An online doctoral writing group Factors that influence its functioning according to its participants
Main Article Content
Abstract
One of the reasons why doctoral studies are not completed is the difficulty in writing the dissertation. This problem is further accentuated when students have limited exchange opportunities with peers and professors from their postgraduate programs towards the end of their studies. A pedagogical practice that has proven to be significant to advance this type of writing is the joint revision of texts in virtual writing groups. This article analyzes the factors that influenced the development of a virtual writing group composed of three doctoral students from different Argentinian universities that have been meeting for over a year. For this purpose, a thematic analysis of data from group and individual interviews, exchanges via email, and documents related to the group’s organizational issues was carried out. In line with previous work, our results show that, according to the participants, a writing group’s usefulness depends on three interconnected types of factors: logistical, cognitive, and interpersonal. This paper contributes with empirical data that can inform future institutional initiatives created to support the development of thesis writing at the postgraduate level.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Zona Próxima
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
References
Aitchison, C. (2009). Writing groups for doctoral education. Studies in Higher Education, 34(8), 905-916. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902785580
Aitchison, C. (2010). Learning together to publish: Writing group pedagogies for doctoral publishing. En C. Aitchison, B. Kalmer y A. Lee. (Eds.), Publishing Pedagogies for the Doctorate and Beyond (pp. 83-100). Routledge.
Aitchison, C., y Guerin, C. (Eds.). (2014). Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory. Routledge.
Álvarez, G., y Difabio de Anglat, H. (2019). Retroalimentación entre pares en un taller virtual de escritura de tesis de posgrado. Apertura, 11(2), 40-53. https://doi.org/10.32870/ap.v11n2.1540
Álvarez, G., y de Anglat, H. E. D. (2021). Seminario virtual de tesis como microcomunidad de práctica académica. Panorama, 15(28), 36-53. https://doi.org/10.15765/pnrm.v15i28.1815
Bertolini, A. M. (2020). Las soledades de los doctorandos. Una aproximación pedagógica. Revista de Educación, 19, 165-185. http://fh.mdp.edu.ar/revistas/index.php/r_educ/article/view/4037
Bourgault, A. M., Galura, S. J., Kinchen, E. V., y Peach, B. C. (2022). Faculty writing accountability groups: A protocol for traditional and virtual settings. Journal of Professional Nursing, 38, 97-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.12.007
Braun, V., y Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. En H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association.
Brooke, C. T., Martin, J. M., y Short, R. A. (2021). Peer writing groups as productivity, research, and support networks for extension agents. Journal of the NACAA, 14(1). https://www.nacaa.com/journal/index.php?jid=1193
Carr, M., Clarkin-Phillips, J., Earl Rinehart, K., Edwards, F., y Ferrier-Kerr, J. (2020). Writing group commitment and caring: Teacher educators talk about identities and agency in the Third Space of a writing group. Teacher Development, 24(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.13662020.11812708
Chakma, U., Li, B., y Kabuhung, G. (2021). Creating online metacognitive spaces: Graduate research writing during the covid-19 pandemic. Issues in Educational Research, 31(1), 37-55. http://www.iier.org.au/iier31/chakma.pdf
Chakraborty, D., Soyoof, A., Moharami, M., Utami, A. D., Zeng, S., Cong-Lem, N., Hradsky, D., Maestre, J.-L., Foomani, E. M., y Pretorius, L. (2021). Feedback as a space for academic social practice in doctoral writing groups. The Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/20590776.2021.1972764
Chois Lenis, P. M., Guerrero Jiménez, H. I., y Brambila Limón, R. (2020). Una mirada analítica a la enseñanza de la escritura en posgrado: Revisión de prácticas documentadas en Latinoamérica. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 25(2), 535-556. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0123-34322020000200535
Colombo, L. (2013). Una experiencia pedagógica con grupos de escritura en el posgrado. Aula Universitaria, 15, 61-68. http://bibliotecavirtual.unl.edu.ar/publicaciones/index.php/AulaUniversitaria/article/view/4368/6643
Colombo, L. (2017). Los grupos de escritura y el aprendizaje situado en el posgrado. Jornaleros, Revista Científica de Estudios Literarios y Lingüísticos, 3(3), 154-164. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/75731
Colombo, L. (2018). El rol de las relaciones sociales en la producción de tesis doctorales. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 10, 366-378. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6494481
Colombo, L., Bruno, D., y Silva, V. (2020). Grupos de escritura, vínculos y afectividad en el nivel de posgrado. Praxis educativa, 24(3), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.19137/praxiseducativa-2020-240310
Colombo, L., y Rodas, E. L. (2021). Interdisciplinarity as an opportunity in Argentinian and Ecuadorian writing groups. Higher Education Research and Development, 40(2), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1756750
Dawson, C. M., Liu Robinson, E., Hanson, K., Vanriper, J., y Ponzio, C. (2013). Creating a breathing space: An online teachers' writing group. English Journal, 102(3), 93-99. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23365380
de Valero, Y. F., y Hernández, M. M. (2000). Factores que inciden en el Síndrome Todo Menos Tesis (TMT). Opción: revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 31, 112-129.
Flick, U. (2004). Triangulation in Qualitative Research. En U. Flick, E.von Kardoff y I. Steinke (Eds.), A Companion to Qualitative Research (pp.178-183). Sage.
Haas, S. (2014). Pick-n-Mix: a typology of writers’ groups. En C. Aitchison y C. Guerin (Eds.), Writing groups for doctoral education and beyond: Innovations in practice and theory (pp. 30-47). Routledge.
Haas, S., De Soete, A., y Ulstein, G. (2020). Zooming through Covid: Fostering safe communities of critical reflection via online writers' group interaction. Double Helix, 8, 1-10. https://wac.colostate.edu/docs/double-helix/v8/haas.pdf
Handke, L., Schulte, E.-M., Schneider, K., y Kauffeld, S. (2018). The medium isn't the message: Introducing a measure of adaptive virtual communication. Cogent Arts y Humanities, 5(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1514953
Hyland, F., y Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of second language writing, 10(3), 185-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
Johnson, C., y Lock, J. (3-7 de noviembre de 2020). Virtual writing groups: Collegial support in developing academic writing capacity [Presentación en conferencia]. Proceedings of the 2019 ICDE World Conference on Online Learning, Dublin City University, Dublín, Irlanda. http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3804014
Kozar, O., Lum, J. F. (2013). Factors likely to impact the effectiveness of research writing groups for off-campus doctoral students. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 7(2), A132-A149. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1082.6281&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Kozar, O., y Lum, J. F. (2015). Online doctoral writing groups: Do facilitators or communication modes make a difference? Quality in Higher Education, 1-14.https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2015.1032003
Liu, F., Du, J., Zhou, D. Q., y Huang, B. (2021). Exploiting the potential of peer feedback: The combined use of face-to-face feedback and e-feedback in doctoral writing groups. Assessing Writing, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100482
Maher, M., Fallucca, A., y Mulhern Halasz, H. (2013). Write on! Through to the Ph. D.: Using writing groups to facilitate doctoral degree progress. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(2), 193-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2012.736381
McLaughlin, C. J., y Sillence, E. (2018). Buffering against academic loneliness: The benefits of social media-based peer support during postgraduate study. Active Learning in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418799185
O’Dwyer, S. T., McDonough, S. L., Jefferson, R., Goff, J. A., y Redman-MacLaren, M. (2017). Writing groups in the digital age: A case study analysis of Shut Up and Write Tuesdays. En A. Esposito (Ed.), Research 2.0 and the impact of digital technologies on scholarly inquiry (pp. 249-269). IGI Global. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0830-4.ch013
Rodas, E., y Colombo, L. (2018). Writing groups in Ecuador as support for academics on the road to publication. Revista Pucará, 29, 147-167. https://publicaciones.ucuenca.edu.ec/ojs/index.php/pucara/issue/view/199/PDF129
Rodas, E. L., y Colombo, L. (2019). Ventajas y desafíos en grupos de escritura interdisciplinarios. REDU: Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 17(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2019.10528
Rodas, E. L., Colombo, L., Calle, M.D., y Cordero, G. (2021a). Escribir para publicar: Una experiencia con grupos de escritura de investigadores universitarios. Maskana, 12(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.18537/mskn.12.01.01
Rodas, E. L., Colombo, L., Calle, M. D., y Cordero, G. (2021b). Looking at faculty writing groups from within: Some insights for their sustainability and future implementations. International Journal for Academic Development, https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2021.1976189
Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H., van Dijk, A., y Dolmans, D. (2021). Improving the understanding of written peer feedback through face-to-face peer dialogue: Students’ perspective. Higher Education Research and Development, 40(5), 1100-1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889
Todey, E., y Huffman, S. R. (2020). Prioritizing graduate student needs in shifting peer review groups online during COVID-19. A blog of WLN: A Journal of Writing Center Scholarship. https://www.wlnjournal.org/blog/2020/08/prioritizing-graduate-student-needs-in-shifting-peer-review-groups-online-during-covid-19/
Van de Pol, J. E. (2012). Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: exploring, measuring, promoting and evaluating scaffolding. University of Amsterdam.
Wainerman, C. (Ed.). (2020). En estado de tesis: cómo elaborar el proyecto de tesis en Ciencias sociales. Manantial.