Construyendo un segundo idioma. El constructivismo y la enseñanza del L2
Main Article Content
Abstract
During the last 30 years of the 20th century, the way a second language is taught and learned has changed due to new ideas of what constitutes language and advances in research on the human mind and the processing of knowledge. Today, communicative language teaching in the second language classroom is as accepted as the constructivist model of teaching in general education. However, rarely these two approaches to teaching and learning are combined, although they are harmonious. This theoretical essay views five principals that are fundamental to learning a second language from the combination of constructivism and the communicative approach.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Zona Próxima
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
References
ACKERMANN, E.K. (2004). Constructing knowledge and transforming the world, in M. TOKORO & L. STEELS (ed.), A learning zone of one's own. (17-30). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
BENÍTEZ MENÉNDEZ, O. (2007). Las tareas comunicativas en el aprendizaje de lenguas extranjeras: una alternativa para el desarrollo de habilidades comunicativas. Revista Ibero-Americano de Educación, 42. Consultado el 26 de noviembre del 2007 en: http://www.rieoei.org/experiencias150.htm.
BUSTOS, F. (1994) Peligros del constructivismo. Educación y cultura, (34), 22-29.
COELHO, E. (2004). Adding English: A guide to teaching in multilingual classrooms. Toronto: Pippin Publishing Corporation. Consultado el 23 de abril del 2009 en: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/unorte/Doc?id=10069067&ppg = 149.
ELLIS, N.C. (2006). Meta-analysis, human cognition, and language learning, en NORRIS, J.M. &
ELLIS, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
FASCÍCULO AUTOINSTRUCTIVO No. 2 (sine die). Consultado el 27 de noviembre del 2008 en: http://www.ciberdocencia.gob.pe/archivos/Estrategias_de_aprendizaje_A.pdf
FLÓREZ, R. (1994). Hacia una pedagogía del conocimiento. Bogotá: McGraw-Hill.
FLÓREZ, R. (2005) Pedagogía del conocimiento. Bogotá: McGraw-Hill.
GARCÍA MADRUGA, J. A. (1993). Aprendizaje por descubrimiento frente a aprendizaje por recepción: La teoría del aprendizaje verbal significativo, en COLL, C., PALACIOS, J., & MARCHESI, A. (ed.). Desarrollo psicológico y educación, II. Psicología de la educación (pp.81-92). Madrid: Alianza.
GÓMEZ-GRANELL, C. (1994). De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de constructivismo. Cuadernos de Pedagogía, (221), 8-10.
KRASHEN, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman. LYON, G. (1999). Language and perceptual experience. Philosophy, 74(290), 515-534.
MARTÍNEZ MARTÍNEZ, I. (2005). Nuevas perspectivas en la enseñanza aprendizaje de ELE para japoneses: La concienciación formal. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Consultado el 27 de noviembre del 2007 en: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/unortesp/Doc?id = 10090314&ppg=252.
NUNAN, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
NUNAN, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
ORTEGA, L. (ed.) Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, (301-322). Consultado el 10 de abril del 2009 en: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/unorte/Doc?id=10126071&ppg=315.
PENNYCOOK, A. (1997). Cultural alternatives and autonomy, in BENSON, P & VOLLER, P (ed.) Autonomy and independence in language learning (35-53). Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
ROSAS, R. & SEBASTIÁN, C. (2001). Piaget, Vigotski y Maturana. Constructivismo a tres voces. Buenos Aires: Aique Group.
SAVIGNON, S. J. (1991). Communicative language teaching: State of the art. TESOL Quarterly, 25(2), 261-277.
TORGA, M.C. (sine die). Vigotsky y Krashen: Zona de desarrollo próximo y el aprendizaje de una lengua extranjera. Consultado el 23 de abril del 2009 en: http://www.fchst.unlpam.edu.ar/iciels/164.pdf.
TRUMBULL, E. & FARR, B. (2005). Language and learning: What teachers need to know. Norwood: Christopher-Gordon.
TUDGE, J. (1990). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: Implications for classroom practice, in L.C. Moll (ed.) Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (155-172). New York: Cambridge University Press.
VYGOTSKY L. (1988). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. México: Crítica.
VYGOTSKY, L. (1995). Pensamiento y lenguaje. Buenos Aires: Fausto.