Carga cognitiva en la lectura de hipertexto

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF HTML
Publicado: jul 16, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.14482/zp.28.9505
Palabras clave:
Carga cognitiva hipertexto teoría de la carga cognitiva comprensión lectora

Contenido principal del artículo

Margarita Cardenas Pernett
Docente de aula del Distrito de Barranquilla
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5814-8508

Resumen

Este artículo tiene como finalidad realizar una revisión del concepto de carga cognitiva  y explicar los aportes relevantes de diferentes autores para determinar los efectos  de la lectura de hipertexto en  relación con  la carga cognitiva. Así mismo, presentar un repaso histórico que permite establecer los antecedentes de este concepto, sus tipos y los diferentes elementos que la conforman.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Número
Núm. 28 (2018)
Sección
Estado del arte o revisión bibliográfica
Los autores/as que deseen publicar en esta revista aceptan los siguientes términos:

  1. Los autores/as mantienen los derechos de autor y autorizan a la revista el derecho de publicar por primera vez el artículo y trabajar simultáneamente con licencia  bajo Creative Commons Attribution License que permiteque otros puedan compartir el trabajo, acreditandola a  los autores/as y la publicación inicial enZona Próxima.
  2. Los autores/as pueden entablar acuerdos contractuales adicionales y separados para la distribucón no exclusiva de la versión del trabajo publicada en la revista (colocarla en un repositorio institucional o publicarla en un libro), con un reconocimiento  de su publicación inicial en Zona Próxima.

  3. Se permite y se estimula a los autores/as que coloquen su trabajo en línea (por ejemplo, repositorios institucionales o en su website) antes y durante  el proceso de envío, ya que esto puede producir intercambios productivos así como una mayor y más temparana cita del trabajo publicado.
Biografía del autor/a

Margarita Cardenas Pernett, Docente de aula del Distrito de Barranquilla

Docente de Distrito de Barranquilla, Título: Magister en Educación,

Citas

Acuña, R. & López, G. (2015) La lectura digital: requerimientos cognitivos y ayudas para la comprensión. Disponible en http://reposital.cuaed.unam.mx:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/4214/1/VE14.336.pdf

Amadieu, F., Tricot, A., & Mariné, C. (2009). Prior knowledge in learning from a non—linear electronic document: Disorientation and coherence of the reading sequences. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 381—388. Disponible en: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.670.3861&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Anderson, R. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise: General discussion of the conference. In R. Anderson, R. Spiro & W. Montague (eds), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 415—431). Erlbaum, Hillsdale N.J.

Andrade, L. (2012) Teoría de la carga cognitiva, diseño multimedia y aprendizaje: un estado del arte Magis. Revista Internacional de Investigación en Educación, 5 . Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=281024896005

Antonenko, P., Paas, F., Grabner, R., & van Gog, T. (2010). Using electroencephalography to measure cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(4), 425—438. Disponible en http://crawl.prod.proquest.com.s3.amazonaws.com/fpcache/a9d0c23ced69982c49e10a292d149bd6.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJF7V7KNV2KKY2NUQ&Expires=1458601379&Signature=nVhFplHbc8jLh6vFIrgcwOc6B9Q%3D

Artino, A. (2008). Cognitive load theory and the role of learner experience: an abbreviated review for educational practitioners. Aace Journal, 16 (4), 425 – 439.

Atkinson, R. & Shiffrin, R. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. Spence (ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 2,(pp. 89—195). New York: Academic Press.

Ayres, P. & Van Gog, T. (2009). State of the art research into cognitive load theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 253—257. Disponible en http://dspace.ou.nl/bitstream/1820/1793/1/Ayres—vanGog_CiHB_2009.pdf

Baddeley, A. (1983). Working memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 302, (1110), 311—324.

Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of communication disorders, 36(3), 189—208. Disponible en https://faculty.biu.ac.il/~armonls/924/NWR/baddeley.pdf

Baddeley, A., & Logie, R. H. (1999). Working memory: The multiple—component model. In A. Miyake, & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of Working Memory (pp. 28—61). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bannert, M. (2002). Managing cognitive load: Recent trends in cognitive load theory. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 139—146.

Canepa, C.D. (2010) Actividad Laboral y Carga Mental de Trabajo. Ciencia y Trabajo, 12(36), 281–293. Disponible en http://www.fiso—web.org/Content/files/articulos—profesionales/2922.pdf

Cegarra, J., & Chevalier, A. (2008). The use of Tholos software for combining measures of mental workload: Toward theoretical and methodological improvements. Behavior Research Methods, 40(4), 988—1000. Disponible en http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BRM.40.4.988

Chen, I. J., & Chang, C. C. (2009). Teoría de carga cognitiva: Un estudio empírico sobre la ansiedad y el rendimiento en tareas de aprendizaje de idiomas. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(18), 729—746. Consultado el 6 de diciembre en: http://www.investigacion—psicopedagogica.org/revista/new/ContadorArticulo.php?348

Chen, C. & Rada, R. (1996). Modelling Situated Actions in Collaborative Hypertext Databases. Journal of Computer—Mediated Communication, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083—6101.1996.tb00189.x

Clark, R. C. & Mayer, R. E. (2007). E—Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

Clark, R., Kirschner, P. & Sweller, J. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. Spring: American Educator.

DeStefano, D., & LeFevre, J. A. (2005, 2007). Cognitive load in hypertext reading: A review. Computers in human behavior, 23(3), 1616—1641. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.08.012

Díaz, P., Catenazzi, N. & Aedi, I. (1996). De la Multimedia a la Hipermedia. Madrid: RA—MA Editores.

Dillon, A. & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322—349. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003322

Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K. & Cierniak, G. (2009). The scientific value of cognitive load theory: A research agenda based on the structuralist view of theories. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 43—54.

Gwizdka, J. (2010). Distribution of cognitive load in web search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(11), 2167—2187. Disponible en http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1005/1005.1340.pdf

Hancock, P.A. & Chignell, M.H. (1987).Adaptive Control in Human—Machine Systems. Advances in Psychology, 47, 305—345. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166—4115(08)62312—2

Harper, S., Michailidou, E. & Stevens, R. (2009). Toward a definition of visual complexity as an implicit measure of cognitive load. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 6(2). 1—18.

Hart, S. & Staveland, E. (1988). Development of NASA—TLX (Task Load Indez): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psy chology, 52, 139—183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166—4115(08)62386—9

Hasler, B. S., Kersten, B. & Sweller, J. (2007). Learner control, cognitive load and instructional animation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21,713—729.

Kirschner, P. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning & Instruction, 12, 1–10. Disponible en https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Kirschner/publication/222830815_Cognitive_load_theory_implications_of_cognitive_load_theory_on_the_design_of_learning/links/00b49526a0c7fe63ff000000.pdf

Lee, M. J., & Tedder, M. C. (2003). The effects of three different computer texts on readers’ recall: Based on working memory capacity. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 767–783.

Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior research methods, 45(4), 1058—1072. Disponible en http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1706&context=sspapers

Luchini, P. L., & Ferreiro, G. M. (2014). Interface entre Teoría de la Carga Cognitiva y habilidades de lectura comprensiva en L2: Un estudio experimental mixto. Didáctica. Lengua y Literatura, 26, 241—262. Disponible en http://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/DIDA/article/viewFile/46834/43946

Madrid, R. I., Van Oostendorp, H., & Melguizo, M. C. P. (2009). The effects of the number of links and navigation support on cognitive load and learning with hypertext: The mediating role of reading order. Computers in Human Behavior,25(1), 66—75. Disponible en : http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563208001258

Mayer, R. E. (2003). Elements of a science of e—learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 297— 313.

Mayer, R. E. (Ed.). (2005). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. Cambridge University Press. Disponible en http://paginapessoal.utfpr.edu.br/kalinke/gptem/grupos—de—pesquisa/grupos—de—pesquisa/pdf/2014/The%20animation.pdf

Miyake, A. & Shah, P. (Eds.) (1999). Models of Working Memory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Moray, N. (1979). Mental Workload: Its Theory and Measurement. New York: Plenum

Niederhauser, D., Reynolds, R., Salmen, D. & Skolmoski, P. (2000). The influence ofcognigtive load on learning from hypertext. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(3), 237—255. https://doi.org/10.2190/81BG—RPDJ—9FA0—Q7PA

Ozcinar, Z. (2009). The topic of instructional design in research journals: A citation analysis for the years 1980—2008. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 559—580. Disponible en: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.363.7260&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 1—4. Disponible en http://steinhardtapps.es.its.nyu.edu/create/courses/2174/reading/Paas_Renkl_Sweller_EP.pdf

Paas, F., Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: New conceptualizations, specifications, and integrated research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 115—121. Disponible en http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648—010—9133—8/fulltext.html

Pollock, E., Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 61—86.

Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y. & Nakano, L. (2007). Measuring visual clutter. JVis, 7(2), 1—22. doi: 10.1167/7.2.17.

Shaffer, D., Doube, W. & Tuovinen, J. (2003). Applying Cognitive Load Theory to Computer Science Education. Paper presented at the 15th Workshop of the Psychology of Programming Interest Group, Keele UK. Disponible en: http://www.ppig.org/papers/15th—shaffer.pdf

Shapiro, A., & Niederhauser, D. (2004). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 605–620). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schmeck, A., Opfermann, M., van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Leutner, D. (2015). Measuring cognitive load with subjective rating scales during problem solving: differences between immediate and delayed ratings. Instructional Science,43(1), 93—114. Disponible en http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11251—014—9328—3#page—1

Schmutz, P., Heinz, S., Métrailler, Y., & Opwis, K. (2009). Cognitive Load in eCommerce Applications—Measurement and Effects on User Satisfaction. Disponible en https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Klaus_Opwis/publication/220316624_Cognitive_Load_in_eCommerce_Applications_—_Measurement_and_Effects_on_User_Satisfaction/links/09e4150b4a30c65149000000.pdf

Schoor, C., Bannert, M., & Brünken, R. (2012). Role of dual task design when measuring cognitive load during multimedia learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 753—768. Consultado el 10 de marzo de 2016 en: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11423—012—9251—8/fulltext.html

Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and instruction, 4(4), 295—312. Disponible en http://www.instructionaldesign.institute/uploads/3/1/2/2/31221959/sweller_cognitive_load_theory_1994.pdf

Sweller, J. (2007). Keynote address: Cognitive load. Paper presented at the Symposium on Cognitive Load: Theory and Applications. Taiwan: Universidad Fo Guang, Yilan.

Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123—138.

Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. & Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251—296.

van Merrienboer, J., Kester, L. & Paas, F. (2006). Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: Balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(3), 343—352.

van Merrienboer, J., Kirschner, P. & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5—14.

van Merrienboer, J. & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review,17(2),147—177.

Zumbach, J., & Mohraz, M. (2008). Cognitive load in hypermedia reading comprehension: Influence of text type and linearity. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 875—887. Disponible en https://www.sbg.ac.at/mediaresearch/zumbach/download/2007_2008/journals/Zumbach_Mohraz_2008.pdf