Case study with high school teachers: their competencies, challenges and experience
Main Article Content
Abstract
Educating is a complex but relevant task for social improvement. It is necessary to have an education of quality if the aim is to build a future where science, technology and moral values are the foundations of a society based on justice for everyone. However, this is not happening yet, neither with the structural reform of the system nor by using the evaluation on teachers. There are the same old vicious that have constructed the history of the Latin American education. A case study in a public night high school was conducted in order to know the Mexican idiosyncrasy, the way the lessons at public schools are developed, teachers’ reasons, motifs, justifications and ordinary stile of life, but especially to know teachers’ reaction to education reforms made by the Government. Conclusions based on the analysis of data gathered from the informants are shown at the end of the paper.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Zona Próxima
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
References
Denzin, N. & Lincoln Y. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
DOF (2008). Acuerdo Secretarial 447. Recuperado en http://www.c bachilleres.edu.mx/cb/comunidad/docentes/pdf/Reforma_curricular/Acuerdos/ACUERDOS_RIEM/ACUERDO447.pdf
DOF (2012). Decreto Presidencial. Recuperado de: http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5233070&fecha=09/02/2012
DOF (2013). Ley General del Servicio Profesional Docente . Recuperado en http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5313843&fecha=11/09/2013
Donaldson, M. (2012). Teacher’s perspectives on evaluation reform. United States: American Educator. Recuperado de: https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp—content/uploads/2012/12/TeacherPerspectives.pdf
Eguiluz, L. (2003). Las técnicas de la metodología cualitativa. Revista Enseñanza e Investigación en Psicología. Disponible en http://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA116037512&v=2.1&u=pu&it=r&p=IFME&sw=w&asid=52f8ad72d4754d05bc2ba9aec50580b4
García, J. (2014). ¿Para qué sirve la evaluación de la docencia? Un estudio exploratorio de las creencias de los estudiantes universitarios. Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, 22 (15). doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n15.2014
INEE (2015). Perfiles, parámetros e indicadores. Disponible en http://servicioprofesionaldocente.sep.gob.mx/content/ms/docs/2015/permanencia/PPI_DESEMPENO_EMS.pdf
Kuhn, T. (1971). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: Fondo de cultura Económica.
Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
López, G. & Tinajero, G. (2009). Los docentes ante la reforma del bachillerato. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 14(43), 1191—1218.
Martínez, P. (2006) El método de estudio de caso: estrategia metodológica de la investigación científica. Pensamiento & Gestión, 20, 165—193.
Mas, Ó. (2012). Las competencias del docente universitario: la percepción del alumno, de los expertos y del propio protagonista. Revista de Docencia Universitaria (REDU), 10 (2), 299—318.
Minnici, A. (2014). The mindshift in teacher evaluation. Where we stand and where we need to go. United States: American Educator. Recuperado de: http://www.aft.org/periodical/american—educator/spring—2014/mind—shift—teacher—evaluation
Nuño Mayer, A. (2016). 2016: año clave para la transformación educativa. Recuperado de: http://www.gob.mx/sep/articulos/2016—ano—clave—para—la—transformacion—educativa
Santillán, V. Bermúdez, M. & Montaño, M. (2011) La Práctica Docente y El Desarrollo de Habilidades Intelectuales en la Formación Profesional por Competencias. Horizontes Educacionales, 16 (2), 43—36.
Taylor, S. & Bogdan, R. (1986). Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. La búsqueda de significados. Buenos Aires: Paidós.
Valles, M. (1999). Técnicas cualitativas de investigación social. Reflexión metodológica y práctica profesional. Madrid: Síntesis.
Villalobos, E. & Parés, I. (2007) Competencias Directivas del Docente Universitario. Revista Panamericana de Pedagogía, 10, 61—83.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.