The public budget and the protection of cultural heritage in Entre Ríos (Argentina), 2008-2023

Authors

  • Norma Elizabeth Levrand Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos, Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14482/INDES.33.02.965.115

Keywords:

Cultural heritage, Public budget, Entre Ríos, Cultura, Cultural rights

Abstract

Objective: Cultural heritage is a human right that is an integral part of cultural rights, which requires positive actions by the State to promote and guarantee access by its inhabitants. International instruments call for strengthening the financing of culture through a progressively increasing budget.

The Province of Entre Ríos, Argentina, reformed its Provincial Constitution in 2008, incorporated the recognition of the human right to culture, and established a percentage for its financing. Since then, several provincial laws related to cultural heritage have been enacted and updated. This paper establishes the degree of linkage between the framework of the legal regulation of cultural heritage protection and budget allocations to this area in Entre Ríos in the period 2008-2023.

Material and methods: The methodological design of this research is qualitative, combining content analysis and a descriptive-analytical analysis of budget allocations. For the analysis, the legal texts enacted during the period and the public budgets approved by the Legislative Branch were used. The timing of the study is based on the fact that the 2008 constitutional reform incorporates culture as a fundamental right and establishes that a minimum percentage (1%) of the public budget must be allocated to its financing.

Results: The characteristics of Argentine federalism as a socio-political phenomenon require a historically and geographically determined conceptualization. Concerning cultural heritage, a typical concurrence can be identified, since references to heritage can be found in jurisdictions at different levels (national, provincial, municipal).

Since the constitutional reform of 2008, the number of objects belonging to the cultural heritage of Entre Ríos has increased, as well as the number of actions related to this heritage. In addition to the provisions of the Provincial Constitution, the following laws have been enacted Law No. 10.911, which establishes a regulatory framework for tangible and intangible heritage; Law No. 10.740 for the rescue, protection, and promotion of the traditional culture of Entre Ríos, whose purpose is to preserve, protect, rescue, disseminate and promote all the traditional cultural expressions that constitute the heritage of identity; and Law No. 10.659 on Handicrafts, which incorporates the aspect of cultural heritage in its articles. All of them have the Secretariat of Culture as the implementing authority and provide for actions and functions to be carried out to implement these regulations. According to the legal texts, none of them provide specific allocations for the fulfillment of these purposes.

A detailed study of each budget can be carried out from two perspectives. On the one hand, these data can be organized from an institutional perspective, which is based on items ordered by purpose, function, and object of the public administration. These items are maintained over time and are those that make it possible to carry out the usual activities of the State. In the Province of Entre Ríos, these items are: personnel; consumer goods; non-personal services; goods for use, and transfers.

Another perspective is the functional aspect, which takes into account the allocation according to programs that, in many cases, exceed the administrative periods of each government and are maintained over time. These programs represent the activities or public policies carried out in a given period with a specific objective and may contribute to one or more institutions. In the budgets that have been analyzed, these programs allow us to distinguish at least two types of programs in the field of culture: on the one hand, those related to policies for access to and enjoyment of culture and creative productions, and on the other hand, those directly related to cultural heritage. These include custody and preservation of books and literary documents; protection of cultural heritage dependent on the provincial museums; archiving and preservation of official documents; promotion and development of artistic, and cultural activities and archiving of documents.

The results of the analyses of the public budget show an increase in legal regulations for the protection of cultural heritage in Entre Ríos in the period analyzed, although, in most of them, the actions are attended with the general budget allocations of the culture area of the provincial organization chart. In turn, an analysis of the budgets shows that the largest percentage of budget allocations is allocated to human resources. In functional terms, the programs that deal with cultural heritage institutions (museums and archives) have the highest percentage of the budget.

Conclusions: The analytical description of budget allocations allows us to understand the maintenance of cultural heritage protection functions through programs consolidated over time. This is consistent with the legislative changes that, despite the increase in regulations, concentrate protection actions.

Author Biography

  • Norma Elizabeth Levrand, Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos, Argentina

    Abogada. Doctora en Derecho. Investigadora, Instituto de Estudios Sociales (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos), Argentina. norma.levrand@uner.edu.ar. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1396-3688

References

Badeni, G. (2006). Tratado de Derecho Constitucional. La Ley.

Bardi, P., Iacopetti, S., Morin, A., Orlando, E., Osés, M., Rodríguez, M., Sáez Zamora, P. y Tanco, M. (2016). Tesauro SAIJ de Derecho Argentino. SAIJ. https://www.saij.gob.ar/docs-f/ediciones/libros/Tesauro_SAIJ_Derecho_Argentino.pdf

Bustamante Montoro, R. (2021). Glosario de términos utilizados en las intervenciones en el patrimonio cultural inmueble. Revista electrónica ReCoPar, 14, 21-39. https://polired.upm.es/index.php/recopar/article/view/4757

Castorina de Tarquini, M. (2007). El Federalismo. En M. Ábalos (Ed.), Derecho Público Provincial y Municipal (pp. 112-130). La Ley.

Calvo Manuel, A. (2016). La normalización terminológica aplicada a la conservación y restauración del patrimonio cultural. En M. Recio Crespo (Ed.), El lenguaje sobre el patrimonio. Estándares documentales para la descripción y gestión de colecciones (pp. 131-139). Subdirección General de Documentación y Publicaciones.

Cebrian, M. (2024, 12 y 13 de septiembre). El presupuesto cultural como derecho herramental: una perspectiva integral desde los derechos culturales. [Resumen de presentación de la conferencia]. IV Jornadas Nacionales de Derechos Culturales, Santa Rosa, Argentina.

Cecconi, S. (2014). Dilemas y tensiones en el proceso de patrimonialización del tango. En M. Margulis., M. Urresti y H. Lewin (Coord.), Intervenir en la cultura. Más allá de las políticas culturales (pp.175-197). Biblos.

Ciancio, M. (2018). El presupuesto público, un medio para garantizar derechos humanos. Revista Anales de la Facultad de Ciencias Jurídicas y Sociales, 15 (48), 349-364. https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/RevistaAnalesJursoc/article/view/5109

Colombato, L. (2012). Derechos culturales. Debilidades discursivas en la formulación de sus contenidos. Cuestiones transversales. Perspectivas de las Ciencias Económicas y Jurídicas, 2 (1), 81-100. https://repo.unlpam.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/unlpam/4071/v02n1a06colombato.pdf

Díaz Cabrera, M. (2010). Criterios y conceptos sobre el patrimonio cultural en el siglo XXI. Serie de Materiales de Enseñanza, 1 (1). https://cicopperu.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/criterios-conceptos-patrimonio-en-siglo-xxi.pdf

Duverger, M. (1981). Métodos de las Ciencias Sociales. Ariel.

Endere, M. y Podgorny, I. (1997). Los gliptodontes son argentinos: la ley 9080 y la creación del patrimonio nacional. Ciencia Hoy, 7 (42), 54-59.

Endere, M. L., Mariano, M., Conforti, M. E. y Mariano, C. (2015). La protección legal del patrimonio en las provincias de Buenos Aires, La Pampa y Río Negro: Viejos problemas y nuevas perspectivas. Intersecciones en antropología, 16 (1), 207-219. https://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1850-373X2015000100013&lng=es&nrm=iso

Gnemmi, H. (1983). Lo trascendente de la refuncionalización. Summarios, 67, 27-32.

Haidar, V., Grondona, A., Glozman, M. y Aguilar, P. (2014). ¿Qué es un corpus? Entramados y Perspectivas, 4 (4), 35-64. https://doi.org/10.62174/eyp.527

Hernández, A. (2000). Federalismo y Constitucionalismo Provincial. Abeledo Perrot.

Hirschmann, P. (2023). Una visión constitucional del presupuesto. Revista Jurídica de la Universidad de Palermo, 21 (1), 69-101. https://www.palermo.edu/derecho/revista_juridica/pub-21-1/Revista_Juridica_Ano21-N1_03.pdf

Lacarrieu M. y Cerdeira M. (2016). Institucionalidad y políticas culturales en Argentina. Límites y tensiones de los paradigmas de democratización y democracia cultural. Políticas Culturais em Revista, 9 (1), 10-33. https://doi.org/10.9771/pcr.v9i1.17043

Levrand, N., Alcaino, G., Staffolani, C., Metivié, M. y Tessio Conca, S. (2020). Las políticas públicas del PCI: burocracias, planificaciones y expertas/os. [Resumen de presentación de la conferencia]. 40o. Encuentro virtual “Memorias, Saberes e Identidades. La patrimonialización del patrimonio cultural inmaterial: Riesgos y peligros”.

Levrand, N. y Endere, M. (2020). Nuevas categorías patrimoniales. La incidencia del soft law en la reciente reforma a la ley de patrimonio histórico y artístico de Argentina. Direito GV, 16 (2), 1-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172201960

ONU. (1966). Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales. https://www.ohchr.org/es/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/international-covenant-economic-social-and-cultural-rights

Reyna, J. (2012). El procedimiento administrativo multidimensional como técnica regulatoria en materia ambiental, de patrimonio cultural y de pueblos originarios. A&C. Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional,12 (50), 131-169. https://doi.org/10.21056/aec.v12i50.161

Shaheed, F. (2010). Report of the independent expert in the field of cultural rights, Ms. Farida Shaheed, submitted pursuant to resolution 10/23 of the Human Rights Council. https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g10/124/40/pdf/g1012440.pdf

Tenorio Vásquez, G. A. (2023). Acciones de política pública orientadas a la sostenibilidad y divulgación del patrimonio cultural del municipio de Tuluá 2012-2016. [Tesis de grado, Universidad Central del Valle del Cauca]. https://repositorio.uceva.edu.co/bitstream/handle/20.500.12993/3836/Sostenibilidad_Patrimonio_Cultural.pdf?sequence=1

Unesco (2024). UNESCO World Conference on Cultural Policies and Sustainable Development MONDIACULT 2022. https://doi.org/10.58337/AIVC1941

Published

2025-06-09

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

The public budget and the protection of cultural heritage in Entre Ríos (Argentina), 2008-2023. (2025). Investigación & Desarrollo, 33(2), 285-313. https://doi.org/10.14482/INDES.33.02.965.115

Similar Articles

1-10 of 395

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.