (2013). Women and Higher Education Leadership: Absences and Aspirations. Leadership Foundation for Higher Education. https://www.ses.unam.mx/curso2015/pdf/23oct-Morley.pdf
Morley, L., & Crossouard, B. (2015). Women in Higher Education Leadership in South Asia: Rejection, Refusal, Reluctance, Revisioning. British Council. https://sussex.figshare.com/articles/report/Women_in_higher_education_leadership_in_South_Asia_rejection_refusal_reluctance_revisioning/23414528?file=41134838
N., Moroz, I., & D’Angelo, M. S. (2020, November). Mental health services in Canada: barriers and cost-effective solutions to increase access. In Healthcare management forum (Vol. 33, nº. 6, pp. 282-287). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470420933911
O’Connor, P., & Irvine, G. (2020). Multi-level state interventions and gender equality in higher education institutions: The Irish case. Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040098
O'Connor, P. (2015). Good Jobs - But Places for Women? Gender and Education, 27(4), 338-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1021302
O'Connor, P. (2020). Why is it so difficult to reduce gender inequality in male-dominated higher educational organizations? A feminist institutional perspective. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 45(2), 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2020.1737903
Pardal, V., Alger, M., & Latu, I. (2020). Implicit and explicit gender stereotypes at the bargaining table: Male counterparts’ stereotypes predict women’s lower performance in dyadic face-to-face negotiations. Sex Roles, 83(5), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01112-1
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The Content Validity Index: Are You Sure You Know What's Being Reported? Critique and Recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Ruben, B. D., De Lisi, R., & Gigliotti, R. A. (2023). A guide for leaders in higher education: Concepts, competencies, and tools. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003442769
Spendlove, M. (2007). Competencies for effective leadership in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(5), 407-417. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710760183
Tabassum, N., & Nayak, B. S. (2021). Gender stereotypes and their impact on women’s career progressions from a managerial perspective. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 10(2), 192-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975220975513
Urrea-Solano, M., Merma-Molina, G., & Gavilan-Martin, D. (2025). El liderazgo femenino universitario: dificultades en el desempeño del cargo. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/153419
Van den Brink, M., & Benschop, Y. (2012). Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization, 19(4), 507-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508411414293
Vinnicombe, S., & Singh, V. (2003). Developing female global managers. Journal of Women in Management Review, 18(4), 165-174. https://doi.org/10.1108/09649420310478509
Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. (2004). Academic motherhood: Managing complex roles in research universities. The Review of Higher Education, 27(2), 233-257. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2003.0079
Wasburn, M. H. (2007). Mentoring women faculty: An instrumental case study of strategic collaboration. Mentoring & Tutoring, 15(1), 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260601037389
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pilar Pulido

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Research & Development provides free access to its content to those who register on the website under the principle that making research freely available to the public supports greater global knowledge sharing.
It runs under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC 4.0 License.
Neither the submission nor the processing of the articles implies costs for the authors or the institutions of which they are part.










