Use of discourse analysis to enhance students' critical thinking skills
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper presents our proposal on how to use critical discourse analysis to improve students' critical thinking skills. Initially we briefly outline some concepts of critical thinking and critical discourse analysis, and then we propose a reading activity in which students analyze two different and contrasting texts that deal with oil spill issues. The activity is divided into three sections. In the initial section we suggest a pre-reading activity, in which students answer some questions to activate background knowledge. Secondly, we present a reading activity; in this reading activity students complete a table using a system for analyzing discourse, which is known as "appraisal". In turn "appraisal" is divided into affect, judgment, and appreciation, and each one can be either positive or negative; they show how the author feels about people and things. Finally, we suggest a post-reading activity in which students draw some conclusions based on their "appraisal" analysis.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Zona Próxima
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
References
BBC NEWS. Retrieved, December 10, 2007 from: http://news.bbc.co.Uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2491965.stm.
BLOYER, G. (2003). Retrieved, December 10, (2007). from: http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/bloyer/030331.
CELCE-MURCIA, M. & OLSHTAIN, E. (2000) Discourse and context in language teaching: a guide for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
FISHER, A. (2001). Critical Thinking. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HUNSTON, S & THOMSON, G. (eds.) (2001). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the production of discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MALOOF, C. (2007). Critical Discourse Analysis: Appraisal. UnpUblished paper.
MARTIN, J.R. & ROSE, D. (2003). Working with discourse. Meaning beyond the clause. New York: Continuum.
The Critical Thinking Community. (2007). Retrieved, November 28, 2007 from: http://www.criticalthinking.org/page.cfm?CategoryID=51.
PAUL, R. & ELDER L. (2006). Critical thinking. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
THOMSON, G. (1996). Introducing functional grammar. London: Arnold.