Normas para pares evaluadores

ARTICLE EVALUATION FORM

The Revista de Derecho is a biannual refereed publication, financed by the Universidad del Norte (Colombia). Its purpose is to disseminate works of scientific research in law. Its purpose is to publish and disseminate articles that contribute to national and international legal science. It is governed by the double blind peer review evaluation system.

We would like to express our appreciation to you for agreeing to evaluate the attached article for publication in the Revista de Derecho. Please send us your assessment of it, and your recommendation as to whether or not it is publishable. Your comments are considerably helpful for the ongoing optimization of the journal. Please note that it is the Editor's policy to send evaluation comments anonymously to the author of the article.

Due to the new evaluation processes of our National Indexing System-Publindex (Colombia), which evaluates all publications at the national level, we kindly ask you to provide some information required by the virtual platform when entering the information corresponding to each issue of the journal. While we know that some of this information is personal, we assure that this will not be made public and will be handled securely and anonymously.

Full Name:
Date of birth:
Cedula No. (if Colombian):
Passport No. (if not Colombian):
Level of education:
Institutional affiliation:
Year of Institutional Affiliation:
Lines of research:
Orcid ID:
Email:
Evaluation Date:

INSTRUCTIONS: The evaluation of the article must be done according to the criteria outlined. All fields must be filled in. We ask you to provide a reasoned concept in order to be able to transmit your opinion to the authors who collaborate with us. Please include any additional comments you consider pertinent.

EVALUATION CRITERIA

1. GENERAL EVALUATION

 

2. CLASSIFICATION OF THE PAPER

According to the suggested article typology, do you consider this paper to be (mark with an X):

 

3. RATING

According to your evaluation, do you consider the article to be:

In case you have selected the option “Not publishable”, please explain your reasons specifically:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

4. OTHER RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE AUTHOR(S)

______________________________________________________________________________________________________________