Skill of critical thinking for establishing a position on a subject in digital writing
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article is the result of an investigation which had among its objectives to strengthen critical thinking skills when writing digital texts in learning environments supported by Web 2.0 tools in a group of eleventh grade students. This article presents the results of the ability of critical thinking for establishing a position on a subject in digital writing. The approach taken in the study was mixed, involving 32 students, who for 11 sessions developed digital productions that could demonstrate the positions on a topic. The main results showed that it is possible to strengthen the establishment of the position on a subject in digital writing practices.
Downloads
Article Details
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in Zona Próxima
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
References
Andriessen, J. (2006) Arguing to learn. In K. Sawyer (Ed.) Handbook of the Learning Sciences (443-459). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Condon, W., & Kelly-Riley, D. (2004). Assessing and teaching what we value: the relationship between college-level writing and critical thinking abilities. Assessing Writing, 9, 56-75.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3.a ed.). Londres: Sage.
Facione, P.A. (1990). Critical thinking: a statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction: executive summary: The Delphi Report. Recuperado de http://www.insightassessment.com/9dex.html.
Fisher, A. (2001) Critical thinking: an introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guiller, J., Durndell, A. & Ross, A. (2008). Peer interaction and critical thinking: face-to-face or online discussion? Learning and Instruction 18, 187-200.
Halpern, D. (2006). Halpern critical thinking assessment using everyday situations: background and scoring standards (2nd report). Unpublished manuscript. Claremont, CA: Claremont McKenna College.
Henao A.O. & Ramírez S.D. (2006) Impacto de una experiencia de producción textual mediada por tecnologías de información y comunicación en las nociones sobre el valor epistémico de la escritura. Revista Educación y Pedagogía, 18 (46), 223-238
Hernández S.R., Fernández C.C., & Baptista L,P. (2010). Metodología de la investigación (5a ed.). México: McGraw-Hill.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kuhn, D. (1999). A developmental model of critical thinking. Educational researcher, 28,16-25.
Lipman, M. (2001). Pensamiento complejo y educación. Madrid: Ediciones de la Tor