Mathematical talent program in basic education
Main Article Content
Abstract
A study on the identification and development of mathematical talent in elementary and se-condary school students is presented and based on the Renzulli’s School Enrichment Model. The methodology used was mixed type with concurrent embedded design of dominant model. The two stages of the study consisted of: (a) detecting students with mathematical talent in basic and secondary primary education in terms of generalization processes; and (b) designing and imple-menting an extracurricular enrichment program with students of basic and secondary primary education In terms of generalization processes in eXpresser and Google Maps environment, as well as in the Excel spreadsheet. The extracurricular enrichment program proved effective as the students managed to move towards multiplicative thinking.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Zona Próxima
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
References
Alonso, C., Gallego, D. & Honey, P. (2007). Los estilos de aprendizaje. Procedimientos de diagnóstico y mejora (7ª ed.). Bilbao: Ediciones Mensajero. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/pu- blication/311452891
Bazán, A., Sánchez, B. & Castañeda, S. (2007). Relación estructural entre apoyo familiar, nivel educa- tivo de los padres, características del maestro y desempeño en lengua escrita. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 33(12), 701-729.
Bednarz, N., Kieran, C. & Lee, L. (1996). Approaches to algebra. Perspectives for Seeing. Harmondsworth, Middlesex: BBC y Penguin Books.
Benavides, M., Ríos, C. & Marshall, M. (2004). La educación de niños con talento en Chile. En M. Benavides, A. Maz, E. Castro, y R. Blanco (eds.), La educación de los niños con talento en Iberoamé- rica (pp. 105-114). Santiago, Chile: Editorial Trineo S.A.
Butto, C. & Delgado, J. (2012). Rutas hacia el álgebra. Actividades en Excel y Logo. México: UPN-Conacyt.
Butto, C., Delgado, J. & Bazán, A. (2018). Procesos de generalización: una vía de acceso al pensamiento algebraico temprano en educación básica. Horizontes Pedagógicos, 20(1), 25-36.boleda.edu.co/bitstream/handle/11232/300/CienciasSociales%20y%20Humanas244. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Núñez, R., Gómez-Bermeo, L. V. & Cortés, C. M. (2011). El ambiente académico universitario clave del talento matemático. En Memorias XIII CIAEM. Recife, PE, Brasil. Recuperado de: https:// ciaem-redumate.org/ocs/index.php/xiii_ciaem/xiii_ciaem/paper/viewFile/2499/605
Regianni, M. (1994). Generalization as a basic for algebraic thinking: observations with 11-12 years old pupils. En Conference Proceeding of the XVIII PME (pp. 97-104). Lisboa, Portugal.
Renzulli, J. (2008). La educación del sobredotado y el desarrollo del talento para todos. Revista de Psi- cología, 26(1), 23-44.
Renzulli, J. S. & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Secretaría de Educación Pública (2011). Estrategia de atención para alumnos y alumnas con capacidades y aptitudes sobresalientes en la educación básica del D. F. México, D. F.: Secretaría de Educación Pública.
Ushakov, D. V. (2010). Olympics of the mind as a method to identify giftedness: Soviet and Russian experience. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 337-344