Content Validity of a Measurement Instrument for the Social, Emotional and Intercultural Skills of Undergraduate Students
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

Keywords

Emotional skills
Intercultural skills
Social skills
SEI
Instrument validation
content validity
CVR
CVI Competencias emocionales
Competencias interculturales
Competencias sociales
SEI
Validación instrumentos
Validez de contenido
CVR
CVI.

Abstract

One of the missions of Higher Education Institutions is the integral human formation of their students. The objective of this descriptive and non-experimental research work is to evaluate the validation and reliability of the content of an information collection instrument intended for undergraduate students of an HEI, in order to measure their social, emotional, and intercultural competencies (SEI), as developed from the contribution of the curricular internationalization strategies offered by the institution. 13 experts on the subject participated in the evaluation of the instrument. The result was a content validity ratio (CVR) in the range of 0.23 to 1, with a content validity index (CVI) of 0.92, which, by exceeding the minimum cut-off point of 0.54, shows that the evaluated measuring instrument is acceptable; furthermore, an average Cron- bach’s Alpha index of 0.81 shows that the evaluated instrument fits the research objectives.

https://doi.org/10.14482/zp.38.323.214
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

References

Álvarez-Gayou, J. L. (2014). Cómo hacer investigación cualitativa. Fundamentos y metodología. México: Paidós Educador.

Boyatzis, R., Stubbs, E. y Taylor Scott, N. (2002). Learning Cognitive and Emotional Intelligence. Competencies Through Graduate Management Education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1 (2), 150-162.

Coelho, V., Romao, A., Ribeiro, P. y Saldanha, S. (2021). A nationwide analysis of the effectiveness of a Social and Emotional Learning program in Portugal: Focus on the role of develop- ers’ involvement. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 26 (2), 2530-3805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2021.04.001.

CASEL Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (2018). Competencias del aprendizaje social y emocional (SEL). https://casel.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/CASEL-whe- el-competencies-Spanish.pdf

Corcoran, R., O’Flaherty, J., Xie, C. y Cheung, A. (2020). Conceptualizing and measuring social and emotional learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of moral reasoning and academic achievement, religiosity, political orientation, personality, Educational Research Review, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100285

Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315306287002.

Eyzaguirre, S., Le Foulon, C. y Salvatierra, V. (2020). Educación en tiempos de pandemia: Antecedentes y recomendaciones para la discusión en Chile. Estudios Públicos, 159, 111-180. https://doi. org/10.38178/07183089/1430200722

Gacel-Ávila, J. (2017). Ciudadanía Global: Concepto emergente y polémico. ESS: Educación Superior y Sociedad, 21(Colección 25o aniversario), 39-63. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/ess/index.php/ ess3/issue/view/4

García, B. (2009). Manual de métodos de investigación para las ciencias sociales. Un enfoque de enseñanza basado en proyectos. México: Manual Moderno

García, M. J. (2017). Las competencias emocionales de los trabajadores cubanos. ¿cómo medirlas? Alternativas cubanas en psicología, 5(13). http://www.alfepsi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/ alternativas-cubanas-en-psicologia-v5n13.pdf

Goleman, D. (1996). Inteligencia emocional. Barcelona: Kairós.

Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. y McKee, A. (2002). El líder resonante crea más: el poder de la Inteligencia Emocional. Plaza y Editores.

Hernández, R. y Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. México DF: McGraw-Hill.

Hernández, R. y Mendoza, C. (2018). Metodología de la investigación: Las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. México DF: McGraw-Hill.

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575.

Medina, R. (2020). Validez de Contenido de un Instrumento de Medición de Derechos Humanos en México. Revista de Ciencias Sociales (Cr), II(168), 2. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo. oa?id=15364525014

Mikulic, I., Crespi, M. y Radusky, P. (2015). Construcción y validación del inventario de Competencias Sociemocionales para adultos (ICSE). Interdisciplinaria, 32(2), 307-330. http://www. redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=18043528007

Muller, F., Denk, A., Lubaway, E., Salzer, C., Kozina, A., Vrsnik, T., Rasmusson, M., Jugovic, I., Lung Nielsen, B., Rozman, M., Ojstersek, A. y Jurko, S. (2020). Assessing social, emotional, and intercultural competences of students and school staff: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100304

Sousa, C., Gonçalves, G., Orgambídez, A. y Santos Joana. (2015). Questionário de Personalidade Multicultural: Características métricas da adaptação para a população portuguesa e correlações com a inteligência cultural. Revista portuguesa de psicologia, 43, 31-47.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.